Quantitative Perfusion Analysis of Transabdominal Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography of Pancreatic Masses and Carcinomas
Background & Aims
Preoperative differential diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and focal masses in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) can be challenging. There are fine differences in the vascularization of these lesions; ultrasound contrast agents can aid in their differentiation. We evaluated the value of software-aided quantitative analysis of transabdominal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of PDAC vs focal masses.
Methods
Sixty patients for whom it was not possible to differentiate between an inflammatory focal lesion of the pancreas and a pancreatic carcinoma underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with a second-generation contrast agent. Time-intensity curves were obtained for all exams in 2 regions of interest within the lesion and within the normal pancreatic tissue. Images were processed using Axius ACQ software; the following parameters were obtained: maximum intensity, arrival time, time-to-peak, and area under the curve. Absolute values and differences between the lesion and the normal tissue were evaluated.
Results
Histology analysis revealed 45 PDACs and 15 inflammatory masses in patients with CP. Time-dependent parameters (arrival time and time to peak) were significantly longer in PDACs compared to focal masses. Although markedly lower than in healthy pancreata, the maximum intensity and area under the curve parameters were not significantly different between PDACs and focal lesions in patients with CP.
Conclusions
In cases of CP, PDAC and focal masses exhibit different perfusion patterns at a capillary level that can be visualized using the small microbubbles of ultrasound contrast agents. Contrast quantification software supplements a subjective visual assessment with objective criteria to facilitate the differential diagnosis of focal lesions in pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis.
Abbreviations used in this paper: AUC, area under the curve, 95% CI, 95% confidence interval, CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, CP, chronic pancreatitis, CT, computed tomography, Imax, maximum intensity gain, MRI, magnetic resonance imaging, PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, ROI, region of interest, tarr, arrival time, tpeak, time to reach peak intensity
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Conflict of interest The authors disclose the following: S.K. and A.B. have previously received a research grant from Bracco Inc for a research project on contrast agents in liver sonography. No direct or indirect influence has been derived from that completed project. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding The manuscript has been revised by American Journal Experts, a scientific editing service; the costs were covered by S.K.
PII: S0016-5085(09)01508-X
doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.049
© 2009 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

