The Incidence, Prevalence, and Outcomes of Patients With Gastroparesis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, From 1996 to 2006
Background & Aims
The epidemiology of gastroparesis is unknown. We aimed to determine the incidence, prevalence, and outcome of gastroparesis in the community.
Methods
Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a medical records linkage system in Olmsted County, Minnesota, we identified county residents with potential gastroparesis. The complete medical records were reviewed by a gastroenterologist. Three diagnostic definitions were used: (1) definite gastroparesis, delayed gastric emptying by standard scintigraphy and typical symptoms for more than 3 months; (2) probable gastroparesis, typical symptoms and food retention on endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal study; (3) possible gastroparesis, typical symptoms alone or delayed gastric emptying by scintigraphy without gastrointestinal symptoms. Poisson regression was used to assess the association of incidence rates with age, sex, and calendar period.
Results
Among 3604 potential cases of gastroparesis, 83 met diagnostic criteria for definite gastroparesis, 127 definite plus probable gastroparesis, and 222 any of the 3 definitions of gastroparesis. The age-adjusted (to the 2000 US white population) incidence per 100,000 person-years of definite gastroparesis for the years 1996–2006 was 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–3.8) for men and 9.8 (95% CI, 7.5–12.1) for women. The age-adjusted prevalence of definite gastroparesis per 100,000 persons on January 1, 2007, was 9.6 (95% CI, 1.8–17.4) for men and 37.8 (95% CI, 23.3–52.4) for women. Overall survival was significantly lower than the age- and sex-specific expected survival computed from the Minnesota white population (P < .05).
Conclusions
Gastroparesis is an uncommon condition in the community but is associated with a poor outcome.
Abbreviations used in this paper: CI, confidence interval, GI, gastrointestinal
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity on page 1445. Learning Objective: Upon completion of this CME activity, the reader should understand the variety of presentations of gastroparesis and the AGA consensus recommendations on diagnosis and management options.
Conflict of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding This study was partly funded by Medtronic.
PII: S0016-5085(08)02305-6
doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.047
© 2009 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Continuing Medical Education Exam 2, April 2009 , 25 February 2009

