Gastroenterology
Volume 138, Issue 2 , Pages 478-486, February 2010

Efficacy of Ceftriaxone or Meropenem as Initial Therapies in Whipple's Disease

  • Gerhard E. Feurle

      Affiliations

    • DRK Krankenhaus, Neuwied, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests Address requests for reprints to: Gerhard E. Feurle, MD, DRK Krankenhaus Neuwied, Marktstraße 104, 56564 Neuwied, Germany. fax: (49) 2631-981492
  • ,
  • Natascha S. Junga

      Affiliations

    • St. Josef Krankenhaus, Braunau, Austria
  • ,
  • Thomas Marth

      Affiliations

    • Krankenhaus Maria Hilf, Daun, Germany

Received 30 June 2009; accepted 19 October 2009. published online 30 October 2009.

Background & Aims

Whipple's disease is a chronic infection caused by the actinomycete Tropheryma whipplei. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of antimicrobials that are able to cross the blood-brain barrier and to which T whipplei is susceptible.

Methods

Patients from central Europe with previously untreated Whipple's disease (n = 40) were assigned randomly to groups given daily infusions of either ceftriaxone (1 × 2 g, 20 patients) or meropenem (3 × 1 g, 20 patients) for 14 days, followed by oral trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for 12 months. The primary outcome measured was maintenance of remission for 3 years, determined by a composite index of clinical and laboratory data as well as histology.

Results

All patients were observed for the entire follow-up period (median, 89 mo; range, 71–128 mo); all achieved clinical and laboratory remission. Remission was maintained in all patients during the time of observation, except for 2 who died from unrelated causes. A single patient with asymptomatic cerebrospinal infection who was resistant to both treatments responded to chloroquine and minocycline. The odds ratio for the end point (remission for at least 3 years) was 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.05–16.29; P = 1.0).

Conclusions

This was a randomized controlled trial to show that treatment with ceftriaxone or meropenem, followed by trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, cures patients with Whipple's disease. One asymptomatic individual with infection of the cerebrospinal fluid required additional therapy.

Abbreviations used in this paper: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration, PAS, periodic acid–Schiff, PCR, polymerase chain reaction

 

 This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity on page e11. Learning Objective: Upon completion of reading this article, successful learners will be able to define the primary diagnostic procedures to diagnose Whipple's disease and will to be able to specify the circumstances in a puzzling illness in which it is not necessary to consider Whipple's disease. The learner should further be able to select the most appropriate procedure to diagnose cerebral Whipple's disease and to define to-days evidence-based strategy in the treatment of Whipple's disease.

 Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

 Funding This work was supported by the Fifth Framework Program of the European Union (QLG1-CT-2002-01049). Dr Feurle was supported by the European Commission and has received an honorarium for a written expert opinion from Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach–Wyhlen, the producer of Ceftriaxone. Roche has never been in contact with Dr Feurle concerning the randomized trial. Drs Junga and Marth have received support from the European Commission.

PII: S0016-5085(09)01938-6

doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.10.041

Refers to article:

  • IV or Not IV? Just One of the Antibiotic Questions in Whipple's Disease , 23 December 2009

    Cynthia L. Sears, Sara E. Cosgrove
    Gastroenterology February 2010 (Vol. 138, Issue 2, Pages 422-426)

  • February CME Exam 2 Questions , 21 December 2009

    Gastroenterology February 2010 (Vol. 138, Issue 2, Pages e11-e12)

Gastroenterology
Volume 138, Issue 2 , Pages 478-486, February 2010