A Cost-Utility Analysis of Ablative Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus
Background & Aims
Recommendations for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) include endoscopic surveillance with esophagectomy for early-stage cancer, although new technologies to ablate dysplasia and metaplasia are available. This study compares the cost utility of ablation with that of endoscopic surveillance strategies.
Methods
A decision analysis model was created to examine a population of patients with BE (mean age 50), with separate analyses for patients with no dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia (LGD), or high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Strategies compared were no endoscopic surveillance; endoscopic surveillance with ablation for incident dysplasia; immediate ablation followed by endoscopic surveillance in all patients or limited to patients in whom metaplasia persisted; and esophagectomy. Ablation modalities modeled included radiofrequency, argon plasma coagulation, multipolar electrocoagulation, and photodynamic therapy.
Results
Endoscopic ablation for patients with HGD could increase life expectancy by 3 quality-adjusted years at an incremental cost of <$6,000 compared with no intervention. Patients with LGD or no dysplasia can also be optimally managed with ablation, but continued surveillance after eradication of metaplasia is expensive. If ablation permanently eradicates ≥28% of LGD or 40% of nondysplastic metaplasia, ablation would be preferred to surveillance.
Conclusions
Endoscopic ablation could be the preferred strategy for managing patients with BE with HGD. Ablation might also be preferred in subjects with LGD or no dysplasia, but the cost effectiveness depends on the long-term effectiveness of ablation and whether surveillance endoscopy can be discontinued after successful ablation. As further postablation data become available, the optimal management strategy will be clarified.
Abbreviations used in this paper: BE, Barrett's esophagus, CMS, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CR, complete remission, dQALY, discounted quality-adjusted life-years, EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, HGD, high-grade dysplasia, ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, LGD, low-grade dysplasia, ND BE, nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus, PDT, photodynamic therapy, QALYs, quality-adjusted life-years, RFA, radiofrequency ablation, WTP, willingness to pay
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity on page 2387. Learning Objective: Upon completion of this CME exercise, successful learners will be able to analyze current evidence regarding the risk of cancer among patients with Barrett's esophagus, interpret studies of interventions to reduce cancer incidence, and assess current guidelines with respect to emerging data of management of patients with Barrett's esophagus.
Conflicts of interest The authors disclose the following: R. Madanick has received an honorarium and N. Shaheen and J. Inadomi have received research support from Barrx Medical, maker of the radiofrequency ablation device. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding Supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA106773 - JMI) and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24 DK080941 - JMI), National Institutes of Health. Supported by an unrestricted research grant from BARRX.
PII: S0016-5085(09)00348-5
doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.062
© 2009 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Continuing Medical Education Exam 1, June 2009 , 04 May 2009

