Does Capsule Endoscopy Improve Outcomes in Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding? Randomized Trial Versus Dedicated Small Bowel Radiography
Background & Aims
Capsule endoscopy improves the diagnostic yield in patients with obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, but whether it improves outcomes is uncertain.
Methods
Patients with obscure GI bleeding and negative upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and push enteroscopy were randomly assigned to capsule endoscopy or dedicated small bowel contrast radiography. Patients returned at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for follow-up visits and to check hemoglobin level. The primary endpoint was further bleeding.
Results
The predefined sample size of 136 patients (54 overt bleeding, 82 occult bleeding) was enrolled. Diagnostic yield was 20 (30%) with capsule vs 5 (7%) with radiography (difference = 23%; 95% CI: 11%–36%). Further bleeding with capsule versus radiography occurred in 20 (30%) versus 17 (24%) (difference, 6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], −9% to 21%), subsequent diagnostic or therapeutic interventions for bleeding were performed in 17 (26%) versus 15 (21%) (difference, 4%; 95% CI, −10% to 19%), subsequent hospitalizations for bleeding were required in 8 (12%) versus 4 (6%) (difference, 6%; 95% CI, −3% to 16%), and subsequent blood transfusions were given in 5 (8%) versus 4 (6%) (difference, 2%; 95% CI, −7% to 10%). Further bleeding was more common in patients presenting with overt bleeding than in those with occult bleeding (21/54 [39%] vs 16/82 [20%]; difference, 19%; 95% CI, 4% to 35%).
Conclusions
The significant improvement in diagnostic yield with capsule endoscopy may not translate into improved outcomes in a population with obscure GI bleeding. Most patients do well whether or not abnormalities are identified, and additional diagnostic or therapeutic interventions may be required whether or not capsule endoscopy identifies a source of bleeding.
Keywords: Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Capsule Endoscopy, Small Bowel Radiography
Abbreviations used in this paper: CI, confidence interval, GI, gastrointestinal
This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity on page e11. Learning Objective: Upon completion of reading this article, successful learners will be able to discuss the diagnostic evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.
Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding This work was supported by a grant from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Wireless Video Capsule Endoscopy Clinical Research Award (Project no. 16; 2004).
PII: S0016-5085(10)00156-3
doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.047
© 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Continuing Medical Education Exam 1, May 2010 , 22 March 2010

