« Previous
Next »
Gastroenterology
Volume 136, Issue 3
, Pages 842-847.e1
, March 2009
A Fast-Track Program Reduces Complications and Length of Hospital Stay After Open Colonic Surgery
References
- . Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002;183:630–641
- Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2006;93:800–809
- Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005;24:466–477
- Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:271–278
- . Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:501–506
- Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:851–859
- Benefits of early feeding and early hospital discharge in elderly patients undergoing open colon resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:747–752
- Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1497–1504
- Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1354–1362
- A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;245:867–872
- . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213
- . The Declaration of Helsinki: an update on paragraph 30. CMAJ. 2005;173:1052–1053
- . Multiplicity in randomised trials II: subgroup and interim analysis. Lancet. 2005;365:1657–1661
- Care after colonic operation—is it evidence-based? (Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States). J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:45–54
- Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:540–549
- Comparison of ropivacaine-fentanyl patient-controlled epidural analgesia with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for perioperative analgesia and recovery after open colon surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:571–577
- Thoracic epidural analgesia facilitates the restoration of bowel function and dietary intake in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection using a traditional, nonaccelerated, perioperative care program. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:247–252
- . Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94:665–673
- Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238:641–648
- Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1812–1818
- Randomized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1469–1474
- . Readmission rates after a planned hospital stay of 2 versus 3 days in fast-track colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94:890–893
- A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–2059
- Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–484
- Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg. 2005;241:416–423
Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; identifier: NCT00556790.
Dr Muller designed the study, analyzed the data, performed statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript and had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Dr Zalunardo, Dr Hubner, and Dr Clavien participated in the design and coordination of the study and data analyses and helped to draft the manuscript. Dr Demartines designed the study, analyzed the data, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of interest The authors disclose the following: Dr Muller, Dr Clavien, and Dr Demartines have received research support from Fresenius Kabi, Stans, Switzerland. Dr Zalunardo and Dr Hubner disclose no conflicts.
PII: S0016-5085(08)01865-9
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.030
© 2009 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Gastroenterology
Volume 136, Issue 3
, Pages 842-847.e1
, March 2009

