Gastroenterology
Volume 141, Issue 1 , Pages 98-105.e1, July 2011

High Levels of Folate From Supplements and Fortification Are Not Associated With Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer

Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia

Received 17 November 2010; accepted 8 April 2011. published online 15 April 2011.

Background & Aims

Folate intake has been inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk in several prospective epidemiologic studies. However, no study fully assessed the influence of the high levels of folate that are frequently consumed in the United States as a result of mandatory folate fortification, which was fully implemented in 1998, and the recent increase in use of folate-containing supplements. There is evidence that consumption of high levels of folic acid, the form of folate used for fortification and in supplements, has different effects on biochemical pathways than natural folates and might promote carcinogenesis.

Methods

We investigated the association between folate intake and colorectal cancer among 43,512 men and 56,011 women in the Cancer Prevention Study II (CPS-II) Nutrition Cohort; 1023 were diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 1999 and 2007, a period entirely after folate fortification began. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate multivariate hazards ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Intake of high levels of natural folate (RRQ5vsQ1 = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.70–1.06; P trend = .12) or folic acid (RRQ5vsQ1 = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.68–1.03; P trend = .06) were not significantly associated with risk of colorectal cancer. Total folate intake was significantly associated with lower risk (RRQ5vsQ1 = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.66–0.99; P trend = .047).

Conclusions

Intake of high levels of total folate reduces risk of colorectal cancer; there is no evidence that dietary fortification or supplementation with this vitamin increases colorectal cancer risk.

Keywords: Carcinogenesis, B Vitamins, Cancer Prevention, CRC, Epidemiology

Abbreviations used in this paper: CI, confidence interval, CPS-II, Cancer Prevention Study II, FFQ, food frequency questionnaire, RR, relative risk

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

 Funding This research was supported by the American Cancer Society.

PII: S0016-5085(11)00475-6

doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.004

Gastroenterology
Volume 141, Issue 1 , Pages 98-105.e1, July 2011