Advertisement

American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis

      Description

      The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Update is to review the available evidence and expert recommendations regarding the clinical care of patients with pancreatic necrosis and to offer concise best practice advice for the optimal management of patients with this highly morbid condition.

      Methods

      This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. This review is framed around the 15 best practice advice points agreed upon by the authors, which reflect landmark and recent published articles in this field. This expert review also reflects the experiences of the authors, who are advanced endoscopists or hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons with extensive experience in managing and teaching others to care for patients with pancreatic necrosis.

      Best Practice Advice 1

      Pancreatic necrosis is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach, including gastroenterologists, surgeons, interventional radiologists, and specialists in critical care medicine, infectious disease, and nutrition. In situations where clinical expertise may be limited, consideration should be given to transferring patients with significant pancreatic necrosis to an appropriate tertiary-care center.

      Best Practice Advice 2

      Antimicrobial therapy is best indicated for culture-proven infection in pancreatic necrosis or when infection is strongly suspected (ie, gas in the collection, bacteremia, sepsis, or clinical deterioration). Routine use of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent infection of sterile necrosis is not recommended.

      Best Practice Advice 3

      When infected necrosis is suspected, broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics with ability to penetrate pancreatic necrosis should be favored (eg, carbapenems, quinolones, and metronidazole). Routine use of antifungal agents is not recommended. Computed tomography–guided fine-needle aspiration for Gram stain and cultures is unnecessary in the majority of cases.

      Best Practice Advice 4

      In patients with pancreatic necrosis, enteral feeding should be initiated early to decrease the risk of infected necrosis. A trial of oral nutrition is recommended immediately in patients in whom there is absence of nausea and vomiting and no signs of severe ileus or gastrointestinal luminal obstruction. When oral nutrition is not feasible, enteral nutrition by either nasogastric/duodenal or nasojejunal tube should be initiated as soon as possible. Total parenteral nutrition should be considered only in cases where oral or enteral feeds are not feasible or tolerated.

      Best Practice Advice 5

      Drainage and/or debridement of pancreatic necrosis is indicated in patients with infected necrosis. Drainage and/or debridement may be required in patients with sterile pancreatic necrosis and persistent unwellness marked by abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and nutritional failure or with associated complications, including gastrointestinal luminal obstruction; biliary obstruction; recurrent acute pancreatitis; fistulas; or persistent systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

      Best Practice Advice 6

      Pancreatic debridement should be avoided in the early, acute period (first 2 weeks), as it has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Debridement should be optimally delayed for 4 weeks and performed earlier only when there is an organized collection and a strong indication.

      Best Practice Advice 7

      Percutaneous drainage and transmural endoscopic drainage are both appropriate first-line, nonsurgical approaches in managing patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). Endoscopic therapy through transmural drainage of WON may be preferred, as it avoids the risk of forming a pancreatocutaneous fistula.

      Best Practice Advice 8

      Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic necrosis should be considered in patients with infected or symptomatic necrotic collections in the early, acute period (<2 weeks), and in those with WON who are too ill to undergo endoscopic or surgical intervention. Percutaneous drainage should be strongly considered as an adjunct to endoscopic drainage for WON with deep extension into the paracolic gutters and pelvis or for salvage therapy after endoscopic or surgical debridement with residual necrosis burden.

      Best Practice Advice 9

      Self-expanding metal stents in the form of lumen-apposing metal stents appear to be superior to plastic stents for endoscopic transmural drainage of necrosis.

      Best Practice Advice 10

      The use of direct endoscopic necrosectomy should be reserved for those patients with limited necrosis who do not adequately respond to endoscopic transmural drainage using large-bore, self-expanding metal stents/lumen-apposing metal stents alone or plastic stents combined with irrigation. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy is a therapeutic option in patients with large amounts of infected necrosis, but should be performed at referral centers with the necessary endoscopic expertise and interventional radiology and surgical backup.

      Best Practice Advice 11

      Minimally invasive operative approaches to the debridement of acute necrotizing pancreatitis are preferred to open surgical necrosectomy when possible, given lower morbidity.

      Best Practice Advice 12

      Multiple minimally invasive surgical techniques are feasible and effective, including videoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal debridement, laparoscopic transgastric debridement, and open transgastric debridement. Selection of approach is best determined by pattern of disease, physiology of the patient, experience and expertise of the multidisciplinary team, and available resources.

      Best Practice Advice 13

      Open operative debridement maintains a role in the modern management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in cases not amenable to less invasive endoscopic and/or surgical procedures.

      Best Practice Advice 14

      For patients with disconnected left pancreatic remnant after acute necrotizing mid-body necrosis, definitive surgical management with distal pancreatectomy should be undertaken in patients with reasonable operative candidacy. Insufficient evidence exists to support the management of the disconnected left pancreatic remnant with long-term transenteric endoscopic stenting.

      Best Practice Advice 15

      A step-up approach consisting of percutaneous drainage or endoscopic transmural drainage using either plastic stents and irrigation or self-expanding metal stents/lumen-apposing metal stents alone, followed by direct endoscopic necrosectomy, and then surgical debridement is reasonable, although approaches may vary based on the available clinical expertise.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations used in this paper:

      DEN (direct endoscopic necrosectomy), DPDS (disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome), EUS (endoscopic ultrasound), LAMS (lumen-apposing metal stent), SEMS (self-expandable metal stent), TEN (total enteral nutrition), TPN (total parenteral nutrition), VARD (video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement), WON (walled-off pancreatic necrosis)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      AGA Member Login
      Login with your AGA username and password.
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Trikudanathan G.
        • Wolbrink D.R.J.
        • van Santvoort H.C.
        • et al.
        Current concepts in severe acute and necrotizing pancreatitis: an evidence-based approach.
        Gastroenterology. 2019; 156: 1994-2007 e3
        • Banks P.A.
        • Bollen T.L.
        • Dervenis C.
        • et al.
        Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus.
        Gut. 2013; 62: 102-111
        • Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines
        IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis.
        Pancreatology. 2013; 13: e1-e15
        • Vege S.S.
        • DiMagno M.J.
        • Forsmark C.E.
        • et al.
        Initial Medical treatment of acute pancreatitis: American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review.
        Gastroenterology. 2018; 154: 1103-1139
        • Crockett S.D.
        • Wani S.
        • Gardner T.B.
        • et al.
        American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on Initial Management of Acute Pancreatitis.
        Gastroenterology. 2018; 154: 1096-1101
        • Isenmann R.
        • Runzi M.
        • Kron M.
        • et al.
        Prophylactic antibiotic treatment in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.
        Gastroenterology. 2004; 126: 997-1004
        • Dellinger E.P.
        • Tellado J.M.
        • Soto N.E.
        • et al.
        Early antibiotic treatment for severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 245: 674-683
        • Garcia-Barrasa A.
        • Borobia F.G.
        • Pallares R.
        • et al.
        A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13: 768-774
        • Petrov M.S.
        • Kukosh M.V.
        • Emelyanov N.V.
        A randomized controlled trial of enteral versus parenteral feeding in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis shows a significant reduction in mortality and in infected pancreatic complications with total enteral nutrition.
        Dig Surg. 2006; 23 (discussion 344–345): 336-344
        • Wu X.M.
        • Ji K.Q.
        • Wang H.Y.
        • et al.
        Total enteral nutrition in prevention of pancreatic necrotic infection in severe acute pancreatitis.
        Pancreas. 2010; 39: 248-251
        • Singh N.
        • Sharma B.
        • Sharma M.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of early enteral feeding through nasogastric and nasojejunal tube in severe acute pancreatitis: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
        Pancreas. 2012; 41: 153-159
        • Eatock F.C.
        • Chong P.
        • Menezes N.
        • et al.
        A randomized study of early nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100: 432-439
        • van Santvoort H.C.
        • Bakker O.J.
        • Bollen T.L.
        • et al.
        A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome.
        Gastroenterology. 2011; 141: 1254-1263
        • van Santvoort H.C.
        • Besselink M.G.
        • Bakker O.J.
        • et al.
        A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1491-1502
        • van Brunschot S.
        • van Grinsven J.
        • van Santvoort H.C.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2018; 391: 51-58
        • Nemoto Y.
        • Attam R.
        • Arain M.A.
        • et al.
        Interventions for walled off necrosis using an algorithm based endoscopic step-up approach: outcomes in a large cohort of patients.
        Pancreatology. 2017; 17: 663-668
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Holt B.A.
        • Hawes R.H.
        • et al.
        Outcomes after implementing a tailored endoscopic step-up approach to walled-off necrosis in acute pancreatitis.
        Br J Surg. 2014; 101: 1729-1738
        • Ross A.S.
        • Irani S.
        • Gan S.I.
        • et al.
        Dual-modality drainage of infected and symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis: long-term clinical outcomes.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 79: 929-935
        • Baron T.H.
        • Thaggard W.G.
        • Morgan D.E.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis.
        Gastroenterology. 1996; 111: 755-764
        • Baron T.H.
        • Kozarek R.A.
        Endotherapy for organized pancreatic necrosis: perspectives after 20 years.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10: 1202-1207
        • Abu Dayyeh B.K.
        • Mukewar S.
        • Majumder S.
        • et al.
        Large-caliber metal stents versus plastic stents for the management of pancreatic walled-off necrosis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87: 141-149
        • Sharaiha R.Z.
        • Tyberg A.
        • Khashab M.A.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic therapy with lumen-apposing metal stents is safe and effective for patients with pancreatic walled-off necrosis.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14: 1797-1803
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Hasan M.K.
        • Navaneethan U.
        • et al.
        Lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: when and for whom?.
        Dig Endosc. 2017; 29: 83-90
        • Gardner T.B.
        • Chahal P.
        • Papachristou G.I.
        • et al.
        A comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy with transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69: 1085-1094
        • Trikudanathan G.
        • Tawfik P.
        • Amateau S.K.
        • et al.
        Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥ 4 weeks) endoscopically centered step-up interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 1550-1558
        • van der Wiel S.E.
        • Poley J.W.
        • Grubben M.
        • et al.
        The EndoRotor, a novel tool for the endoscopic management of pancreatic necrosis.
        Endoscopy. 2018; 50: E240-E241
        • Freeny P.C.
        • Hauptmann E.
        • Althaus S.J.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: techniques and results.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170: 969-975
        • Horvath K.
        • Freeny P.
        • Escallon J.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected pancreatic collections: a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase 2 study.
        Arch Surg. 2010; 145: 817-825
        • Munene G.
        • Dixon E.
        • Sutherland F.
        Open transgastric debridement and internal drainage of symptomatic non-infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis.
        HPB (Oxford). 2011; 13: 234-239
        • Gibson S.C.
        • Robertson B.F.
        • Dickson E.J.
        • et al.
        'Step-port' laparoscopic cystgastrostomy for the management of organized solid predominant post-acute fluid collections after severe acute pancreatitis.
        HPB (Oxford). 2014; 16: 170-176
        • Worhunsky D.J.
        • Qadan M.
        • Dua M.M.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic transgastric necrosectomy for the management of pancreatic necrosis.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 219: 735-743
        • Howard T.J.
        • Patel J.B.
        • Zyromski N.
        • et al.
        Declining morbidity and mortality rates in the surgical management of pancreatic necrosis.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2007; 11: 43-49
        • Parikh P.Y.
        • Pitt H.A.
        • Kilbane M.
        • et al.
        Pancreatic necrosectomy: North American mortality is much lower than expected.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209: 712-719
        • Rodriguez J.R.
        • Razo A.O.
        • Targarona J.
        • et al.
        Debridement and closed packing for sterile or infected necrotizing pancreatitis: insights into indications and outcomes in 167 patients.
        Ann Surg. 2008; 247: 294-299
        • Kozarek R.A.
        • Ball T.J.
        • Patterson D.J.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections.
        Gastroenterology. 1991; 100: 1362-1370
        • Nealon W.H.
        • Bhutani M.
        • Riall T.S.
        • et al.
        A unifying concept: pancreatic ductal anatomy both predicts and determines the major complications resulting from pancreatitis.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208 (discussion 799–801): 790-799
        • Howard T.J.
        • Moore S.A.
        • Saxena R.
        • et al.
        Pancreatic duct strictures are a common cause of recurrent pancreatitis after successful management of pancreatic necrosis.
        Surgery. 2004; 136: 909-916
        • Fischer T.D.
        • Gutman D.S.
        • Hughes S.J.
        • et al.
        Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: disease classification and management strategies.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 219: 704-712
        • Nadkarni N.A.
        • Kotwal V.
        • Sarr M.G.
        • et al.
        Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: endoscopic stent or surgeon's knife?.
        Pancreas. 2015; 44: 16-22
        • Varadarajulu S.
        • Wilcox C.M.
        Endoscopic placement of permanent indwelling transmural stents in disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: does benefit outweigh the risks?.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 1408-1412
        • Rana S.S.
        • Bhasin D.K.
        • Rao C.
        • et al.
        Consequences of long term indwelling transmural stents in patients with walled off pancreatic necrosis & disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome.
        Pancreatology. 2013; 13: 486-490
        • Hollemans R.A.
        • Bakker O.J.
        • Boermeester M.A.
        • et al.
        Superiority of step-up approach vs open necrosectomy in long-term follow-up of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.
        Gastroenterology. 2019; 156: 1016-1026
        • Bang J.Y.
        • Arnoletti J.P.
        • Holt B.A.
        • et al.
        An endoscopic transluminal approach, compared with minimally invasive surgery, reduces complications and costs for patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.
        Gastroenterology. 2019; 156: 1027-1040 e3