Gastroenterology
Volume 135, Issue 6 , Pages 1914-1923.e1, December 2008

Thiazolidinedione Therapy Is Not Associated With Increased Colonic Neoplasia Risk in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

  • James D. Lewis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to: James D. Lewis, MD, MSCE, 720 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6021. fax: (215) 573-0813
  • ,
  • Angela M. Capra

      Affiliations

    • Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
  • ,
  • Ninah S. Achacoso

      Affiliations

    • Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
  • ,
  • Assiamira Ferrara

      Affiliations

    • Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
  • ,
  • Theodore R. Levin

      Affiliations

    • Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
  • ,
  • Charles P. Quesenberry Jr

      Affiliations

    • Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
  • ,
  • Laurel A. Habel

      Affiliations

    • Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California

Received 16 May 2008; accepted 4 September 2008. published online 16 September 2008.

Background & Aims

Thiazolidinedione ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), are used to treat diabetes. PPARγ is highly expressed in the colon, and exposure to thiazolidinediones has been proposed to affect the risk for colorectal neoplasia. In vitro models suggest that thiazolidinediones have antineoplastic effects, whereas in vivo studies have produced mixed results: Some indicate an increased risk for intestinal tumors. This study examined the association between PPARγ-targeted therapies and the risk of colonic neoplasia in patients with diabetes.

Methods

We conducted 3 retrospective case-control studies nested within the cohort of diabetic patients who were cared for within the Kaiser Permanente of Northern California system from 1994 to 2005. Case subjects were those with colonic neoplasia identified at the time of colonoscopy (study 1), sigmoidoscopy (study 2), or at follow-up lower endoscopy (study 3). Controls had no neoplasia identified at the endoscopic examination. A minimum of 1 year of therapy was used to define medication exposure.

Results

Fourteen thousand eighty-six patients were included. Among patients undergoing colonoscopy, there was an inverse association between thiazolidinedione exposure and prevalence of neoplasia (adjusted odd ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57–0.92); however, this was not evident among patients without anemia (adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64–1.49). Significant associations between any or long-term thiazolidinedione use and colonic neoplasia were not observed among patients undergoing sigmoidoscopy or serial lower endoscopies.

Conclusions

These results indicate that thiazolidinedione therapy is not associated with an increased risk for colonic neoplasia.

Abbreviations used in this paper: PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ, TZD, thiazolidinedione

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors disclose the following: Supported by NIH grant CA102599. Drs Lewis, Habel, Ferrara, and Quesenberry have received research funding from Takeda. Dr Lewis has received research support from GlaxoSmithKline. Drs Habel and Ferrara have received research support from Eli Lilly. Dr Habel has also received research support from Merck.

PII: S0016-5085(08)01667-3

doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.004

Gastroenterology
Volume 135, Issue 6 , Pages 1914-1923.e1, December 2008