Hepatitis B Virus Resistance to Nucleos(t)ide Analogues
Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) can be successfully treated using nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA), but drug-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutants frequently arise, leading to treatment failure and progression to liver disease. There has been much research into the mechanisms of resistance to NA and selection of these mutants. Five NA have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of CHB; it is unlikely that any more NA will be developed in the near future, so it is important to better understand mechanisms of cross-resistance (when a mutation that mediates resistance to one NA also confers resistance to another) and design more effective therapeutic strategies for these 5 agents. The genes that encode the polymerase and envelope proteins of HBV overlap, so resistance mutations in polymerase usually affect the hepatitis B surface antigen; these alterations affect infectivity, vaccine efficacy, pathogenesis of liver disease, and transmission throughout the population. Associations between HBV genotype and resistance phenotype have allowed cross-resistance profiles to be determined for many commonly detected mutants, so genotyping assays can be used to adapt therapy. Patients that experience virologic breakthrough or partial response to their primary therapy can often be successfully treated with a second NA, if this drug is given at early stages of these events. However, best strategies for preventing NA resistance include first-line use of the most potent antivirals with a high barrier to resistance. It is important to continue basic research into HBV replication and pathogenic mechanisms to identify new therapeutic targets, develop novel antiviral agents, design combination therapies that prevent drug resistance, and decrease the incidence of complications of CHB.
Abbreviations used in this paper: ADV, adefovir dipivoxil, CHB, chronic hepatitis B, ETV, entecavir, HBV, hepatitis B virus, LdT, telbivudine, LMV, lamivudine, NA, nucleos(t)ide analogs, TDF, tenofovir
Conflicts of interest The authors disclose the following: F.Z. has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Gilead Sc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Roche and has received research support from Gilead Sc and Roche. S.L. has received consulting and speaking honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Abbott Diagnostic, and Evivar Medical Pty Ltd.
Funding Supported by the European Community (ViRgil network of excellence; ViRgil LSHM-CT-2004-503359; to F.Z.) and grants from the National Agency for Research against AIDS and Hepatitis (ANRS; to F.Z.) and funding from the US National Institutes of Health (RO1 AIO60449 and RO1 AI071820; to S.L.).
PII: S0016-5085(09)01556-X
doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.063
© 2009 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


