Peginterferon alfa-2b and Ribavirin: Effective in Patients With Hepatitis C Who Failed Interferon alfa/Ribavirin Therapy
Background & Aims
Treatment with peginterferon alfa and ribavirin produces a sustained virologic response (SVR) in approximately 60% of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. Alternate options are needed for patients who relapse or do not respond to therapy.
Methods
This prospective, international, multicenter, open-label study evaluated efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2b (1.5 μg/kg/wk) plus weight-based ribavirin (800–1400 mg/day) in 2333 chronic HCV-infected patients with significant fibrosis/cirrhosis whose previous interferon alfa/ribavirin therapy failed. Patients with undetectable HCV-RNA at treatment week (TW) 12 received 48 weeks of therapy; patients with detectable HCV-RNA at TW12 could enter maintenance studies at TW18; 188 patients with low/detectable HCV-RNA at TW12 continued therapy at the investigator's request.
Results
Overall, 22% of the patients attained SVR (56% with undetectable HCV-RNA and 12% with low/detectable HCV-RNA at TW12). SVR was better in relapsers (38%) than nonresponders (14%), regardless of previous treatment, and in patients previously treated with interferon-alfa/ribavirin (25%) than peginterferon alfa-ribavirin (17%). Predictors of response in patients with undetectable HCV-RNA at TW12 were genotype (2/3 vs 1, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 2.4; P < .0001), fibrosis score (F2 vs F4; OR, 2.2; F3 vs F4; OR, 1.7; P < .0001), and baseline viral load (≤600,000 vs >600,000 IU/mL; OR, 1.4; P = .0223). These factors plus previous treatment and response were overall predictors of SVR. Safety was similar among fibrosis groups.
Conclusions
Peginterferon alfa-2b plus weight-based ribavirin is effective and safe in patients who failed interferon alfa/ribavirin therapy. Genotype, baseline viral load, and fibrosis stage were predictors of response.
Abbreviations used in this paper: EPIC, Evaluation of PegIntron in Control of Hepatitis C Cirrhosis, EVR, early virologic response, HCV, hepatitis C virus, IFN, interferon, LLD, lower limit of detection, PCR, polymerase chain reaction, PEG-IFN, peginterferon, SVR, sustained virologic response, WBD, weight-based dose
Conflicts of Interest The authors disclose the following: T. Poynard, M. Colombo, S. Flamm, T. Berg E. Schiff, E. J. Heathcote, A. Craxi, M. Silva, and W. Schmidt are members of the speakers bureau for Schering–Plough; A. Craxi, E. J. Heathcote, and W. Schmidt are members of the speakers bureau for Roche; T. Poynard, M. Colombo, E. Schiff, M. Diago, S. Flamm, T. Berg, A. Craxi, M. Silva, E. J. Heathcote, and F. Gonçales receive research support from Schering–Plough; A. Craxi receives research support from Roche; S. Flamm receives research support from Valeant and serves on the speakers bureau for Novartis; M. Colombo, E. Schiff, A. Craxi, J. Bruix, and E. J. Heathcote are consultants for Schering–Plough; A. Craxi is a consultant for Roche; L. Griffel, M. Burroughs, C. Brass, J. K. Albrecht, and P. Mukhopadhyay are employees of Schering–Plough Research Institute and stock holders of Schering–Plough; R. Moreno-Otero, F. Carrilho, R. Terg, P. Bedossa, and T. McGarrity have nothing to disclose. Study participants were told of investigators' conflicts of interests.
Funding Schering–Plough Research Institute fully supported the study. Role of study sponsor: Schering–Plough Research Institute played a major role in the study design. They collected, analyzed, and performed the initial interpretation of all data. All the authors provided input and agreed to the final interpretation. The decision to submit the report was made by Schering–Plough Research Institute in conjunction with the publication committee.
The complete list of the EPIC Study Group membership appears in the online Appendix.
PII: S0016-5085(09)00102-4
doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.039
© 2009 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


