« Previous
Next »
Gastroenterology
Volume 138, Issue 4
, Pages 1286-1296.e3
, April 2010
Once-Daily Dosing of Delayed-Release Oral Mesalamine (400-mg Tablet) Is as Effective as Twice-Daily Dosing for Maintenance of Remission of Ulcerative Colitis
References
- . Systematic review: the pharmacokinetic profiles of oral mesalazine formulations and mesalazine pro-drugs used in the management of ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:29–42
- . Oral 5-ASA therapy in ulcerative colitis: what are the implications of the new formulations?. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:338–344
- . Salazopyrin, a new sulfanilamide preparation. Acta Med Scand. 1942;110:577–598
- Adverse reactions during salicylazosulfapyridine therapy and the relation with drug metabolism and acetylator phenotype. N Engl J Med. 1973;289:491–495
- . Azodisal sodium in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (A study of tolerance and relapse-prevention properties). Gastroenterology. 1986;90:1024–1030
- . Controlled trial comparing olsalazine and sulphasalazine for the maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis. Gut. 1988;29:835–837
- . Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis (A randomized study). N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1625–1629
- Oral mesalamine (Asacol) for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis (A multicenter study). Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:350–355
- . An oral preparation of mesalamine as long-term maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis (A randomized, placebo-controlled trial). Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:204–211
- Mesalamine capsules for treatment of active ulcerative colitis: results of a controlled trial (Pentasa Study Group). Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:1188–1197
- Balsalazide is more effective and better tolerated than mesalamine in the treatment of acute ulcerative colitis (The Abacus Investigator Group). Gastroenterology. 1998;114:15–22
- A randomized, double-blind, dose-response comparison of balsalazide (6.75 g), balsalazide (2.25 g), and mesalamine (2.4 g) in the treatment of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1398–1407
- Metabolism and urinary excretion of 5-amino salicylic acid in healthy volunteers when given intravenously or released for absorption at different sites in the gastrointestinal tract. Gut. 1987;28:196–200
- An oral preparation to release drugs in the human colon. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;14:405–408
- 5-aminosalicylic acid in a slow-release preparation: bioavailability, plasma level, and excretion in humans. Gastroenterology. 1982;83:1062–1070
- Once daily MMX mesalazine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a phase II, dose-ranging study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:1087–1097
- Once-daily high concentration MMX mesalamine in active ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:66–75
- Effect of once- or twice-daily MMX mesalamine (SPD476) for the induction of remission of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:95–102
- Randomized trial of once- or twice-daily MMX™ mesalazine for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2008;57:893–902
- Gastrointestinal transit and release of 5-aminosalicylic acid from 153Sm-labelled mesalazine pellets vs. tablets in male healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:1163–1169
- Once daily versus three times daily mesalazine granules in active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Gut. 2009;58:233–240
- Once daily 3 g mesalamine is the optimal dose for maintaining clinical remission in ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled, dose-ranging study. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(Suppl 1):A489
- Prescribing information for Apriso (extended release mesalamine). Morrisville, NC: Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2009;
- . Is once-daily mesalazine equivalent to the currently used twice-daily regimen? (A study performed in 30 healthy volunteers). J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;47:334–342
- Mesalamine once daily is more effective than twice daily in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:762–769
- Once versus divided daily dosing with delayed-release mesalazine: a study of tissue drug concentrations and standard pharmacokinetic parameters. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:53–62
- Comparable pharmacokinetics (PK) of two delayed release formulations of oral mesalamine. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:S465
- . A pilot feasibility study of once daily dosing versus conventional dosing mesalamine for maintenance of ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:170–173
- Once daily versus conventional dosing of pH-dependent mesalamine long-term to maintain quiescent ulcerative colitis: preliminary results from a randomized trial. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008;2:253–258
- A simple clinical colitis activity index. Gut. 1998;43:29–32
- Patient defined dichotomous end points for remission and clinical improvement in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2005;54:782–788
- . Self-regulation and self-management in asthma: exploring the role of illness perceptions and treatment beliefs in explaining non-adherence to preventer medication. Psychol Health. 2002;17:17–32
- Safety and efficacy of controlled-release mesalamine for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (Pentasa UC Maintenance Study Group). Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:296–304
- Is endoscopy necessary for the measurement of disease activity in ulcerative colitis?. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:355–361
- A systematic prospective comparison of non-invasive disease activity indices in ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1081–1088
- Medication nonadherence and the outcomes of patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Am J Med. 2003;114:39–43
- Predictors of persistence with 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:855–862
This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity on page e11. Learning Objective: Upon completion of reading this article, successful learners will become familiar with the comparative efficacy of once-daily dosing of delayed-release mesalamine as compared with divided dosing in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: William Sandborn has served as a consultant for and received research funding from Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and Shire Pharmaceuticals, and has served as a consultant for Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc; Joshua Korzenik has served as a consultant for Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Shire, CytokinePharma, Eurand, Zyogenetics, and received research funding from Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals; Bret Lashner has served on the Advisory Board/Speakers Bureau for Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Salix, Shire, UCB, Abbott, and Prometheus; Jonathan Leighton has served as a consultant for Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and received research funding from Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Abbott, Bristol Myers Squibb, Otsuka, and Centocor; Uma Mahadevan has served as a consultant for Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and Shire; James F. Marion has served as a consultant for Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and has served on the Speakers Bureau for Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Shire, and UCB; Michael Safdi has received research funding from Forest Research Institute, Conatus, Shire, Tibotec, Millennium, Cosmo, Abbott, Centocor, Pfizer, Elan, Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Biolex, Gilead, Roche, Vertex, Celltech, Eisai, BMS, and Lexicon, has served as a consultant for Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, and has served on the Speakers Bureau for Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Shire, and Centocor; Charles A. Sninsky has served on Advisory Boards and Speakers Bureau for Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Shire, Centocor, Abbott, UCB, and Prometheus; Keith A. Friedenberg owns shares of Procter & Gamble stock; Preston Dunnmon and David Ramsey are employees of Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals; and Sunanda Kane has served as a consultant for and received research funding from Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and Shire. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts: Raman M. Patel.
Funding This study was funded by Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Mason, Ohio. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00505778.
View this article's video abstract at www.gastrojournal.org.
PII: S0016-5085(10)00006-5
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.054
© 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Gastroenterology
Volume 138, Issue 4
, Pages 1286-1296.e3
, April 2010

