Gastroenterology
Volume 135, Issue 6 , Pages 1877-1891, December 2008

Challenges to the Therapeutic Pipeline for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: End Points and Regulatory Hurdles

  • Michael Camilleri

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to: Michael Camilleri, MD, Mayo Clinic, Charlton 8-110, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
  • ,
  • Lin Chang

      Affiliations

    • Center for Neurobiology of Stress, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, VAGLAHS, Los Angeles, California

Received 18 June 2008; accepted 4 September 2008. published online 13 October 2008.

Recent advances in our understanding of basic neuroenteric mechanisms and the role of effectors and transmitters in the brain-gut axis have provided opportunities to develop new therapeutic agents for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Furthermore, human pharmacodynamic studies utilizing transit, colonic, or rectal sensitivity and brain imaging have been useful in determining therapeutic efficacy (particularly for drugs that act on motor function). This review provides an overview of medications that have not yet been approved for treatment of patients with IBS yet have shown promise in phase IIB trials. These include drugs that act on the serotonin receptor and transporter system: antidepressants, norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, opioids, cholecystokinin antagonists, neurokinin-antagonists, chloride channel activators, guanylate cyclase C agonists, atypical benzodiazepines, probiotics, and antibiotics. The changing landscape in the regulatory approval process has impacted the development of IBS drugs. Guidance documents from regulatory agencies in Europe and the United States have focused on patients' reported outcomes and associated quality of life. After a decade of experience with different end points that have generated some data on psychometric validation and unprecedented information about responsiveness of the binary or global end points to drug therapy, it is necessary to pursue further validation studies before or during pivotal phase IIB or III trials. The hope of providing relief to patients should galvanize all parties to achieve these goals.

Abbreviations used in this paper: 5-HT, serotonin, IBS, irritable bowel syndrome, IBS-C, irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation, IBS-D, irritable bowel syndrome with predominant diarrhea

 

 The authors disclose the following: Dr Camilleri reports consulting for Albireo, Tioga, Dynogen, Axcan, Procter & Gamble, SK Bio-Pharmaceuticals, and Salix. As a consultant with GlaxoSmithKline, he attended a meeting at the FDA in January 2008 regarding end points for irritable bowel syndrome. He has received research grants from Novartis, Theravance, Takeda/Sucampo, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, as well as support for studies in irritable bowel syndrome from National Institutes of Health (RO1-DK-54681). Dr. Chang reports consulting for Albireo, GlaxoSmithKline, Forest, Ironwood, McNeil, Prometheus, Salix, Synergy, Takeda, and Tioga and research grant support from GlaxoSmithKline, Prometheus, Rose Pharma. She also receives funding from the National Institutes of Health for studies in irritable bowel syndrome (RO1 AR46122 and P50 DK64539).

PII: S0016-5085(08)01668-5

doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.005

Gastroenterology
Volume 135, Issue 6 , Pages 1877-1891, December 2008