Gastroenterology
Volume 135, Issue 1 , Pages 82-90, July 2008

Random Comparison of Guaiac and Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer in a Screening Population

  • Leo G. van Rossum

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to: Leo G.M. van Rossum, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Geert Groteplein 8, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. fax: +31243540103.
  • ,
  • Anne F. van Rijn

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Robert J. Laheij

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Martijn G. van Oijen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Paul Fockens

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Han H. van Krieken

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Andre L. Verbeek

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Jan B. Jansen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Evelien Dekker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 25 October 2007; accepted 20 March 2008. published online 26 March 2008.

Background & Aims: Despite poor performance, guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (G-FOBT) are most frequently implemented for colorectal cancer screening. Immunochemical fecal occult blood tests (I-FOBT) are claimed to perform better, without randomized comparison in screening populations. Our aim was to randomly compare G-FOBT with I-FOBT in a screening population. Methods: We conducted a population-based study on a random sample of 20,623 individuals 50–75 years of age, randomized to either G-FOBT (Hemoccult-II) or I-FOBT (OC-Sensor). Tests and invitations were sent together. For I-FOBT, the standard cutoff of 100 ng/ml was used. Positive FOBTs were verified with colonoscopy. Advanced adenomas were defined as ≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia, or ≥20% villous component. Results: There were 10,993 tests returned: 4836 (46.9%) G-FOBTs and 6157 (59.6%) I-FOBTs. The participation rate difference was 12.7% (P < .01). Of G-FOBTs, 117 (2.4%) were positive versus 339 (5.5%) of I-FOBTs. The positivity rate difference was 3.1% (P < .01). Cancer and advanced adenomas were found, respectively, in 11 and 48 of G-FOBTs and in 24 and 121 of I-FOBTs. Differences in positive predictive value for cancer and advanced adenomas and cancer were, respectively, 2.1% (P = .4) and −3.6% (P = .5). Differences in specificities favor G-FOBT and were, respectively, 2.3% (P < .01) and −1.3% (P < .01). Differences in intention-to-screen detection rates favor I-FOBT and were, respectively, 0.1% (P < .05) and 0.9% (P < .01). Conclusions: The number-to-scope to find 1 cancer was comparable between the tests. However, participation and detection rates for advanced adenomas and cancer were significantly higher for I-FOBT. G-FOBT significantly underestimates the prevalence of advanced adenomas and cancer in the screening population compared with I-FOBT.

Abbreviations used in this paper: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval, CRC, colorectal cancer, FOBT, fecal occult blood test, G-FOBT, guaiac-based fecal occult blood test, I-FOBT, immunochemical fecal occult blood test, Negatives, FOBT-negative patients, Positives, FOBT-positive patients, PPV, positive predictive value

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW: number 50-50115-98-060, project 63000004). This organization had no influence on any aspect relevant to this study.

 This trial is registered under ISRCTN57917442 at Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com).

PII: S0016-5085(08)00478-2

doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.040

Gastroenterology
Volume 135, Issue 1 , Pages 82-90, July 2008