American Gastroenterological Association Technical Review on the Management of Hepatitis C
Article Outline
- Screening
- Natural History
- Pretreatment Diagnostic Considerations
- Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C
- Histologic Response to Antiviral Therapy
- Effect of Antiviral Therapy on Clinical Outcomes
- Side Effects of Therapy
- Treatment Recommendations
- Other Patient Populations
- Patients with mild hepatitis C and/or normal ALT levels
- Fibrosis/cirrhosis
- Previous relapse and nonresponder patient populations
- Acute hepatitis C
- Injection drug use
- Alcoholism
- Black patients
- Hematologic disorders
- Children
- End-stage renal disease
- Extrahepatic disease
- HIV and HCV coinfection
- Liver transplantation
- Other Medical Therapies
- Alternative Therapies
- Other Patient Populations
- Concluding Remarks
- Acknowledgment
- References
- Copyright
Abbreviations used in this paper: CI, confidence interval , EVR, early virologic response , HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy , HAI, histologic activity index , HIV, human immunodeficiency virus , IFN, interferon , MU, million units , OR, odds ratio , PEG, pegylated , RCT, randomized controlled trial , SVR, sustained virologic response
In the United States, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection accounts for approximately 40% of all chronic liver disease, results in an estimated 8000–10,000 deaths annually, and is the most frequent indication for liver transplantation.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, conducted between 1988 and 1994 among 21,000 adults, revealed antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) in 1.8%, three fourths of whom had detectable serum HCV RNA levels.8 Generalized to the population of the United States, these findings suggest that approximately 4 million persons have been infected and that 3 million have chronic HCV infection. Among those aged 40–59 years and among black subjects, the prevalence of anti-HCV was even higher. Moreover, the results of such serologic surveys may actually provide conservatively low estimates, failing to include representative proportions of high-risk populations such as injection drug users, incarcerated persons, and homeless persons. Projections based on the current prevalence of infection and anticipated rates of progression raise concerns over the potential impact of HCV during the next 2 decades. A computer cohort simulation of the US population for 2010–2019 suggests that the morbidity and mortality associated with chronic hepatitis C will increase dramatically, resulting in 165,900 deaths from chronic liver disease, 27,200 deaths from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and $10.7 billion in direct medical expenditures related to HCV.5, 9, 10, 11, 12 On a global scale, based on current estimates that as many as 175 million persons are infected with HCV, the morbidity, mortality, and current and projected health care costs associated with HCV infection are staggering.
These alarming statistics and projections focus attention on the critical need to prevent and control HCV infection. Although effective vaccines to prevent HCV infection are not likely to be practical, virtual elimination of HCV from the blood supply by donor screening and changes in behavior to prevent HCV infection associated with injection drug use have reduced dramatically the frequency of new infections.13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 Still, because of the residua of several decades of high-incidence acute hepatitis C in at-risk populations, a large reservoir of chronic HCV infection persists.20 Fortunately, substantial progress in antiviral therapy has taken place; this chronic viral disease can be cured in a substantial proportion of patients, and the ultimate impact of hepatitis C is likely to be minimized by these and future advances in management.21
To support this technical review,22 a comprehensive search of electronic databases (including MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, American College of Physicians Journal Club, British Medical Journal Clinical Evidence, EMB Reviews, CINAHL, EMBASE, and HealthSTAR) was performed by a professional evidence-based medicine company to identify relevant articles from 1990 to 2003. The search was restricted to articles involving human studies that were available in English. Additional relevant articles published after the search was completed that were identified by the authors were also included.
Screening
In the United States, of the anticipated 3–4 million persons with hepatitis C, only approximately half a million have been treated, and the majority have not been identified. Most diagnoses of chronic hepatitis C are made by medical serendipity, when persons with asymptomatic hepatitis C attempt to donate blood or when they have blood drawn as part of routine medical evaluations or during insurance physical examinations. Because the frequency of hepatitis C in the general population is low (<2%) and because screening tests for anti-HCV, like any other diagnostic test, have a fixed frequency of nonspecificity, routine screening of all asymptomatic adults (who have a low prior probability of HCV infection) is not recommended. For example, among asymptomatic blood donors with an anti-HCV prevalence of 1%–2%, a screening test that is 98%–99% specific is likely to identify as many persons with false-positive as true-positive reactivity. In contrast, among high-risk groups with a high prior probability of true infection (eg, persons who underwent transfusion before 1992 [when donor screening for anti-HCV was introduced], those with a past or recent history of injection drug use, those with hemophilia who received clotting factors before 1987 [when processing to inactivate viruses was introduced], those with frequent percutaneous exposures, those with clinical or biochemical evidence for chronic liver disease, or immigrants from countries with a high prevalence of HCV infection),23 true-positive results outweigh false-negative results so substantially that a positive test result is highly predictive of the presence of infection. In such populations, even among asymptomatic persons, diagnostic testing for HCV infection has been recommended by the US Public Health Service, expert panels, and professional medical specialty societies.23, 24, 25, 26
Recently, the US Preventive Services Task Force concluded, based on a literature-based analysis, that even among high-risk groups and even though antiviral therapy is effective in treating hepatitis C, insufficient data exist to demonstrate that screening in this setting improves long-term outcomes.27, 28 Although such long-term outcome data have yet to be developed, other professional societies and the American Gastroenterological Association take issue with the conclusion of the US Preventive Services Task Force that data do not warrant a recommendation for screening of high-risk persons for hepatitis C. Based on many factors (the documented progression, albeit slow in most cases, of chronic hepatitis C to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, HCC, liver transplantation, and/or death7, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39; the documented benefits of antiviral therapy in curing this viral disease in half of treated persons [side effects notwithstanding]40, 41, 42; the slowing among treated persons in progression of fibrosis and even the reversal of fibrosis and cirrhosis among treated patients43, 44, 45, 46, 47; the potential suggested by some reports for a reduction in HCC among those who achieve sustained virologic responses [SVRs] to antiviral therapy48, 49; and the impact of antiviral therapy on prolonging survival50), the American Gastroenterological Association advocates strongly the position that members of such high-risk groups, even those who are asymptomatic, should be screened for evidence of hepatitis C infection. Patients in these high-risk groups, and especially those with an established diagnosis of hepatitis C, should be counseled about the natural history of hepatitis C; availability, effectiveness, and side effects of therapy; avoidance of alcohol; risk of sexual transmission; and US Public Health Service recommendations for hepatitis A and B vaccination.23
Recommendation category: III22, 51 (Table 1)
Table 1. Coding System for Hierarchy of Evidence Adopted by the American Gastroenterological Association
| Level of evidence | |
|---|---|
| I | Well-designed RCTs |
| II-1a | Well-designed controlled trials with pseudo-randomization |
| II-1b | Well-designed controlled trials with no randomization |
| II-2a | Well-designed cohort (prospective) study with concurrent controls |
| II-2b | Well-designed cohort (prospective) study with historical controls |
| II-2c | Well-designed cohort (retrospective) study with concurrent controls |
| II-3 | Well-designed case-control (retrospective) study |
| III | Large differences from comparisons between times and/or places with and without intervention (in some circumstances these may be equivalent to level II or I) |
| IV | Opinions of respected authorities based on clinical experience; descriptive studies; reports of expert committees |
Natural History
After acute HCV infection, most of which is asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic,52, 53 recovery is the exception; persistent infection occurs in approximately 85% of cases. Among those with chronic hepatitis C, however, the rate of disease progression is variable, and, to some extent, assessments of the natural history of chronic hepatitis C are colored by selection and referral biases; hepatitis C appears to be a more progressive disease in liver specialty clinics and tertiary care centers30 but much less so in community practices.29 Retrospective and prospective studies have suggested that progression to cirrhosis during the first 20 years of infection occurs in approximately 20% of patients with transfusion-associated hepatitis and of patients seen in liver clinics30, 54 but in only 7% of patients with community-acquired hepatitis C, only 4% of blood donors with HCV infection, and 2%–4% of young children with transfusion-associated chronic hepatitis C.29, 55 A dramatic dichotomy in progression rates, not explained by demonstrable differences in HCV genotype or other viral factors, is reflected by the 0–2% progression to cirrhosis among young women followed up for 17–20 years after acquiring HCV infection from contaminated anti-D Rh globulin56, 57 versus the 30% progression rate in less than 11 years among patients with agammaglobulinemia who received HCV-contaminated intravenous immunoglobulin.58
Estimates based on serial histologic assessments over time or single histologic assessments coupled with assumptions about the duration of HCV infection have suggested that the rate of fibrosis in hepatitis C can be slow, moderate, or rapid32, 59, 60, 61; however, progression of fibrosis may not be linear,60, 61, 62 and determinants of the rate of progression are not known definitively. Potential contributing factors to progressive fibrosis include excessive alcohol intake, concomitant diseases associated with liver injury (eg, hepatitis B, hemochromatosis, steatohepatitis), concomitant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, advanced histologic grade (ie, necroinflammatory activity), persistently elevated aminotransferase activity, male sex, older age, ethnicity (in some studies, not others), obesity, hepatic steatosis, immunosuppression, and certain HLA haplotypes.32, 54, 59, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79
Among patients with chronic hepatitis C and compensated cirrhosis, the 10-year survival rate is approximately 80%35 but is lower in other experiences (eg, 8-year survival of 67%80); however, the 10-year survival rate decreases to 50% after the first clinical episode of hepatic decompensation (eg, ascites, bleeding esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy).35 In compensated cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C, the annual rate of hepatic decompensation is 4%–5% and of death is 2%–6%.35, 81 Ominously, the risk of HCC is increased after approximately 3 decades of HCV infection, almost exclusively in the group with cirrhosis. Patients with HCV-associated cirrhosis experience an annual incidence of HCC that ranges between 1% and 4% and is up to 7% in some extreme experiences.35, 36, 37, 81, 82 Currently, one third of all cases of HCC in the United States and 90% of cases of HCC in Japan are associated with chronic hepatitis C; the incidence of HCV-associated HCC has tripled over the past decade in the United States and quadrupled over the past 4 decades in Japan.37, 52, 83
Ultimately, chronic hepatitis C progresses gradually, slowly in some and more rapidly in others. Ideally, with the current limitations and associated side effects of antiviral therapy, treatment should be advised for patients with progressive disease but foregone or postponed in those with early or inactive disease.26 Of all clinical variables, histologic grade and stage are the most helpful in distinguishing between those who need therapy and those who do not. Because, currently, almost all patients in whom hepatitis C is identified have had the disease for 2–3 decades, liver biopsy provides an assessment of the degree of severity and stage of progression during the previous decades. In addition, histologic analysis of a baseline liver biopsy specimen is valuable not only to estimate the degree of liver injury during previous decades but also prognostically to predict the rate of histologic progression over the future 1–2 decades.84
Pretreatment Diagnostic Considerations
Persons with a reactive enzyme immunoassay for anti-HCV and the presence of HCV RNA should be considered as potential candidates for antiviral therapy.26, 69 Because, currently, antiviral therapy is not recommended for patients with hepatic decompensation, patients who have decompensated cirrhosis (Child–Turcotte–Pugh score ≥7, history of ascites, bleeding esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy) should be excluded.24, 26 A history of severe, uncontrolled psychiatric disorder (eg, severe depression, suicidal ideation) should trigger misgivings about introducing antiviral therapy that can precipitate or aggravate these conditions; however, mild to moderate depression should not be a contraindication.85 In such cases, antidepressant medication and psychiatric monitoring usually suffice to support a patient through antiviral therapy. Substance abuse and excessive alcohol use have been associated with limited treatment compliance and outcome; therefore, decisions about antiviral therapy in injection drug users and alcoholic persons should be linked with counseling, substance withdrawal programs, and, preferably, a sustained period of abstinence.26, 85, 86, 87 Finally, patients with marked leukopenia or thrombocytopenia may not tolerate interferon (IFN), and patients with marked anemia, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, or renal failure may not tolerate ribavirin, which causes dose-dependent hemolytic anemia.85
When antiviral therapy was introduced initially, all supporting clinical trials had been conducted in patients with elevated aminotransferase activity; although persons with sustained, normal aminotransferase levels are less likely to progress histologically than those with elevated serum aminotransferase levels,61, 88, 89, 90, 91 this group responds to antiviral therapy as well as do patients with elevated aminotransferase activity (see following text).92, 93 Testing for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels is an important component of the diagnostic evaluation in patients with chronic hepatitis C, but elevation of ALT and AST levels is not a requirement for therapy.
Virologic Tests for Monitoring Therapy
All candidates for antiviral therapy should be tested for HCV RNA with a quantitative amplification assay, which provides both a baseline level against which to monitor virologic response and a prognostic indicator of the likelihood of response. Patients with very high levels of HCV RNA respond less well to antiviral therapy than do those with lower levels. Both target amplification polymerase chain reaction and signal amplification branched DNA assays are available with ranges of quantitation between 101 and 106 IU/mL.94, 95 These assays are valuable for demonstration of early virologic response (EVR), that is, a ≥2-log10 reduction in HCV RNA levels within 12 weeks of initiating therapy (see following text).41, 96 Because these quantitative assays differ in sensitivity and dynamic range, the same assay should be used before and during antiviral therapy.94, 95 For documentation of a virologic response at the end of therapy (end-of-treatment response) or an SVR ≥6 months after completing therapy, a more sensitive quantitative HCV RNA assay (such as real-time TaqMan polymerase chain reaction, with a sensitivity threshold of ≤50 IU/mL) or a qualitative HCV RNA assay (based on polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification, with lower quantitation limits of ≤50 IU/mL94, 95) is recommended.
All candidates for antiviral therapy should be tested for HCV genotype by serologic immunoassay or molecular determination.42, 94, 95 Among the 6 known HCV genotypes, most patients in the United States have either genotype 1 (approximately 70%–80%) or genotypes 2 and 3 (20%–30%).97, 98, 99, 100 For patients with the more treatment-refractory (SVR ≤40%–50%) genotype 1, a full 48 weeks of therapy with maximum doses of ribavirin (1000–1200 mg/day) is recommended; for patients with the more treatment-favorable (SVR ≥80%) genotypes 2 and 3, 24 weeks of therapy with lower-dose ribavirin (800 mg/day) suffices.26 Patients with genotype 4, uncommonly encountered in the United States but common in Egypt, are intermediate in responsiveness to therapy between that of genotype 1 and genotypes 2 and 3 and are treated for a full 48 weeks with full-dose ribavirin, like patients with genotype 1.100, 101, 102, 103
Liver Biopsy
Neither clinical nor laboratory markers, individually or in combination, predict accurately the degree of necroinflammatory activity or the level of fibrosis in the liver. Therefore, despite sampling error, liver biopsy remains the gold standard for determining histologic grade and stage.84 Patients in whom antiviral therapy is being considered are candidates for liver biopsy to assess the current status of the liver and to provide prognostic information for future disease progression.26, 84 If the biopsy specimen documents the presence of moderate to severe fibrosis (Ishak stage ≥3, METAVIR stage ≥F2; see Table 2),104, 105 progressive fibrosis is likely and antiviral therapy is recommended. If, however, the biopsy specimen demonstrates milder histologic disease, progression may be sufficiently slow to justify monitoring without imminent therapeutic intervention in a proportion of these patients (see Treatment Recommendations).26 Percutaneous liver biopsy is associated with potential complications, including bleeding (1%–3%), pain (20%–30%), bile peritonitis (<1%), pneumothorax (<1%), punctured viscera (<1%), and death.84, 106, 107, 108 Therefore, the threshold for performing liver biopsy may vary with potential for complications (eg, higher in persons with coagulopathy). Furthermore, for patients with genotypes 2 and 3, the likelihood of response is so high and the duration of therapy so much shorter than for genotype 1 that the benefits of treatment may outweigh considerations of disease severity and future potential for progression. Therefore, because of these considerations, some authorities forego a baseline liver biopsy in patients with genotypes 2 and 3, whereas others obtain biopsy specimens before therapy in patients with all genotypes because baseline histology is a predictor of response to therapy that is independent of genotype.84
Table 2. Histologic Scoring Systems for Fibrosis
| Fibrosis | METAVIR105 | Ishak104 |
|---|---|---|
| None | 0 | 0 |
| Portal fibrosis (some) | 1 | 1 |
| Portal fibrosis (most) | 1 | 2 |
| Bridging fibrosis (occasional) | 2 | 3 |
| Bridging fibrosis (marked) | 3 | 4 |
| Incomplete cirrhosis | 4 | 5 |
| Cirrhosis | 4 | 6 |
Finally, obesity109 and/or the presence of hepatic steatosis67, 68, 110 requires histologic evaluation, and steatosis has been shown to be a negative predictor of response to antiviral therapy, especially in patients with genotype 3111 but also in patients with genotype 1.110
Liver biopsies can be performed under ultrasound guidance or by traditional percussive and auscultative localization. Similarly, the procedure can be performed by needle aspiration or by automated biopsy gun. Data to support one approach over another are insufficient to justify mandating a single approach in all cases and by all practitioners, regardless of levels of skill and experience. Every attempt should be made to yield a nonfragmented biopsy core of at least 1 cm in length.
Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C
Therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection has evolved substantially during the past decade. Initial therapy with IFN alfa had limited success, but the addition of ribavirin and later the pegylation of IFN led to marked improvements in response rates. The current standard of care, therefore, is pegylated IFN (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin,26 and the rationale for this selection will be reviewed. In addition, the experience with earlier regimens will be reviewed.
IFN Alfa
Initially, when treatment with IFN was first introduced, a 6-month course of thrice weekly injections of 3 million units (MU) was approved. In early studies, the primary end point was a biochemical response, defined as normalization of ALT levels.112, 113 Two meta-analyses, one of 52 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of treatment with IFN for 3–6 months114 and another of 33 RCTs of treatment for a full 6 months,115 showed that IFN monotherapy resulted in normalization of ALT levels by the end of treatment in 51.2% and 45% of subjects, respectively, but in only 21.7% and 21% of subjects, respectively, 3–6 months after discontinuing therapy.
When virologic assays became available to detect HCV RNA, response rates were observed to be lower than those reported with less stringent biochemical end points. In a meta-analysis of 32 RCTs between 1986 and 1996 among patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving IFN alfa-2b (at least 2 MU 3 times weekly for 24 weeks), IFN compared with placebo or no treatment was evaluated in 20 trials, and different doses, durations, or strategies of treatment were compared in 12 trials.116 Normalization of ALT levels at the end of treatment was seen in 47% of treated patients compared with 4% of controls (odds ratio [OR], 25.1; P < .0001) and 6 months after stopping treatment in 23% of treated patients compared with 2% of controls (OR, 17.8; P < .0001). End-of-treatment virologic responses, however, were observed in only 29% of treated patients compared with 5% of controls (OR, 9.4; P < .001), and 6-month posttreatment SVRs were documented in 8% of treated patients compared with 1% of controls (OR, 8.6; P < .001). Higher doses, more frequent injection schedules, different preparations, and induction therapy with high initial doses failed to improve virologic responsiveness. In contrast, a doubling of the duration of therapy to 12 months increased the frequency of SVR to approximately 20%.116 In addition, several studies demonstrated lower response rates among patients infected with genotype 1, cirrhotic patients, and previous nonresponders to IFN.117 Among patients who achieved an SVR after IFN monotherapy, biochemical, virologic, and histologic responses were maintained for up to 7–10 years in almost all cases118, 119 and HCV RNA levels were undetectable in the liver in 27 of 27 patients tested, suggesting that SVR is tantamount to cure.118
IFN Alfa and Ribavirin
The addition of the synthetic guanosine analogue ribavirin to IFN was a major breakthrough in the treatment of HCV infection. Although ribavirin monotherapy was shown to be ineffective,120, 121, 122 pilot studies had suggested that combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin was more effective than IFN alone.117, 123 A small, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT showed an SVR in 18 of 50 patients (36%) in the IFN alfa-2b and ribavirin group compared with 9 of 50 patients (18%) in the IFN and placebo group (P = .047).124
Several landmark studies then followed that consistently demonstrated the dramatically improved responses to combination therapy, especially for patients with genotypes 2 and 3.125, 126, 127, 128, 129 The studies by McHutchison et al and Poynard et al also reinforced the importance of longer-duration therapy for 48 weeks in patients with genotype 1 infection.126, 127 As noted previously, although rare in the United States, genotype 4 HCV infection is common in other parts of the world (eg, Egypt) and, like genotype 1, genotype 4 is more refractory to treatment.101, 102, 103 Predictors of response to therapy in large RCTs are displayed in Table 3.
Table 3. Predictors of Response to Antiviral Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis C
| Regimen | Non-genotype 1 | Low HCV RNA level | Absence of cirrhosis | Female sex | 48 weeks of therapy | Age 40 years or younger | Body surface area ≤2 m2 | ALT level ≥3 times the upper limit of normal | Lighter body weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFN alfa-2b/ribavirin126 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| IFN alfa-2b/ribavirin127 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| PEG-IFN alfa-2a 180 μg142 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.5 μg/kg145 | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||
| PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.5 μg/kg + ribavirin40 | ✓ | ✓ | a | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| PEG-IFN alfa-2a 180 μg + ribavirin41 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| PEG-IFN alfa-2a 180 μg + ribavirin42 | ✓ | b | b |
a Absence of cirrhosis and bridging fibrosis. |
b For genotype 1 (not for genotype 2 and 3). |
A systematic review by Kjaergard et al in 2001 for the Cochrane Collaboration included data from 6 trials in which patients received IFN monotherapy or IFN/ribavirin combination therapy.130 Compared with IFN monotherapy, combination therapy reduced the nonresponse rate (absence of SVR) by 26% in naive patients (relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70–0.78). This systematic review also summarized the clinical outcomes for the patients in these 6 trials. In 6 recipients of combination therapy and in 12 recipients of IFN monotherapy, cirrhosis developed despite therapy, as assessed histologically by posttreatment liver biopsy specimens; however, not surprisingly given the brief duration of monitoring in these trials, clinical features of decompensated cirrhosis did not occur in any of the patients. HCC developed in 1 patient who received IFN monotherapy, but none of the patients in either group underwent liver transplantation. One recipient of IFN monotherapy committed suicide, and 1 accidental death occurred in both intervention arms. No significant difference was observed in liver-related morbidity or all-cause mortality after treatment in the combination therapy group versus the IFN monotherapy group, whether cirrhotic subjects were included or excluded from the analysis (Peto OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.19–1.06] and Peto OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.04–2.10], respectively). Of course, these studies were performed in patients with well-compensated hepatitis C, and the duration of follow-up monitoring in these time-limited trials is much too short to expect a difference in hepatic decompensation or death in a disease whose evolution usually requires decades, not months.
Despite the established contribution of ribavirin to the efficacy of IFN therapy, the mechanism of action of ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C remains controversial. Among the suggested, but not proven, roles for ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C are an immunologic modulation (shift from a Th2 to a Th1 response, suppression of interleukin-10 synthesis), inhibition of host inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity, depletion of intracellular guanosine triphosphate pools, induction of mutational catastrophe, or a moderate, transient, early direct antiviral effect.131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140 When used with PEG-IFN, ribavirin has been shown to yield a very short-lived, <1-log10 reduction in HCV RNA levels early during therapy140 and to increase the slope of the second-phase decline, not influencing the first-phase decline (see Antiviral Therapy and Viral Kinetics) in treatment-associated levels of HCV RNA.141 Antiviral kinetic modeling supports a direct antiviral effect and excludes an immunomodulatory role for ribavirin.141
PEG-IFN Alfa Monotherapy
The attachment of polyethylene glycol to the IFN molecule is the most recent innovation in the treatment of HCV infection. Pegylation reduces the degradation and clearance, prolonging the half-life, of IFN, permitting less frequent, weekly dosing while maintaining higher, sustained IFN levels. In the initial studies of PEG-IFN, including dose-ranging studies, monotherapy was evaluated.142, 143, 144, 145 The two PEG-IFNs were studied: (1) PEG-IFN alfa-2b, a 12-kilodalton linear molecule with a mean terminal half-life of 40 hours and a mean clearance of 94 mL
·
h−1
·
kg−1, administered on the basis of weight (1.5-μg/kg dose), and (2) PEG-IFN alfa-2a, a 40-kilodalton, branched molecule with a terminal half-life of 80 hours and a mean clearance of 22 mL
·
h−1
·
kg−1, administered at a fixed, 180-μg dose. These 2 PEG-IFNs each doubled the SVR achieved with their nonpegylated counterparts.142, 144, 145 These studies were encouraging, because they demonstrated not only improvement over nonpegylated IFN monotherapy but also, in some studies142, 144 but not all,146 similarity to SVRs achieved with nonpegylated IFN/ribavirin combination regimens. Thus, these studies set the stage for clinical trials to follow and the anticipation that combination therapy with PEG-IFN and ribavirin would be even more effective. Predictors of response to therapy in the large RCTs of PEG-IFN are displayed in Table 3.
Of note, one of the PEG-IFN monotherapy trials was the first substantive prospective study confined to patients with compensated cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis.143 Post hoc analyses of data from previous studies had suggested that cirrhosis was a predictor of reduced responsiveness,126, 127, 142 and safety concerns had been expressed over treating cirrhotic patients who had leukopenia and thrombocytopenia associated with hypersplenism. This study, however, showed that PEG-IFN monotherapy was both well tolerated and effective (yielding an SVR in 30%) in cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C.143
The current role of PEG-IFN monotherapy is imprecisely defined. Although PEG-IFN monotherapy has been recommended for patients with contraindications to ribavirin (eg, those with renal insufficiency, hemoglobinopathies, and ischemic cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease), no clinical trials have been reported to date in these populations. For patients with contraindications to ribavirin but who have indications for antiviral therapy, PEG-IFN represents the best available treatment. Dosing of PEG-IFN should be reduced in patients on dialysis (see End-Stage Renal Disease).
PEG-IFN and Ribavirin
The most recent large clinical trials have focused on treatment with PEG-IFN and ribavirin.40, 41, 42 The earlier two of these studies, involving a uniform 48 weeks of therapy for all patients, have yielded the highest SVRs reported.40, 41 At a weight-based, 1.5-μg/kg dose of PEG-IFN alfa-2b and a fixed, 180-μg dose of PEG-IFN alfa-2a, the overall response rate in clinical trials was 54%–56%; response rates for genotype 1 infection exceeded 40% for the first time and were recorded to be as high as 42%–46%. SVR rates of 76%–82% for genotypes 2 and 3 were also impressive; although these response rates were not necessarily higher than those achieved in these favorable genotypes with nonpegylated IFN plus ribavirin, reduced injection frequency favors PEG-IFN and ribavirin, even for patients with genotypes 2 and 3. Therefore, the combination of PEG-IFN and ribavirin has become the standard of care for the treatment of previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C.26 Predictors of response to therapy in these large RCTs are displayed in Table 3, and the relative weights of the predictors of response in the 3 RCTs of PEG-IFN plus ribavirin are displayed in Table 4. Unfortunately, neither of the PEG-IFN preparations in combination with ribavirin is more effective than standard IFN plus ribavirin in patients weighing ≥85 kg.147 Now that 2 Food and Drug Administration–approved PEG-IFN preparations are available, comparisons have been made between the results of the initial 2 studies with these 2 drugs in an attempt to determine the better therapy. To date, however, the results of contemporaneous head-to-head comparisons have not been reported; therefore, no definitive conclusions can be drawn. Although comparisons are tempting, the 2 initial trials differed substantially in methodological details and in the composition of the patient populations studied. The best treatment arm in the PEG-IFN alfa-2b study involved a weight-based PEG-IFN dose but a low, fixed 800-mg daily dose of ribavirin.40 In the trial of PEG-IFN alfa-2a, a fixed dose of PEG-IFN was used but the daily dose of ribavirin was higher (1000–1200 mg), depending on weight <75 kg or ≥75 kg.41 In the PEG-IFN alfa-2b study, a post hoc analysis demonstrated that an SVR of 61% was achieved in the subgroup whose dose of ribavirin exceeded 10.6 mg/kg.40 Although the study was not prospectively designed or sufficiently powered to address the contribution of more optimal ribavirin weight-based dosing (in fact, the optimal ribavirin dose has not been defined), another retrospective analysis highlighted the potential importance of higher doses of ribavirin and adherence to treatment,148 and a suboptimal dose of ribavirin may have had an impact on response rates in the original PEG-IFN alfa-2b/ribavirin trial. In the realm of tolerability, a reduced frequency of depression was observed when PEG-IFN alfa 2a and ribavirin (22%) were compared with non–PEG-IFN alfa-2b and ribavirin (30%).41 Although the differences in depression between the 2 arms were statistically significant, these data have been criticized because evaluations of depression were subjective, not based on a validated depression instrument. In the PEG-IFN alfa-2b study, depression recorded with a validated instrument was indistinguishable from that observed in patients in the standard IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin arm.40
Table 4. Relative Weighting of Predictors of Response to PEG-IFN Plus Ribavirin Therapy Identified by Multivariable Logistic Regression Analyses in RCTs Conducted in Previously Untreated, Immunocompetent Patients With Compensated Chronic Hepatitis C
| Clinical trial of PEG-IFN/ribavirin | Alfa-2b40 | Alfa-2a41 | Alfa-2a42 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-genotype 1 | (<.0001) | 3.25 | 5.4 |
| HCV RNA ≤2 million copies/mL | (<.0001) | NS | 1.71a |
| Absence of cirrhosis/bridging fibrosis | (<.01) | NS | NS |
| Duration of therapy (for genotype 1) | NA | NA | 2.19 (<.0001) |
| Age 40 years or younger | (<.01) | 2.60 | NS |
| Lighter body weight (≤75 kg) | NS | 1.91 | NS |
a Low HCV RNA level was a significant predictor for the subset analysis of 48-week versus 24-week therapy but not for the subset analysis of standard-dose versus low-dose ribavirin therapy (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.93–2.52; P = .10). |
Similarly, some of the systemic side effects of therapy were less frequent in the PEG-IFN arm than in the standard IFN arm of the PEG-IFN alfa-2a trial but not the PEG-IFN alfa-2b trial41; however, again, the fact that slightly different populations were enrolled in these trials could have accounted for differences in the experience or reporting of such side effects. A considerably larger proportion of subjects with bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis were enrolled in the PEG-IFN alfa-2b/ribavirin trial (29%)40 than in the PEG-IFN alfa-2a/ribavirin trial (12%).41 In addition, a larger proportion of patients in the PEG-IFN alfa-2b/ribavirin trial were from the United States (68%)40 than in the PEG-IFN alfa-2a/ribavirin trial (41%).41 As has been noted previously in studies including American patients, the mean weight of the patients was slightly higher in the PEG-IFN alfa-2b/ribavirin trial (82 kg)40 than in the PEG-IFN alfa-2a/ribavirin trial (79.8 kg)41; theoretically, this could have favored PEG-IFN alfa-2a/ribavirin. Similarly, the proportion of patients with genotype 1 and high-level HCV RNA levels was imbalanced between the 2 trials, favoring PEG-IFN alfa-2a/ribavirin.41 Whether one of these PEG-IFN/ribavirin regimens or weight-based modifications of the 2 regimens will prove to be superior is the focus of ongoing trials.
In both of these initial studies, all patients were treated for 48 weeks40, 41; neither trial addressed the potential for shorter-duration therapy in patients with HCV genotypes 2 and 3. Moreover, PEG-IFN plus ribavirin had proven so effective in preliminary trials that, potentially, full-dose ribavirin might not be necessary and shorter-duration therapy might suffice even for patients with genotype 1. Therefore, in a subsequent registration trial reported by Hadziyannis et al, both the duration of treatment and the dose of ribavirin were evaluated.42 In this RCT of PEG-IFN alfa-2a (180 μg once a week) plus ribavirin, patients were randomized into 4 groups to be treated for either 24 or 48 weeks and to receive either 800 mg daily or 1000–1200 mg daily (based on weight) of ribavirin. In this study, a high frequency of SVR occurred in patients with genotypes 2 and 3 regardless of the regimen, but optimal frequencies of SVR in genotype 1 (52%, the highest recorded to date) required longer-duration and full-dose ribavirin, independent of the level of HCV RNA (Table 5). Among participants in this trial of PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy, levels of HCV RNA had little impact on frequency of SVR in patients with genotypes 2 and 3, but SVR in patients with genotype 1 treated for a full 48 weeks and with full-dose ribavirin was only 47% for those with HCV RNA levels >2 million copies/mL but as high as 65% for those with HCV RNA levels ≤2 million copies/mL. Therefore, this study supports published recommendations26, 69 that patients with genotype 1 require 48 weeks of therapy with higher doses of ribavirin, while patients with genotypes 2 and 3 can be treated for only 24 weeks and with only 800 mg daily of ribavirin. An RCT of 24 versus 48 weeks of treatment with PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin limited to patients with genotypes 2 and 3 demonstrated that 24 weeks of therapy suffices for this PEG-IFN preparation as well.149 Moreover, in some patients with genotypes 2 and 3, 12 weeks of combination treatment (albeit with full-dose, weight-based ribavirin) may suffice.150
Table 5. SVR Rates in the Trial Conducted by Hadziyannis et al42 in Which Duration of Therapy and Dose of Ribavirin Were Evaluated in Patients Receiving PEG-IFN Alfa-2a/Ribavirin Combination Therapy
| PEG-IFN alfa-2a plus ribavirin (mg/day) | No. | No. of weeks | SVR (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype 1 | Genotypes 2 and 3 | |||
| 800 | 207 | 24 | 29 | 84 |
| 1000/1200 | 280 | 24 | 42 | 81 |
| 800 | 361 | 48 | 41 | 79 |
| 1000/1200 | 436 | 48 | 52a | 80b |
a For patients with genotype 1, 48 weeks of therapy was significantly more effective than 24 weeks of therapy (P < .001), and standard-dose ribavirin was significantly more effective than reduced-dose ribavirin (P = .005). |
b For patients with genotypes 2 and 3, 48-week duration and standard-dose ribavirin therapy were no more effective than 24-week duration and low-dose ribavirin therapy (P > .2). |
Included in the large study by Hadziyannis et al42 of duration of PEG-IFN therapy and dose of ribavirin was a small cohort of 36 patients with genotype 4. None of 5 responded to low-dose ribavirin/short-duration combination therapy, 8 of 12 (67%) responded to full-dose ribavirin/short-duration combination therapy, 5 of 8 (63%) responded to low-dose ribavirin/long-duration combination therapy, and 9 of 11 (82%) responded to full-dose ribavirin/long-duration combination therapy. Thus, although genotype 4 appeared to be more responsive than genotype 1, full-course/full-dose therapy, which can yield SVR rates comparable to those achieved in patients with genotypes 2 and 3, is recommended.
Antiviral Therapy and Viral Kinetics
Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that the reduction in HCV RNA levels during IFN therapy follows a 2-phase pattern. Levels decrease rapidly, declining steeply during the first 2–3 days, consistent with inhibition of HCV replication and/or release; thereafter and lasting for many months, the slope of HCV reduction becomes less steep, which is believed to reflect a different antiviral mechanism (ie, the loss of infected hepatocytes).151, 152, 153, 154, 155 Because SVR has been shown to be more likely after favorable early viral kinetics (ie, a more rapid and profound reduction in HCV RNA levels), induction therapy (high-dose, more frequent IFN injections for the first several months) was postulated as an approach to achieve higher SVR rates; however, as noted previously, induction therapy is not more effective than standard therapy in achieving SVR.116, 154 As a predictor of SVR, however, an EVR is a valuable clinical milestone, as demonstrated convincingly for data from individual studies and for data pooled from the registration trials of PEG-IFN plus ribavirin.41, 96, 156 Achieving an SVR is confined to the subgroup who demonstrate an EVR, defined as a ≥2-log10 reduction in HCV RNA levels during the first 12 weeks of therapy. Among those with an EVR, the likelihood of an ultimate SVR is approximately 70%. As a negative predictor, EVR is an even more robust predictor. In the absence of an EVR, the likelihood of an SVR is approximately 0–2%.156 Furthermore, Davis et al96 reported that, among 380 patients with a ≥2-log10 reduction in HCV RNA levels during the first 12 weeks of therapy, an SVR was achieved ultimately in 84% of those in whom the 12-week HCV RNA level was undetectable by polymerase chain reaction, compared with in only 21% of those in whom the 12-week HCV RNA level was still detectable.
Another important determinant of responsiveness to antiviral therapy is adherence (especially important in patients with genotype 1). In a retrospective analysis of data collected in the large registration trials of standard IFN and ribavirin, McHutchison et al148 found that SVR was more likely in patients who had taken at least 80% of all projected IFN injections and at least 80% of all ribavirin capsules for at least 80% of the anticipated duration of treatment.
Histologic Response to Antiviral Therapy
A favorable effect of antiviral therapy on hepatic histology, including fibrosis, has been demonstrated in most studies of IFN monotherapy,43, 45, 46, 157 and improvement in histologic necroinflammatory activity was not confined to biochemical and virologic responders.116 This observation suggests that IFN therapy may have a beneficial effect on liver histology even in the absence of an SVR. Similarly, in clinical trials of IFN/ribavirin combination therapy, histologic improvement was documented; in compiled data from 1509 patients included in 3 RCTs, the progression of fibrosis was reduced significantly among IFN/ribavirin-treated patients.44 SVR, duration of treatment, and baseline fibrosis stage were all predictors of fibrosis reduction in a proportional hazards regression analysis. In a combined database of RCTs of PEG-IFN alfa-2b with or without ribavirin, Poynard et al158 also found that antiviral therapy was associated with a reversal of cirrhosis. In a recent meta-analysis of 3 RCTs of PEG-IFN alfa-2a versus standard IFN alfa-2a involving 1013 patients with and without cirrhosis,142, 143, 146 Cammà et al47 found that PEG-IFN alfa-2a reduced fibrosis significantly more effectively than IFN alfa-2a and that the improvement in fibrosis was confined to patients with an SVR. In reports by Shiffman et al,159, 160 even nonresponders with reductions in HCV RNA levels demonstrated improvements in necroinflammatory activity and/or fibrosis, while in other analyses, histologic improvement did not correlate with improvements in HCV RNA levels.44
Similarly, in a systematic review of the histologic response to IFN/ribavirin combination therapy compared with IFN monotherapy, Kjaergard et al130 for the Cochrane Collaboration found that combination therapy significantly increased the likelihood of histologic response, expressed as a reduction in the necroinflammatory component of the histologic activity index (HAI) in prior treatment-naive patients (relative risk, 0.83; CI, 0.74–0.93; reported in 5 trials). IFN/ribavirin combination therapy, however, provided no significant benefit compared with IFN monotherapy on the fibrosis score in prior treatment-naive patients (relative risk, 0.93; CI, 0.86–1.02; reported in 4 trials) or in relapsers and nonresponders (relative risk, 0.85; CI, 0.66–1.08; reported in 1 trial).
Such analyses of histologic outcomes in studies of antiviral therapy have been hampered somewhat, but not invalidated, by reduced posttreatment biopsy compliance, consistent among trials. In the most recent pivotal trials of antiviral therapy, rates of biopsies at the end of follow-up ranged from 58%145 to 67%144 to 68%40, 127, 143 to 73%.126 (The 2 trials of PEG-IFN alfa-2a plus ribavirin41, 42 did not include assessments of the histologic response to therapy.) Although the low frequency of second biopsies detracts somewhat from confidence in conclusions about histologic outcome of antiviral therapy, in these pivotal trials, for those patients with paired biopsy specimens, Knodell HAI scores161 improved relatively consistently, necroinflammatory HAI scores in 48%–69% and fibrosis HAI scores in 14%–21% (Table 6).
Table 6. Histologic Outcome in Large RCTs of Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C
| Regimen | % with improved inflammation (mean change from baseline in HAI) | % with improved fibrosis (mean change from baseline in HAI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | SVR | No SVR | All patients | SVR | No SVR | |
| PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.5 μg/kg + ribavirin40 | 68 | 90 | 38 | 21 | 26 | 14 |
| IFN alfa-2b/ribavirin40 | 69 | 91 | 44 | 20 | 21 | 19 |
| PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.5 μg/kg145 | 48 | 77 | 36 | 15 | 21 | 12 |
| IFN alfa-2b ribavirin for 24 wk126 | 57 | 88 | 41 | 16 | 24 | 12 |
| IFN alfa-2b/ribavirin for 48 wk126 | 61 | 86 | 39 | 14 | 16 | 12 |
| IFN alfa-2b/ribavirin for 24 wk127 | 52 | 22 | ||||
| IFN alfa-2b/ribavirin for 48 wk127 | 63 | 19 | ||||
Effect of Antiviral Therapy on Clinical Outcomes
For the most part, clinical trials of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C have been confined to observations during finite, ≤1-year courses of therapy and 6-month posttreatment observation periods.40, 41, 42, 112, 113, 115, 116, 126, 127 In addition, except for the earliest of trials in the late 1980s,112, 113, 162 the primary end point in most trials has been SVR, a virologic rather than clinical end point. Because of the limited duration of follow-up in these trials, and because the natural history of chronic hepatitis C evolves relatively slowly over many years and even decades in most patients, studies of antiviral therapy have not been designed to address the potential benefits of antiviral therapy on clinical outcomes such as mortality or morbidity. In the systematic review by Kjaergard et al for the Cochrane Collaboration,130 no significant difference could be detected in liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality after treatment with IFN/ribavirin combination therapy versus IFN monotherapy. These investigators focused their review on trials of standard IFN therapy and did not include experience with the current standard of care of PEG-IFN and ribavirin. Certainly, trials of antiviral therapy have shown an improvement in quality of life, a measure of improved morbidity, after successful IFN therapy.163, 164, 165 Moreover, Yoshida et al50 and Kasahara et al166 have reported prolonged survival and a reduction in complications of liver disease after successful IFN therapy. Based on literature-derived projections of the natural history of chronic hepatitis C and the demonstrated efficacy of antiviral therapy in clinical trials, several groups have performed decision analyses demonstrating that antiviral therapy is cost-effective, not only for patients typically included in clinical trials but also for patients with milder chronic hepatitis C.21, 107, 167, 168, 169 In these analyses, when the cost of therapy is weighed against the expected clinical outcomes of chronic hepatitis C, treatment can be calculated to reduce direct medical care costs, a model that supports the value of antiviral therapy in reducing the ultimate clinical complications of chronic hepatitis C.
Quite controversial is the potential effect of antiviral therapy on the occurrence of HCC. More than a dozen reports, as reviewed by El-Serag,37 have appeared in the literature purporting to show a reduction in the incidence over time of HCC in IFN-treated versus untreated or in IFN-responsive versus IFN-nonresponsive subjects.48, 49, 81, 170, 171 Only one of these reports was described as being a prospective RCT49; however, in this trial, the extraordinarily high (38%) frequency of HCC in the untreated control group and the reduction in HCC even in IFN nonresponders generated reservations about the conclusions of the study. The rest of these studies were either not randomized or retrospective and therefore were potentially influenced by lead-time bias favoring treatment of patients with earlier-stage disease. Thus, the observed reduction in HCC among treated patients may have reflected the inclusion in treated groups of patients with earlier-stage disease in whom the risk of HCC was lower, rather than reflecting the benefits of treatment.37, 172, 173 In contrast, several retrospective and prospective trials failed to detect any reduction in HCC among cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with IFN.35, 174, 175 Currently under way are at least 3 prospective, randomized trials of maintenance PEG-IFN therapy among patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis designed to determine the impact of such protracted treatment in the subset of patients at increased imminent risk of decompensation and HCC.176
Side Effects of Therapy
Side effects during therapy for chronic hepatitis C with IFN or PEG-IFN include the following: (1) flu-like systemic symptoms; (2) marrow suppression (primarily leukopenia and thrombocytopenia); (3) emotional effects such as irritability, difficulty concentrating, disturbed memory, and depression; and (4) autoimmune reactions, the most common of which is autoimmune thyroiditis.40, 41, 42, 112, 126, 142, 143, 145, 177, 178, 179 Neutropenia is more likely in patients receiving PEG-IFN than in those receiving standard IFN; in combination IFN/ribavirin trials, dose reductions associated with neutropenia were more likely in PEG-IFN recipients (18%–20%) than in standard IFN recipients (5%–8%).40, 41, 177 Although neutropenia is common in IFN recipients, the risk of infection remains low, even for patients with absolute neutrophil counts <500/mm3 179, 180; therefore, although careful monitoring and clinical vigilance is indicated for severe neutropenia, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy is required very rarely. In addition to these 4 broad categories of adverse events, treated patients may experience hair thinning and loss, insomnia, visual disorders (including, rarely, retinal hemorrhages, which are more likely in patients with preexisting vascular disorders such as diabetes and hypertension), fatigue, weight loss, hearing impairment, interstitial pneumonitis, pancreatitis, colitis, and exacerbation of inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis.177 Flu-like symptoms respond to acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sleep-promoting agents are used for insomnia, and antidepressants can be used to counter symptoms of depression.177
Ribavirin contributes additional side effects, the most important of which is hemolytic anemia.181 A meta-analysis of data from 17 studies revealed an overall increased risk (ribavirin versus no ribavirin) for anemia of 9% (CI, 4%–13%),182 which was higher in 2 Asian studies with risk differences of 29% and 22% than the pooled risk difference of 7% (CI, 3%–12%) for the 15 non-Asian studies in the meta-analysis. Not surprisingly, the risk associated with ≥1000 mg of ribavirin daily was higher (risk difference, 9%; CI, 4%–14%) than that for 800 mg of ribavirin daily (risk difference, 1%; CI, 4%–6%).
In a systematic review, IFN/ribavirin combination therapy was found to increase the risk not only of anemia but also of other adverse events over those observed in recipients of IFN monotherapy.130 In the combination therapy versus monotherapy group, the relative risk of anemia was 16.67 (CI, 5.68–48.89; reported in 17 trials), of cough was 1.66 (CI, 1.19–2.31; reported in 3 trials), of dyspepsia was 1.72 (CI, 1.17–2.54; reported in 4 trials), of dyspnea was 2.03 (CI, 1.49–2.77; reported in 2 trials), of leukopenia was 4.52 (CI, 1.55–13.23; reported in 1 trial), of pharyngitis was 1.55 (CI, 1.14–2.12; reported in 2 trials), of pruritus was 2.32 (CI, 1.75–3.08; reported in 9 trials), and of rash was 2.37 (CI, 1.58–3.56; reported in 7 trials). Sinusitis is also associated with ribavirin. Dose reductions were more likely in the combination therapy group (relative risk, 2.44; CI, 1.58–3.75; reported in 19 trials), as was treatment discontinuation (relative risk, 1.28; CI, 1.07–1.52; reported in 25 trials). Precipitation of gout has also been observed in ribavirin-treated patients, and, because the drug is renally excreted, ribavirin should be avoided in patients with renal insufficiency. Similarly, because ribavirin is teratogenic in animals, the drug is contraindicated in pregnancy, necessitating strict precautions and rigorous contraceptive practices in women of childbearing potential and their male sexual partners. In registration trials of PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy, side effects and laboratory abnormalities led to dose reductions in 36%–45% and to drug discontinuation in 5%–16%.40, 41, 42
Complicated as it is by anemia, ribavirin should be avoided in patients with severe anemia and in populations who cannot tolerate the onset of anemia, such as those with ischemic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. If symptomatic anemia occurs during ribavirin therapy, the dose of ribavirin can be reduced or erythropoietin can be added. Preliminary studies suggest that erythropoietin injection therapy improves some of the symptoms of anemia, improves quality-of-life and fatigue scores, and allows the maintenance of higher doses of ribavirin183, 184, 185; however, to date, an increase in EVR or SVR rates has not been evaluated or demonstrated. Currently under investigation are second-generation ribavirins such as the ribavirin prodrug viramidine, which is “targeted” to the liver by the requirement for hepatic metabolism to the active ribavirin metabolite186, 187; in preliminary trials, viramidine plus PEG-IFN has been associated with less frequent and less severe anemia.188 If confirmatory trials demonstrate a similar efficacy and safety of viramidine, the need for ribavirin dose reductions and/or red blood cell growth factors will likely be minimized.
Although severe depression and suicide attempts are rare among treated patients, these psychiatric side effects merit special concern. In the large randomized trials of standard IFN plus ribavirin, PEG-IFN monotherapy, and PEG-IFN plus ribavirin, depression was the most likely cause for premature discontinuation of therapy126 and the most severe psychiatric side effect142; deaths resulting from suicide occurred in 1 patient in an IFN/ribavirin re-treatment trial of nonresponders178 and in 1 patient in 1 of the 3 trials of PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy.42
In the study of PEG-IFN monotherapy in patients with cirrhosis (or advanced fibrosis) by Heathcote et al,143 2 liver failure deaths and 1 HCC-associated death occurred half a year to more than 1 year after therapy, and 1 death resulting from a cerebral hemorrhage after a suspected methadone overdose occurred 24 days after the completion of treatment. Generally, patients with compensated cirrhosis tolerate antiviral therapy well, but extra vigilance is required in this subpopulation.26, 101, 143, 189, 190 For patients with decompensated cirrhosis, IFN-based antiviral therapy has been linked to life-threatening adverse events189, 191 and is not recommended routinely.26, 190 Instead, such patients should be referred for assessment as candidates for liver transplantation. In selected liver transplantation centers, prospective trials of “gingerly” administering low-dose, progressively escalated IFN are in progress in an attempt to reduce the HCV burden before transplantation and to minimize the risk of posttransplantation reinfection.192, 193, 194, 195, 196
Management of side effects is especially critical to improve adherence to therapy.148 Patients are more likely to complete therapy when substantial support is provided by the clinical team, and support personnel lend substantially to this effort.26, 177
Treatment Recommendations
For previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C, circulating HCV RNA, elevated aminotransferase levels, evidence on liver biopsy of moderate to severe hepatitis grade and stage (METAVIR stage ≥F2, Ishak stage ≥3, septal or bridging fibrosis), and compensated liver disease, PEG-IFN and ribavirin are recommended.26, 69 A combination of weight-based PEG-IFN alfa-2b (1.5 μg/kg) or fixed-dose PEG-IFN alfa-2a (180 μg) by subcutaneous injection once a week plus daily oral ribavirin is the treatment of choice. The results of a single, large RCT42 support a recommendation that patients with more treatment-refractory genotype 1 require 48 weeks of therapy with higher daily doses of ribavirin (in divided doses administered twice daily; 1000–1200 mg, depending on weight <75 kg or ≥75 kg), while patients with the more treatment-favorable genotypes 2 and 3 can be treated for only 24 weeks and with only 800 mg daily of ribavirin (in divided doses administered twice daily). Moreover, 12 weeks of therapy suffices in patients with genotypes 2 and 3 in whom HCV RNA levels are undetectable at week 4.150 In the group of patients with genotypes 2 and 3, patients with genotype 2 are more likely than those with genotype 3 to achieve an SVR149; for patients with genotype 3 who have high levels of HCV RNA or advanced fibrosis on liver biopsy, many authorities recommend treatment for 48 weeks. For patients with genotype 4, 48 weeks of PEG-IFN plus full-dose ribavirin (1000–1200 mg) is recommended. (Based on data in the registration trial of PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin,40 a ribavirin dose of only 800 mg/day was approved for routine use of this combination regimen, regardless of genotype; however, the consensus of most authorities is that the higher, weight-based dose of ribavirin should be used in patients with genotype 1.26, 69, 197)
Recommendation category: I
For patients with milder histologic changes (METAVIR stage F1, Ishak stage <3) (and normal serum aminotransferase activity; see following text), the risk of disease progression is lower.32, 61, 91 Although trials designed to demonstrate the efficacy of contemporary combination antiviral therapy were not powered to address patients with mild histology specifically, such patients appear to respond as well as, or even better than, patients with more advanced histologic changes.92 Therefore, decisions about this subgroup of patients can be individualized; such patients can be counseled about the low risk of progression but still can be offered therapy (see following text). If a decision is made to defer therapy in patients with mild disease, periodic laboratory and histologic monitoring should be pursued.26 Some authorities have suggested repeat liver biopsies at 3-year intervals26; however, data to support a recommendation on the frequency of histologic monitoring are wanting. Current contraindications to therapy include decompensated cirrhosis, pregnancy, uncontrolled depression or severe mental illness, active substance abuse in the absence of concurrent participation in a drug treatment program, advanced cardiac or pulmonary disease, severe cytopenias, poorly controlled diabetes, retinopathy, seizure disorders, immunosuppressive treatment, autoimmune diseases, or other inadequately controlled comorbid conditions.24, 26, 198 Although these contraindications excluded a large proportion of potential candidates in the clinical trials that validated antiviral therapy,198 efficacy and tolerability of antiviral therapy in clinical practice are very similar to those reported in multicenter, registration trials.199
Recommendation category: I
Before therapy, baseline quantitative HCV RNA levels should be determined, and the same quantitative assay should be repeated at 12 weeks. Failure to achieve a ≥2-log10 reduction in HCV RNA levels (EVR) predicts ultimate failure to achieve an SVR with almost 100% certainty.41, 96, 156 Therefore, and especially for persons who tolerate therapy poorly, many authorities discontinue therapy after 12 weeks for patients who have failed to achieve an EVR.26 Because histologic benefit may accrue even in the absence of an SVR,116, 159, 160 some authorities treat beyond 12 weeks even in patients who have not achieved an EVR. Testing for HCV RNA with a qualitative assay or a more sensitive quantitative assay is helpful at the completion of therapy to determine whether an end-of-treatment response has occurred and at 24 weeks after completing therapy to establish whether an SVR has occurred.26, 156 Achieving an SVR at 6 months posttreatment is likely to be maintained indefinitely in ≥98% of patients, and a 2-year SVR represents a cure in all cases.43, 45, 118, 119, 200
In the absence of contraindications, liver biopsy is recommended before therapy to assess the degree of inflammation and fibrosis.24, 26, 84, 201 Because most patients with chronic hepatitis C have had the disease for several decades before coming to medical attention, a baseline biopsy specimen provides information on the histologic toll of HCV infection in the past. In addition, histologic grade and stage are the best predictors of future progression of hepatitis C to cirrhosis32 and good predictors of response to therapy.40, 126, 127, 142, 202 Patients with moderate to severe hepatitis C are candidates for therapy, while those with mild hepatitis (METAVIR stage <2, Ishak stage <3) may progress sufficiently slowly to justify withholding or postponing therapy and reliance on monitoring alone26 (see following text). Because the response to antiviral therapy is so high in patients with genotypes 2 and 3, some authorities treat this subgroup without a baseline biopsy.84
Clinical and virologic monitoring during therapy should be conducted at intervals ranging from once a month to once every 3 months. Frequent hematologic monitoring is necessary to identify marked anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia; monitoring of thyroid-stimulating hormone levels is indicated to identify hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. Dose reductions of PEG-IFN and ribavirin are recommended for hematologic thresholds reviewed in Table 7. Clinicians treating patients with hepatitis C should monitor carefully for clinical signs of depression and intervene appropriately (eg, frequent in-person or telephone contacts for mild depression, more frequent/intense monitoring, dose reductions of 25%–50%, and/or the addition of antidepressant medications for moderate depression, and discontinuation of antiviral therapy and psychiatric consultation/therapy for severe depression).
Table 7. Recommended Thresholds for Drug Dose Reductions in Patients Treated With PEG-IFN and Ribavirin for Chronic Hepatitis C
| Hematologic threshold | Dose reductiona |
|---|---|
| Absolute neutrophil count (/mm3) | |
| Reduce PEG-IFN doseb | |
| Withhold PEG-IFN | |
| Platelet count (/mm3)c | |
| Reduce PEG-IFN dosec | |
| Withhold PEG-IFN | |
| Hemoglobin (g/100 mL) | |
| Reduce ribavirin dosed | |
| Discontinue ribavirind |
a The magnitude of dose reductions differs between the 2 PEG-IFN preparations, as noted in the following footnotes. |
b For PEG-IFN alfa-2b, reduce dose by 50%; for PEG-IFN alfa-2a, reduce dose to 135 μg. |
c The platelet thresholds cited appear in the product insert for PEG-IFN alfa-2a (dose reduction to 90 μg); in the product insert for PEG-IFN alfa-2b, the platelet threshold for dose reduction is 80,000/mm3 (dose reduction 50%) and for drug discontinuation is 50,000/mm3. |
d For PEG-IFN alfa-2b, a dose reduction of 200 mg is recommended; for PEG-IFN alfa-2a, reducing the dose to 600 mg/day is recommended. Alternatively, erythropoietin can be administered. |
Recommendation category: I
Recommendations and their rationale for other populations, most of whom were not addressed in registration trials, are reviewed in the following text.
Other Patient Populations
Patients with mild hepatitis C and/or normal ALT levelsSeveral studies have shown that patients with persistently normal ALT levels demonstrate less evidence of histologic progression than patients with elevated ALT levels, as documented by serial liver biopsy specimens, during intervals of up to 5 years.61, 88, 89, 90, 91 Therefore, some clinicians choose to monitor such patients without therapy. In fact, among patients with normal ALT levels monitored for 5 years, levels of ALT become elevated in approximately one fifth to one fourth,89 reinforcing the importance of close monitoring in this population. Similarly, as noted previously, histologic progression is much less likely in patients with histologically mild chronic hepatitis C.32 Finally, in early trials of IFN monotherapy among patients with normal ALT levels, response rates were low, and elevations of ALT levels during therapy were a cause for concern.24 Histologic stability notwithstanding, however, in patients with mild disease (low grade and stage)203 and/or normal ALT levels,92, 93, 204, 205, 206, 207 IFN/ribavirin combination therapy and PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy have been shown to achieve response rates comparable to those seen in patients with more biochemically active and histologically advanced disease, and elevations of ALT levels during combination therapy have not been observed.92, 93, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208 Similarly, decision analyses in patients with biochemically and histologically mild chronic hepatitis C have led to the conclusion that, even in this population, antiviral therapy is cost-effective.168, 169, 209 Therefore, many clinicians choose to include patients with persistently normal ALT levels and/or histologically mild chronic hepatitis C as candidates for antiviral therapy. Given the borderline indication for therapy in this group and the factors weighing for and against treatment, clinicians may rely in their decision making on individual patient features, including patient motivation and perspective, genotype, relative histologic activity and fibrosis, duration of HCV infection, age, occupation, symptoms, and so on. As therapy becomes more effective and better tolerated, the threshold for treating will be lowered; inevitably, highly effective therapy with few side effects will be offered routinely even to patients with very mild disease.
Recommendation category: I
Fibrosis/cirrhosisAlthough their likelihood of responding is lower than that identified in large-scale registration trials involving primarily noncirrhotic patients, patients with compensated cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis who can tolerate and respond to therapy are candidates for treatment.40, 126, 127, 142, 143, 189, 210 As response rates have increased overall with IFN/ribavirin combination regimens, the response rates observed in the subgroups of patients with bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis have also increased and are now approximately 40%, depending on HCV genotype.42 In patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis included in registration trials of PEG-IFN plus ribavirin, however, SVR rates for PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy (43%–44%) were no higher than response rates for standard IFN/ribavirin combination therapy (41%).40, 190 Still, and baseline cytopenias in cirrhotic patients notwithstanding, PEG-IFN plus ribavirin is a more convenient and no less effective regimen and is recommended in this subpopulation, as it is in noncirrhotic patients.
Recommendation category: I
In patients with decompensated cirrhosis (bilirubin level >1.5 mg/100 mL; prothrombin time >15 seconds [international normalized ratio, ≥1.7]; albumin level <3.4 g/100 mL; history of ascites, bleeding esophagogastric varices, or hepatic encephalopathy), antiviral therapy is not recommended191; these patients should be referred for evaluation as liver transplantation candidates.26
Recommendation category: IV
Previous relapse and nonresponder patient populationsA recent analysis of 624 patients with end-of-treatment responses to IFN-based therapy showed that 98% of all relapses occur within the first 12 weeks after cessation of therapy.211 Patients who experience a relapse (ie, in whom HCV RNA becomes undetectable during and at the end of therapy but reappears again after completion of therapy) are likely to respond and experience a relapse again with a subsequent course of the same therapy. The chance of achieving an SVR in relapsers, however, may be as high as 40%–50% if re-treatment is pursued with more effective therapy.178 If this group of patients is to be re-treated, ideally, a different, more effective regimen should be used.130, 173, 178, 210, 212, 213, 214 For example, in the largest trial reported among relapsers to standard IFN, a course of standard IFN plus ribavirin resulted in an SVR in 50% of patients.178 Similar findings have been reported in other studies.215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220 In the same vein, relapsers after a course of standard IFN monotherapy or of standard IFN/ribavirin combination therapy are candidates for PEG-IFN plus ribavirin. One supportive prospective trial demonstrated an SVR in 42% of patients who, having experienced a relapse previously after being treated with standard IFN and ribavirin, were re-treated subsequently with PEG-IFN and ribavirin for 48 weeks.221
Among prior nonresponders to standard IFN, re-treatment with standard IFN/ribavirin combination therapy yields only a small increment in SVR (≤15%), as determined in randomized trials or in meta-analyses of published trial results, regardless of which IFN preparation is used.130, 173, 204, 212, 216, 218, 219, 222, 223, 224 For nonresponders to a previous course of standard IFN, with or without ribavirin, re-treatment with PEG-IFN plus ribavirin increases the frequency of responsiveness.204 This approach has been shown in a trial involving 604 patients with advanced fibrosis to result in an end-of-treatment response in 35% but an SVR in only 18%.176, 212 The likelihood of achieving an SVR was increased (as determined by multivariable regression analysis) in previous IFN monotherapy recipients (28%), those with genotypes 2 (65%) and 3 (54%), noncirrhotic patients (23%), patients with an AST/ALT ratio ≤1 (23%), and patients with a baseline HCV RNA level <1.5 million IU/mL (27%).176 One third of those who achieved an EVR eventually achieved an SVR, while the SVR rate in the absence of an EVR was only 1%.176 Perhaps the most relevant observation in this study was the fact that, among patients who had failed in the past to respond to a course of standard IFN plus ribavirin, only 12% achieved an SVR when re-treated with PEG-IFN plus ribavirin. Among those whose dose of ribavirin during the first 20 weeks of therapy was ≥80% of the target dose, compared with those whose doses were reduced to ≤60% of the target dose, SVRs occurred in 21% and 11%, respectively.176 These factors, in addition to a patient’s tolerance to previous therapy and severity of underlying liver disease, should be taken into consideration when making individualized decisions about the re-treatment of prior nonresponder patients.
Recommendation category: I
Acute hepatitis CAcute HCV infection is usually asymptomatic and, consequently, primarily clinically inapparent.18, 52, 53 This observation and the markedly reduced annual incidence of cases of acute hepatitis C reported over the past decade17 have limited attempts to conduct clinical trials in patients with acute hepatitis C. Most of the early literature included multiple, small, uncontrolled trials of differing design, some with biochemical and others with biochemical and virologic end points, but several controlled trials have been subjected to meta-analyses. One meta-analysis included data from 4 randomized, placebo-controlled but not blinded trials115 that included an enrollment range of 25–48 patients. Patients were treated with either 3 MU of IFN alfa-2b 3 times per week for 3 months in 3 trials or 3 MU daily of IFN beta for 5 days followed by 3 MU 3 times per week for 3 weeks in the fourth trial. An SVR, as measured 12 months after stopping therapy, occurred in 41% of treated patients compared with 4% of control patients (P < .001). Another meta-analysis included these 4 trials plus 5 others (total of 9 studies, 5 randomized and 4 nonrandomized, 8 involving IFN versus no treatment and 1 involving different IFN schedules)225 identified by a MEDLINE search; however, an SVR was reported in only 5 trials. In these 5 trials, SVR was 44% more frequent in treated than in untreated groups, a marked effect in favor of treatment (P < .0001; 95% CI, +33% to +56%). In another meta-analysis that included both RCTs and nonrandomized trials, patients treated with IFN alfa and IFN beta were analyzed separately.226 Among the studies involving treatment with 3 MU of IFN alfa-2b 3 times a week for 6–24 weeks, SVR was increased by 33% in treated patients (95% CI, +8% to +58%; P < .001). The analysis of studies involving daily intravenous IFN beta for 4–7 weeks favored treatment by a gain in SVR of 83% (95% CI, 61%–100%; P < .001); however, the use of such an intensive intravenous approach to therapy and reliance on IFN beta have been confined to Japan, are not available in the United States or Europe, and can be matched in efficacy by less invasive approaches (see following text). These early meta-analyses, however, do appear to support a role for antiviral therapy during acute hepatitis C.
Others have reported the results of small trials in which short-course, high-dose (ie, daily) therapy was initiated during acute hepatitis C, but results were mixed and the efficacy of treating for limited periods (eg, until normalization of ALT levels227 or for approximately 1 month228, 229) was unconvincing. The most compelling study reported was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled German trial in which 44 patients with acute hepatitis C were treated, beginning at a mean of 89 days after infection, with 5 MU of IFN alfa-2b daily for 4 weeks and then 3 times per week for another 20 weeks, which was well tolerated; SVR assessed 6 months after completion of therapy was achieved in 43 patients (98%).230 Although no untreated control group was included in this trial, in another German study, spontaneous clearance of HCV infection occurred in 52% of patients with acute hepatitis C, predominantly in those with symptomatic acute infection.231 The excellent results of the German treatment trial,230 despite the approximately 3-month delay in initiating treatment, suggest that a period of observation to allow for potential spontaneous viral clearance before initiating antiviral therapy may not affect response rates adversely. Similarly, because the likelihood of acute HCV infection after an accidental needlestick is only approximately 3% and because antiviral therapy initiated after the onset of hepatitis C viremia is so effective, treatment to prevent HCV infection need not be initiated prophylactically after needlestick exposure.23
A recent study of antiviral therapy in patients with acute hepatitis C revisits the concept of high-dose, short-term therapy. Nomura et al232 reported the results of an RCT of short-term, early treatment versus late treatment in Japan. Thirty patients with acute hepatitis C were randomized to receive 6 MU of lymphoblastoid IFN administered intramuscularly daily for 4 weeks, beginning either 8 weeks after the onset of acute hepatitis or after 1 year of observation. In the early intervention group, 13 of 15 (87%) achieved an SVR; in the other 2 patients, who experienced a relapse after the initial 4 weeks of therapy, an additional 20 weeks of treatment (this time with 6 MU intramuscularly 3 times weekly) resulted in an SVR (total, 100% SVR). In the 1-year delayed-treatment group, an SVR was achieved in only 40% after 4 weeks of daily therapy and in an additional 2 patients only after 20 more weeks of thrice-weekly therapy (total, 53% SVR). These findings suggest that a brief course of antiviral therapy may suffice in the majority of patients with acute hepatitis C, an observation that reinforces the importance of relatively early intervention. On the other hand, daily intramuscular injections limit the appeal of this approach.
Based on available data, patients with acute hepatitis C are candidates for antiviral therapy.26, 69, 233 Because of the dramatic effect of standard IFN monotherapy in patients with acute hepatitis C, some have argued that monotherapy suffices and that ribavirin is not required.234 Preliminary data suggest that PEG-IFN monotherapy for 24 weeks results in SVR rates comparable to those observed with the intense IFN regimen used in the German trial described previously.234 In another study of 40 patients with acute hepatitis C, half received PEG-IFN monotherapy and half received PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy for 24 weeks; an SVR occurred in 80% of the monotherapy group and 85% of the combination therapy group.235 Given the enhanced efficacy of PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C, conventional doses of such combination therapy may represent a reasonable approach to treatment of patients with acute hepatitis C. In fact, the optimal regimen, dose, time to initiate therapy, duration of therapy, or benefit of adding ribavirin to IFN therapy have not been established, and the infrequency of acute hepatitis C will likely confound the prospective comparison of different treatment regimens. Based on available data, many authorities would initiate treatment within no later than 2–3 months after the onset of acute hepatitis and would extend combination therapy for at least 24 weeks.233
Recommendation category: II-2b
Injection drug useIn the past, injection drug use was considered a contraindication to antiviral therapy of hepatitis C24; however, currently, injection drug users represent one of the largest groups with chronic hepatitis C and the subpopulation most likely to be infected acutely with HCV.17, 66, 86, 198, 236 During the 2002 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Management of Hepatitis C, attention was focused on this overlooked patient group, previously excluded from most clinical trials.26, 85, 86 For active injection drug users, compliance is a concern, as are psychiatric side effects of IFN-based therapy and the risk of HCV reinfection. Similarly, for recovered injection drug users, which includes those in methadone maintenance programs, the psychiatric side effects of antiviral therapy and the availability of syringes and needles required for therapy were considered potential barriers.86, 237
Experience in treating both active and recovered injection drug users has been very limited; however, in preliminary trials, both groups have been treated, with SVR rates comparable to those achieved in non-drug users.238, 239, 240, 241 Compliance has been reduced substantially in some studies but not in others, particularly in those with recent injection drug use; psychiatric comorbidity, as anticipated, is more common than in patients without a history of injection drug use, but these patients can be treated effectively. Decisive ingredients for success in this patient population, however, are participation of health professionals experienced in addiction medicine in their treatment and linkage of antiviral therapy with ongoing drug treatment programs.26, 86, 237
These early, encouraging data indicate that injection drug users with hepatitis C can be treated successfully; therapy is recommended for recovered drug users, including those on methadone maintenance, and, based on a case-by-case review, for active drug users, especially when in conjunction with drug treatment programs.26, 86, 237 Additional randomized trials will be required to evaluate the safest and most effective treatment regimens; the levels of and factors favoring compliance; the risk of recidivism; side effect profiles, including the risk of depression; and the impact of antiviral therapy on methadone requirements.
Recommendation category: I
AlcoholismActive, excessive alcohol use, which has been shown to be associated with progressive liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C,59, 242, 243, 244, 245 had been considered a contraindication to antiviral therapy.24 Therefore, patients who were not abstinent from alcohol for at least 1–2 years were excluded from most of the large clinical trials of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Clinical trials including patients who were actively consuming alcohol are very limited but suggest that excessive alcohol use reduces the likelihood of a response to therapy.87, 246, 247, 248 During the 2002 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Management of Hepatitis C, the consensus panel concluded that continued alcohol abuse affected the response to therapy adversely, that abstinence should be recommended before and during antiviral treatment, that treatment of alcohol abuse should be linked with efforts to treat hepatitis C in alcoholic patients, that a safe level of alcohol consumption in patients with hepatitis C has not been established, and that even moderate alcohol consumption can have a deleterious effect on the progression of liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C.26, 87
Recommendation category: II-1b
Black patientsBlack patients have a higher rate of HCV infection8 and a lower response rate to antiviral therapy (and less favorable antiviral kinetics) than white patients,77, 101, 155, 245, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254 and these disparities remain to be explained. Recognition of a lower response rate among black patients emerged from retrospective analyses of data from large RCTs of IFN monotherapy (SVR of 2% in 40 patients)249 and IFN/ribavirin combination therapy (SVR of 11% in 53 patients).253 Although the latter analysis suggested that an increased prevalence of genotype 1 accounted for the low response rate among black patients,253 response rates remain lower in black patients with genotype 1 than in white patients with genotype 1,254, 255 and genotype does not explain the differences adequately. Poor response rates in black patients were confirmed in additional retrospective analyses of IFN monotherapy251, 252 and in 2 prospective trials of PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy in treatment-naive patients254, 255 as well as in a prospective trial of PEG-IFN/ribavirin re-treatment of prior IFN or IFN/ribavirin nonresponders.176 These studies suggest also that the constitutional neutropenia observed frequently in black patients is not a barrier to treatment.254 Thus, while contemporary PEG-IFN/ribavirin regimens have improved response rates among black patients, their response rates remain substantially lower than those in their white counterparts. Although expectations for success are lower, black patients should be offered antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C.26 Before therapy, treating physicians should explain the reduced response rate observed in black patients, and those who fail to respond should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials designed to improve responsiveness.
Recommendation category: I
Hematologic disordersPatients with thalassemia or other hemoglobinopathies and patients with hemophilia and other inherited coagulation disorders were at greater risk of acquiring HCV infection as a consequence of repeated transfusions of blood and clotting factors, respectively, before the introduction of blood donor screening for hepatitis C.256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261 Because of their hematologic disorders, however, they were excluded from registration trials of antiviral therapy, and their response to contemporary PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy has not been reported.
Thalassemia
For thalassemic patients with chronic hepatitis C, chronic anemia represents a potential contraindication for antiviral regimens that include ribavirin. A concern in this population is the exacerbation of chronic anemia by the dose-dependent hemolytic anemia associated with ribavirin.181, 182 Moreover, many thalassemic patients have concomitant, severe hemosiderosis and iron-related liver disease, including cirrhosis. The application of therapy for hepatitis C has been studied in only a small number of trials, and the numbers of patients studied are too low to provide meaningful conclusions. In several trials with small numbers of subjects, rates of SVR after IFN monotherapy were comparable to those achieved in nonthalassemic patients.85, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267 After IFN/ribavirin combination therapy, an SVR rate as high as 72% was reported in a group of 18 thalassemic patients, but confidence in these results is limited by the small number studied, and therapy was complicated by a substantial increase in transfusion requirements during therapy.268 Therefore, this chronically anemic, iron-overloaded subpopulation can be treated effectively, but the toll of adverse effects is higher than in those without thalassemia. For thalassemic patients with substantial hemosiderosis, primary therapy, before considerations of antiviral therapy, should be focused on reducing iron overload.
Hemophilia
Frequencies of SVR among hemophiliac patients treated with IFN monotherapy or IFN/ribavirin combination therapy have been reported in a limited number of clinical trials, each involving only small numbers of subjects. Response rates tend to be similar to or appreciably lower than those in the nonhemophiliac population; approximately 30% have been reported to respond to 1 year of combination therapy.259, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277 For example, in the largest reported RCT,259 113 patients with inherited coagulation disorders were treated with IFN alfa-2b (3 MU 3 times weekly) plus ribavirin (1000 mg/day) or IFN monotherapy. The SVR rate in the combination therapy arm was 29% compared with 7% in the monotherapy arm. Adolescents treated with the combination had a significantly higher response rate than adults (59% vs 15%; P < .001).259
In general, these patients should receive care similar to that recommended for other HCV-infected patients. Although data based on clinical trials do not exist on the use of PEG-IFN and ribavirin in hemophiliac patients, the safety and efficacy profiles are likely to be similar to those of the more general population of patients with hepatitis C. The duration of therapy should be guided by genotype, and liver biopsies can be performed safely by experienced teams working in conjunction with hematologists. Thus, until data are available, treatment options and recommendations should be adapted from the nonhemophiliac population.85, 274
Recommendation category: II-2b
ChildrenOnly a small proportion of patients infected with hepatitis C are children. Like adults, children with chronic hepatitis C are usually asymptomatic, and their biochemical profiles and histologic findings are similar to those in adults; however, rates of disease progression during childhood appear to be slower than for adults.55, 221, 278, 279 Whether the lifetime risk of progression will turn out to be lower remains to be determined, and more long-term data are awaited. For children, the general principles of management are the same as those for adults. Treatment is generally well tolerated by children, and response rates to IFN monotherapy and IFN/ribavirin combination therapy are similar to those reported in adults.26, 69, 278, 279, 280, 281 Ribavirin is also available as a pediatric liquid (40 mg/mL), and the approved dose of IFN alfa-2b for pediatric use is 3 MU/m2. The duration of therapy is determined by genotype, and therapy is not recommended for patients younger than 3 years. Trials of PEG- IFN in combination with ribavirin are in progress.
Recommendation category: I
End-stage renal diseaseThe higher prevalence of HCV infection in patients with end-stage renal disease and the increased risk of disease progression and diminished graft and patient survival following renal transplantation and immunosuppression282, 283, 284, 285 highlight the serious nature of this infection in patients with renal failure.85 Ideally, an effective therapy for hepatitis C before renal transplantation would be desirable; however, ribavirin is excreted renally (and not cleared by dialysis) and therefore is currently contraindicated in this population, and pharmacokinetic studies have shown that the clearance of IFN is lower in patients on dialysis compared with patients who have normal renal function.286
Still, studies of antiviral therapy in patients with end-stage renal disease suggest that IFN monotherapy is generally well tolerated and that SVR rates are higher than those observed in patients with normal renal function.283, 287, 288 Generally, however, the number of study subjects in these trials, individually and even collectively, was too low to support confident conclusions, side effects and serious adverse events were more common in this population, and, in some studies, the vast majority of patients discontinued therapy prematurely because of adverse events.289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295 The role of therapy in this population and the safety and utility of smaller doses of ribavirin85, 296 in combination with PEG-IFN remain unclear and are currently under investigation. Therefore, currently, the role of antiviral therapy in this population remains undefined. For individual patients, the potential benefit of therapy should be weighed against the higher risk of toxicity, and treatment should be undertaken in centers with experienced clinicians, ideally in clinical trials.
For PEG-IFN alfa-2a, a dose reduction from 180 to 135 μg is recommended by the manufacturer for patients with renal failure; for PEG-IFN alfa-2b, the manufacturer makes no specific recommendation about dose reduction for patients with renal failure, but 50% dose reductions are recommended for other clinical indications (eg, hematologic).
If an HCV-infected patient with end-stage renal disease is being considered for kidney transplantation, the degree of hepatic fibrosis should be evaluated; advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in this population are associated with reduced graft and patient survival.283
Recommendation category: II-2a
Extrahepatic diseaseAlthough the frequency of circulating immune complex activity is high in patients with chronic hepatitis C,297 symptomatic extrahepatic manifestations of chronic HCV infection occur only rarely in these patients. In patients with cutaneous vasculitis or glomerulonephritis resulting from HCV-associated essential mixed cryoglobulinemia, the response to antiviral therapy is variable and often disappointing. In a small number of trials involving small numbers of patients, improvements in cutaneous vasculitis and glomerulonephritis have been reported to occur during therapy, but SVRs were unlikely,298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303 the promising results of 1 recent study notwithstanding.304 Therefore, many such patients require indefinite maintenance of antiviral therapy.24, 305, 306, 307 In refractory cases, plasmapheresis and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy may be required. Non-Hodgkin’s B-cell lymphoma has been reported, albeit rarely, among patients with chronic hepatitis C.308 A promising report indicated that HCV-associated B-cell lymphoma responded to antiviral therapy with IFN.309
Recommendation category: IIb
HIV and HCV coinfectionApproximately one fourth to one third of all persons infected with HIV are coinfected with HCV, presumably because of shared routes of transmission.310 HCV/HIV coinfection is particularly common in injection drug users with HIV infection, in whom up to 90% may be coinfected with HCV. With the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and the improved survival that followed in HIV-infected patients, hepatitis C and its complications (acceleration of liver disease, progression of fibrosis, frequency of cirrhosis, and occurrence of end-stage liver disease, liver failure, and HCC) have become a substantial source of mortality and morbidity in persons with HIV infection.73, 74, 75, 76, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317 Because HIV infection has such a detrimental effect on the natural history of HCV infection, all HIV-infected patients should be screened for HCV infection; among those with HCV infection, evaluation of candidacy for antiviral therapy should be undertaken (including liver biopsy).310, 318 Ideally, the HIV infection should be well controlled with antiretroviral therapy before treatment of the HCV infection is initiated.
Unfortunately, patients with HIV/HCV coinfection respond less favorably to antiviral therapy than patients with HCV infection alone,310, 319 and the US Food and Drug Administration has not approved antiviral therapy for HCV infection in HIV-infected patients. Still, 4 recent clinical trials have documented the safety and efficacy of PEG-IFN and ribavirin in this patient population (Table 8).320, 321, 322, 323 In the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group trial 5071 conducted in the United States,320 133 adult patients were randomized to receive 48 weeks of combination therapy with either IFN alfa-2b 3 MU 3 times a week or PEG-IFN alfa-2a 180 μg once a week plus ribavirin 600 mg/day initially (increased if tolerated). Although PEG-IFN was superior to standard IFN, the efficacy of PEG-IFN/ribavirin therapy was well below that reported in HCV-monoinfected patients with HCV genotype 1. The frequency of SVR in the PEG-IFN/ribavirin group was only 14% for genotype 1. In contrast, for coinfected patients with genotypes 2 and 3, the frequency of SVR was 73% following a full 48 weeks of therapy, comparable to that reported in HCV-monoinfected patients (treated for only 24 weeks). Treatment was well tolerated, requiring discontinuation in only 12% of patients, and antiviral therapy for hepatitis C did not affect control of HIV replication.320
Table 8. RCTs of PEG-IFN Plus Ribavirin Versus Standard IFN Plus Ribavirin in Patients With HIV/HCV Coinfection
| Trial | ACTG 5071320 | RIBAVIC321 | APRICOT322 | Barcelona323 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration (wk) | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48/24a |
| Type of PEG-IFN | alfa-2b | alfa-2b | alfa-2a | alfa-2b |
| SVR genotypes 1–4 (%)b | 14 | 17 | 29 | 38 |
| SVR genotypes 2–3 (%)b | 73 | 44 | 62 | 53 |
| Discontinued therapy (%)c | 12 | 39 | 25 | 15 |
a Forty-eight weeks for genotypes 1–4; 24 weeks for genotypes 2–3 with HCV RNA level <800,000 IU/mL. |
b Data are presented for only the PEG-IFN/ribavirin arm, statistically superior to the standard IFN/ribavirin arm. |
c Data for both treatment arms combined (statistically indistinguishable frequency of discontinuation between the 2 arms). |
In a European study, 416 patients with HCV/HIV coinfection (approximately 40% of whom had bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis on baseline liver biopsy) were randomized to receive 48 weeks of treatment with PEG-IFN alfa-2b (1.5 μg/kg weekly) or IFN alfa-2b (3 MU 3 times a week) plus ribavirin (800 mg/day). In the PEG-IFN group, 27% achieved an SVR, compared with only 20% in the standard IFN group (P = .047). In the superior PEG-IFN group, an SVR was achieved in only 17% of patients with genotypes 1 and 4; in those with non-1 genotypes (genotypes 2, 3, and 5), an SVR occurred in 44%. Serious adverse events were reported by 35% of patients, equal in both treatment groups, and therapy was discontinued in 39% of patients, again equal in both treatment groups. In the PEG-IFN/ribavirin group, doses of PEG-IFN were reduced in 33% and doses of ribavirin reduced in 23%; for the standard IFN/ribavirin group, doses of IFN were reduced in 21% and doses of ribavirin reduced in 15%.321
In a large international trial, the AIDS Pegasys Ribavirin International Coinfection Trial,322 868 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients were randomized to receive 48 weeks of treatment with standard IFN alfa-2a (3 MU 3 times a week) plus ribavirin (800 mg/day), PEG-IFN alfa-2a (180 μg/wk) plus placebo (monotherapy), or PEG-IFN alfa-2a (180 μg/wk) plus ribavirin (800 mg/day). Again the PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination regimen proved superior, and in this trial SVR rates as high as 29% were achieved in patients with HCV genotype 1 and 62% in those with genotypes 2 or 3. Treatment was discontinued in 25% of patients despite the allowance of growth factor use in this trial.322
Finally, in a single-site, open-label RCT in 95 patients (30% with bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis) conducted in Barcelona, patients were randomized to PEG-IFN alfa-2b (100 μg/wk for weight <75 kg or 150 μg/wk for weight ≥75 kg) plus ribavirin versus standard IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin (in both arms, the dose of ribavirin was weight based; 800 mg/day for weight <60 kg, 1000 mg/day for weight between 60 and 75 kg, and 1200 mg/day for weight >75 kg). Patients with genotypes 1 and 4 were treated for 48 weeks, while patients with genotypes 2 and 3 who had HCV RNA levels <800,000 IU/mL were treated for 24 weeks. In patients with genotypes 1 and 4, an SVR was achieved in 38% of the PEG-IFN group versus 7% of the standard IFN group (P = .007); in patients with genotypes 2 and 3, an SVR was accomplished in 53% of the PEG-IFN group versus 47% of the standard IFN group (P = .73). Treatment was discontinued for adverse effects in 17% of the PEG-IFN group and 12% of the standard IFN group (P = .565); treatment doses were reduced for adverse events in 42% of the PEG-IFN group and 37% of the standard IFN group (P = .667).323
Three of these 4 trials support a recommendation of a full 48 weeks of PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy (at least 600–800 mg daily, more if tolerated) for patients with HCV/HIV coinfection, regardless of genotype. (Alternatively, some may choose to follow the recommendation of a European Consensus Conference jury, which suggested full-dose [1000–1200 mg], weight-based ribavirin therapy for coinfected patients with genotypes 1 and 4 and 800 mg for patients with genotypes 2 and 3.324) Data from these randomized trials, however, demonstrate that the most advanced treatment regimen for HCV infection (ie, PEG-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy), while safe and effective in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients, is substantially inferior in efficacy (especially in patients with HCV genotype 1) to that achieved in HCV-monoinfected patients. Thus, the majority of coinfected patients do not respond to contemporary therapy. Whether the short-term histologic benefits observed during IFN treatment, even in virologic nonresponders,320 would translate into a postulated benefit of maintenance therapy in nonresponders remains to be determined. In the absence of randomized trials linking histologic and clinical benefits to longer-term treatment in coinfected patients, a maintenance treatment strategy cannot be recommended at this time.
Although antiviral therapy for HIV and HCV can be administered together safely,325 one exception has been reported. Ribavirin, which has been shown to increase the activity and potentiate the toxicity of didanosine, should not be used in patients receiving didanosine for HIV infection.326 Because of the potential drug-drug interactions in patients on HIV treatment regimens that include didanosine, HIV treatment regimens should be altered in those starting combination therapy for HCV infection. If didanosine is critical to the HIV regimen, ribavirin should be avoided. In addition, management of chronic hepatitis C in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients can be confounded by the difficulty in distinguishing among the effects of HCV, HAART hepatotoxicity, and opportunistic infections involving the liver.327 Finally, reactivation of HCV-associated liver inflammatory activity has been reported after initiation of HAART in patients with HCV/HIV coinfection, attributed to immunologic reconstitution after HAART and restoration of cytolytic T-cell activity against HCV-infected hepatocytes.328
Recommendation category: I
Liver transplantationHepatitis C–associated end-stage liver disease represents the most frequent indication for liver transplantation.7, 329, 330, 331 Recurrent HCV infection in the new liver, as documented by detectable viremia, is universal following transplantation; however, during the early years after transplantation, clinical progression of liver disease may be limited, and, generally, early graft and host survival are unchanged.332, 333 Nevertheless, histologic progression is accelerated during the half decade following transplantation, by which time more than half of patients have moderate to severe hepatitis and 10% have advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis.332, 333 The favorable clinical outcome during the first 5 years notwithstanding, ultimately, recurrent hepatitis C results in impaired posttransplantation survival.334, 335, 336 Moreover, the frequency of early acute rejection appears to be increased in patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis C.337
Even during the early posttransplantation period, a small proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis C experience reactivation of hepatitis, often associated with difficult-to-manage rejection.338 The need for extra immunosuppressive therapy in such patients increases HCV replication and, in turn, HCV-associated liver injury.338, 339, 340 Thus, treated episodes of acute rejection (eg, with methylprednisolone pulses, polyclonal antilymphocyte globulin, or monoclonal antibodies to T cells) represent a risk factor for accelerated progression of hepatitis C after liver transplantation.341, 342 The most aggressive and fortunately the rarest form of recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation is fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, severe and relentlessly progressive liver injury characterized by fibrosis, cholestasis, and severe jaundice with only limited necroinflammatory activity.343, 344 Neither antiviral therapy (see following text) nor retransplantation has been effective in this setting.
Results of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C after liver transplantation have been disappointing, and results of clinical trials are mixed at best. Whether begun prophylactically immediately after transplantation to prevent reinfection or initiated after posttransplantation hepatitis C becomes clinically evident, antiviral therapy, even with the combination of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, may suppress HCV replication but results in an SVR in <20% of treated patients.345, 346, 347, 348, 349 Moreover, IFN, PEG-IFN, and ribavirin have not been well tolerated after liver transplantation, necessitating dose reductions for adverse events such as anemia and serious infections. An increase in acute rejection, however, as reported in renal allograft recipients treated with IFN, is recognized much less commonly but remains a risk in liver allograft recipients treated with IFN.337, 342, 345, 348, 350 Therefore, after liver transplantation, the risks and benefits of antiviral therapy should be weighed carefully for each patient, and treatment should be initiated with caution by transplantation teams experienced in the treatment of hepatitis C.342 Because immunosuppression increases HCV replication, which is associated with increased HCV-associated liver injury and may contribute to disease progression, doses of immunosuppressive drugs should be kept to a minimum in patients who undergo liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C. Although candidates for liver transplantation (ie, patients with decompensated cirrhosis) are not candidates for IFN-based antiviral therapy, attempts to eradicate hepatitis C viremia with progressively escalated, low-dose antiviral therapy before transplantation have met with early success192, 193, 194, 195, 196; additional data are awaited.
In patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis C, the development of new classes of potent, well-tolerated antiviral agents merits a high priority.
Recommendation category: I
Other Medical Therapies
An association between high levels of hepatic iron deposition and nonresponse to IFN-based antiviral therapy led to the hypothesis that iron removal by phlebotomy would enhance responsiveness to IFN; however, RCTs failed to show any benefit of phlebotomy,351, 352 which therefore has no role in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.
A variety of other medical therapies have been evaluated; however, to date, none have been shown to be effective in enhancing SVR rates. None of these therapies have been approved, and they are not recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis C.
Included among them is amantadine, which has been studied as monotherapy and in combination with IFN and with IFN and ribavirin. Although amantadine appeared to provide benefit in a few trials in naive353 and nonresponder354 patient cohorts, most RCTs showed no benefit associated with amantadine therapy.355, 356, 357, 358, 359 Therefore, amantadine cannot be recommended as a component of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C.
As discussed previously in reference to acute hepatitis C, IFN beta has properties similar to IFN alpha and therefore has been studied as therapy for HCV infection. Studies of treatment with IFN beta, however, show no advantage over treatment with IFN alfa360, 361, 362, 363; IFN beta has not been approved for treatment of hepatitis C and cannot be recommended. IFN gamma, which has potential antifibrotic effects resulting from inhibition of stellate cell activation and proliferation, has also been evaluated in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Preliminary, promising data notwithstanding,364, 365 a recent multicenter RCT (the results of which have not yet been published) failed to confirm an antifibrotic effect of IFN gamma in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Similarly, interleukin-10, evaluated in a preliminary, 3-month trial, was found to have no antiviral effect366, 367 but possibly an antifibrotic effect.367 Subsequently, a multicenter RCT of interleukin-10 versus placebo for a full year failed to show an antifibrotic effect in patients with chronic hepatitis C.368 Thymosin α-1 is an immunoregulatory peptide that influences T-cell maturation, antigen recognition, and cytokine production. The results of 2 RCTs to assess the efficacy of IFN and thymosin combination therapy369, 370 suggested a marginal enhancement of biochemical and virologic responses, but a conclusive benefit of thymosin has not been observed to date. Large-scale trials to assess combination PEG-IFN/thymosin therapy are in progress.
Recommendation category: I
Maintenance therapyAlthough contemporary antiviral therapy can result in an SVR in more than half of all treated patients, a sizable proportion of treated patients fail to achieve durable responses. Given the difficulty of clearing hepatitis C viremia, these nonresponder patients have been considered as candidates for long-term maintenance therapy. Among patients treated with IFN, histologic improvement has been recorded at the end of therapy in three fourths of patients, despite the fact that a minority experienced an SVR.116 In addition, antiviral therapy with IFN has been shown to result in reduced hepatic fibrosis.43, 44, 45, 157, 371 These observations suggest that antiviral therapy may have a beneficial impact on hepatic histology even in the absence of a virologic response. The potential benefit of maintenance therapy to achieve histologic benefit in previous IFN nonresponders was tested in 2 small, preliminary, randomized studies. In 1 study, 53 nonresponders were randomly assigned to continue IFN for 24 months or to discontinue treatment.160 In the untreated group, the fibrosis score did not decline and histologic deterioration was recorded. In contrast, in the treated group, mean fibrosis score declined from 2.5 to 1.7 (out of 4), 80% of patients had histologic improvement (P < .03), and none demonstrated histologic deterioration; histologic improvement was confined to patients in whom HCV RNA was suppressed. In another study, 57 patients with normal ALT levels and persistent HCV RNA after 1 year of IFN treatment were assigned randomly to no treatment or treatment with IFN continued for 1 year with gradual reduction of the dose to keep serum ALT activity below the upper limit of normal.372 In 6-month posttreatment biopsy specimens, the histologic grade (necrosis and inflammation) was significantly lower in the treated than in the untreated group (mean ± SD grade, 0.7 ± 0.2 vs 1.1 ± 0.3; P < .05). In the treated group, fibrosis scores decreased slightly (mean ± SD fibrosis score, 1.3 ± 0.4 decreasing to 1.1 ± 0.2); in the untreated group, fibrosis scores increased (mean ± SD fibrosis score, 1.3 ± 0.4 increasing to 1.6 ± 0.4). The results of these studies generated the hypothesis that maintenance IFN therapy in prior nonresponders might retard the progression of fibrosis or even limit the progression of cirrhosis to end-stage liver disease. Therefore, several large, multicenter RCTs of long-term (2–4 years) therapy with low-dose PEG-IFN are in progress to assess the impact of maintenance therapy on histologic and clinical end points in patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis.176, 373, 374, 375 The results of these trials will be required before recommendations can be made for long-term maintenance therapy in those who fail to achieve an SVR.
Recommendation category: I
Alternative Therapies
The basis for the major treatment recommendations outlined previously are adequately sized and powered, scientifically controlled trials. Yet, many patients with chronic hepatitis C choose to rely on so-called “alternative and complementary” medicines that have not been proven to be effective. Very few of the “natural” and herbal preparations patients take for hepatitis C have ever been subjected to clinical trials; of those that have, most of the trials fell far short of acceptable trial methodology.376, 377, 378 Even among the few herbal preparations subjected to placebo-controlled trials, none have been proven to affect HCV RNA levels or to result in an SVR.378 Alternative therapies have no role in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.
Recommendation category: I
Concluding Remarks
Chronic hepatitis C is recognized to be a potentially progressive disorder with a 20% 2-decade incidence of cirrhosis and, among cirrhotic patients, a 1%–4% annual incidence of HCC. Over the course of the past decade and a half, antiviral therapy for hepatitis C has progressed considerably. The frequency of SVRs to antiviral therapy, tantamount to a cure, has increased from <10% when the only therapy available was a 6-month course of IFN monotherapy to approximately 55% (80% in patients with HCV genotypes 2 and 3) with the contemporary standard of combination PEG-IFN plus ribavirin. Indeed, the fact that more than half of all patients with this chronic viral infection can be cured is precedent-setting; detracting somewhat from this success is the high burden of side effects and intolerability of available drugs. In addition, virologic assays have advanced in parallel with advances in antiviral therapy and, currently, standardized amplification assays, with sensitivities as low as 102 virions/mL and a broad dynamic range, can be used for monitoring early, end-of-treatment, and SVRs during and after therapy.
Successful antiviral therapy has been shown to have a beneficial effect on hepatic necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis, quality of life, mortality, and complications of liver disease. The impact of successful antiviral therapy on preventing HCC is controversial; prospective controlled trials are in progress to address this issue.
When antiviral therapy was introduced originally, clinical trials had been confined to patients with chronic hepatitis C, elevated aminotransferase levels, histologic features of moderate to severe necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis, and absence of any comorbidities or contraindications. As therapy has improved and experience has increased, several of the contraindications of the early years have become acceptable indications today. Data derived from clinical trials support the application of antiviral therapy, not necessarily universally, but certainly in selected patients with biochemically and histologically mild chronic hepatitis, acute hepatitis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, hematologic disorders, children, end-stage renal disease, extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C, HIV/HCV coinfection, and after liver transplantation. Even in patients who continue to use injection drugs and alcohol, antiviral therapy can be administered when provided in association with abstinence and drug treatment programs by health care teams experienced in addiction medicine. For prior nonresponders, application of a more advanced treatment regimen has a high success rate; for prior nonresponders, even the most advanced regimen has only a marginal impact on increasing the frequency of SVR. Several large RCTs are in progress to assess the potential value of chronic maintenance therapy in prior nonresponders with advanced fibrosis. After a frustrating period of investigative drought, early successes in the development of protease and polymerase inhibitors have raised expectations for even more effective antiviral therapies.
Dr. Dienstag serves currently on scientific advisory boards and/or data monitoring committees for Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genzyme, Gilead Sciences, Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Metabasis Therapeutics, Nucleonics, Oxxon Therapeutics, SciClone, and Vertex. Dr. McHutchison has served on scientific advisory boards, speakers bureaus, or as a consultant for Amgen, Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Centocor, GlaxoSmithKline, Idenix, InterMune Pharmaceuticals, Isis Pharmaceuticals, National Genetics Institute, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Prometheus Laboratories, Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Schering-Plough Corporation, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and XTL; he has received research support from Akros Pharma, Amgen, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Bio-Medicines, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Coley Pharmaceuticals, Fujisawa, Gilead Sciences, Human Genome Sciences, IDUN, Isis Pharmaceuticals, Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Prometheus Laboratories, Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Schering-Plough Corporation, SciClone, Triangle Pharmaceuticals, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals.
The Clinical Practice and Economics Committee acknowledges the following individuals whose critiques of this review paper provided valuable guidance to the authors: Robert L. Carithers, MD, Jason Dominitz, MD, Ira Jacobson, MD, and Teresa L. Wright, MD.
References
- . Hepatitis C virus infection . N Engl J Med . 2001;345:41–52
- . The epidemiology of viral hepatitis in the United States . Gastroenterol Clin North Am . 1994;23:437–455
- . Global surveillance and control of hepatitis C. Report of a WHO consultation organized in collaboration with the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board, Antwerp, Belgium . J Viral Hepat . 1999;6:35–47
- . Prevalence of chronic liver disease in the general population of northern Italy (the Dionysos study) . Hepatology . 1994;20:1442–1449
- . Outcome of hospital care of liver disease associated with hepatitis C in the United States . Hepatology . 2001;33:201–206
- . Liver transplantation for chronic viral hepatitis . Viral Hepat Rev . 1997;2:219–228
- . The course of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation . Hepatology . 1994;20:1137–1143
- . The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1988 through 1994 . N Engl J Med . 1999;341:556–562
- . Estimating future hepatitis C morbidity, mortality, and costs in the United States . Am J Public Health . 2000;90:1562–1569
- . The burden of hepatitis C in the United States . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S30–S34
- . Burden of liver disease in the United States (summary of a workshop) . Hepatology . 2002;36:227–242
- . Projecting future complications of chronic hepatitis C in the United States . Liver Transpl . 2003;9:331–338
- . Detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus in prospectively followed transfusion recipients with acute and chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis . N Engl J Med . 1989;321:1494–1500
- . The declining risk of post-transfusion hepatitis C virus infection . N Engl J Med . 1992;327:369–373
- . The risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infection . N Engl J Med . 1996;334:1685–1690
- . Hepatitis C virus infection in post-transfusion hepatitis (an analysis with first- and second-generation assays) . N Engl J Med . 1991;325:1325–1329
- . Epidemiology of hepatitis C in the United States . Am J Med . 1999;107:2S–9S
- . Acute hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2001;33:321–327
- . Detection of HIV-1 and HCV infections among antibody-negative blood donors by nucleic acid-amplification testing . N Engl J Med . 2004;351:760–768
- . The past incidence of hepatitis C virus infection (implications for the future burden of chronic liver disease in the United States) . Hepatology . 2000;31:777–782
- . Estimating the impact of hepatitis C virus therapy on future liver-related morbidity, mortality and costs related to chronic hepatitis C . J Hepatol . 2005;42:639–645
- . Position and policy statement (policy statement on the use of medical practice guidelines by managed care organizations and insurance carriers) . Gastroenterology . 1995;108:925–926
- . Recommendations for prevention and control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV-related chronic disease . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 1998;47:1–39
- . Management of hepatitis C . Hepatology . 1997;26(Suppl 1):1S–156S
- Consensus statement. EASL International Consensus Conference on Hepatitis C . J Hepatol . 1999;30:956–961
- . management of hepatitis C (2002—June 10–12, 2002) . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S3–S20
- . Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in adults (recommendation statement) . Ann Intern Med . 2004;140:462–464
- . Screening for hepatitis C virus infection (a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force) . Ann Intern Med . 2004;140:465–479
- . Estimating progression to cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection . Hepatology . 2001;34:809–816
- . Clinical outcomes after transfusion-associated hepatitis C . N Engl J Med . 1995;332:1463–1466
- . Prognosis of chronic hepatitis C (results of a large, prospective cohort study) . Hepatology . 1998;28:1687–1695
- . The long-term pathological evolution of chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 1996;23:1334–1340
- . Natural course of progression of fibrosis in Japanese patients with chronic liver disease type C—a study of 527 patients at one establishment . J Viral Hepat . 2000;7:268–275
- . Natural course of chronic hepatitis C . Am J Gastroenterol . 1993;88:240–243
- . Morbidity and mortality in compensated cirrhosis type C (a retrospective follow-up study of 384 patients) . Gastroenterology . 1997;112:463–472
- . Hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma . Hepatology . 1997;26(Suppl 1):34S–38S
- . Hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C in the United States . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S74–S83
- Interrelationship of blood transfusion, non-A, non-B hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma (analysis by detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus) . Hepatology . 1990;12:671–675
- . Disease progression and hepatocellular carcinogenesis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis (a prospective observation of 2215 patients) . J Hepatol . 1998;28:930–938
- . Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C (a randomised trial) . Lancet . 2001;358:958–965
- . Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection . N Engl J Med . 2002;347:975–982
- . Peginterferon-alpha2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C (a randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose) . Ann Intern Med . 2004;140:346–355
- . Long-term follow-up of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with alpha-interferon . Hepatology . 1992;15:1013–1016
- . Impact of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin on progression of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2000;32:1131–1137
- . Histologic improvement of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C who have sustained response to interferon therapy . Ann Intern Med . 2000;132:517–524
- . Modeling the impact of interferon alfa treatment on liver fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C (a dynamic view) . Gastroenterology . 1999;116:378–386
- . Effect of peginterferon alfa-2a on liver histology in chronic hepatitis C (a meta-analysis of individual patient data) . Hepatology . 2004;39:333–342
- . Interferon therapy reduces the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (national surveillance program of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan) . Ann Intern Med . 1999;131:174–181
- . Randomised trial of effects of interferon-α on incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic active hepatitis C with cirrhosis . Lancet . 1995;346:1051–1055
- . Interferon therapy prolonged life expectancy among chronic hepatitis C patients . Gastroenterology . 2002;123:483–491
- . Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness (CRD guidelines for those carrying out or commissioning reviews) . York: University of York; 1996; CRD report #4
- . Recovery, persistence, and sequelae in hepatitis C virus infection (a perspective on long-term outcome) . Semin Liver Dis . 2000;20:17–35
- . Hepatitis C (the clinical spectrum of disease) . Hepatology . 1997;26(Suppl 1):15S–20S
- . Natural history of chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S35–S46
- . Prevalence and clinical outcome of hepatitis C infection in children who underwent cardiac surgery before the implementation of blood-donor screening . N Engl J Med . 1999;341:866–870
- . Clinical outcomes after hepatitis C infection from contaminated anti-D immune globulin . N Engl J Med . 1999;340:1228–1233
- . Low frequency of cirrhosis in a hepatitis C (genotype 1b) single-source outbreak in Germany (a 20-year multicenter study) . Hepatology . 2000;32:91–96
- . Hepatitis C infection in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia after treatment with contaminated immune globulin . N Engl J Med . 1994;331:1607–1611
- . Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C . Lancet . 1997;349:825–832
- . Fibrosis and disease progression in hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S47–S56
- . Progression of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C . Gastroenterology . 2003;124:97–104
- . Progression of fibrosis in untreated patients with hepatitis C virus infection . Liver . 2002;22:136–144
- . Volunteer blood donors with antibody to hepatitis C virus (clinical, biochemical, virologic, and histologic features) . Ann Intern Med . 1995;123:330–337
- . Genes of the major histocompatibility complex class II influence the outcome of hepatitis C virus infection . Gastroenterology . 1997;113:1675–1681
- . Influence of HLA haplotypes on the clinical course of individuals infected with hepatitis C virus . Hepatology . 1998;27:240–244
- . The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection (host, viral, and environmental factors) . JAMA . 2000;284:450–456
- . Steatosis accelerates the progression of liver damage of chronic hepatitis C patients and correlates with specific HCV genotype and visceral obesity . Hepatology . 2001;33:1358–1364
- . Fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C correlates significantly with body mass index and steatosis . Hepatology . 1999;29:1215–1219
- . Management of hepatitis C . J Hepatol . 2003;38(Suppl 1):S104–S118
- . Rates and risk factors for liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus infected patients . J Hepatol . 2001;34:730–739
- . Impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on the progression of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus infected patients . Gut . 2003;52:1035–1040
- . Hepatitis C virus and liver steatosis (when fat is not beautiful) . J Hepatol . 2004;40:533–535
- . Rapidly progressive non-A, non-B hepatitis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection . Gastroenterology . 1989;97:1559–1561
- . Liver fibrosis progression in human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus coinfected patients . Hepatology . 1999;30:1054–1058
- . Influence of human immunodeficiency virus infection on the course of hepatitis C virus infection (a meta-analysis) . Clin Infect Dis . 2001;33:562–569
- . Human immunodeficiency virus infection modifies the natural history of parenterally-acquired hepatitis C with an unusually rapid progression to cirrhosis . J Hepatol . 1997;26:1–5
- . Hepatitis C in African-Americans (summary of a workshop) . Gastroenterology . 2000;119:1385–1396
- . Racial differences in liver inflammation and fibrosis related to chronic hepatitis C . Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2004;2:463–468
- . A comparison of the spectrum of chronic hepatitis C virus between Caucasians and African Americans . Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2004;2:469–473
- . Natural history of compensated viral cirrhosis (a prospective study on the incidence and hierarchy of major complications) . Gut . 2004;53:744–749
- . Determinants of outcome of compensated hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis . Hepatology . 1998;27:1435–1440
- . Hepatitis C virus genotypes and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis (a prospective study) . Hepatology . 1997;25:754–758
- . Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States . N Engl J Med . 1999;340:745–750
- . The role of liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S152–S160
- . Understudied populations with hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S226–S236
- . Prevention and treatment of hepatitis C in injection drug users . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S210–S219
- . Alcohol use and hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S220–S225
- . Slow progression rate of fibrosis in hepatitis C virus patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase activity . Hepatology . 1998;27:868–872
- . Natural history of hepatitis C virus carriers with persistently normal aminotransferase levels . Gastroenterology . 2000;118:760–764
- . Prospective study on anti-hepatitis C virus-positive patients with persistently normal serum alanine transaminase with or without detectable serum hepatitis C virus RNA . Hepatology . 2001;34:1000–1005
- . Histologic progression during short-term follow-up of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection . J Viral Hepat . 1999;6:445–452
- . Treatment of patients with hepatitis C and normal serum aminotransferase levels . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S179–S184
- . Chronic hepatitis C with normal aminotransferase levels . Gastroenterology . 2004;126:1409–1415
- . Use and interpretation of virological tests for hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S65–S73
- . Molecular diagnosis of viral hepatitis . Gastroenterology . 2003;122:1554–1568
- . Early virologic response to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2003;38:645–652
- . Genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis C virus (quasispecies and genotypes) . Semin Liver Dis . 1995;15:41–63
- . A proposed system for the nomenclature of hepatitis C viral genotypes . Hepatology . 1994;19:1321–1324
- . Variability of hepatitis C virus . Hepatology . 1995;21:570–583
- . Course and outcome of hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S21–S29
- . Heterogeneous virologic response rates to interferon-based therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (who responds less well?) . Ann Intern Med . 2004;140:346–355
- . Combination treatment of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in comparison to interferon monotherapy in treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 patients . Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol . 1999;31:472–475
- . Improved response to ribavirin interferon combination compared with interferon alone in patients with type 4 chronic hepatitis C without cirrhosis . Liver . 2000;20:335–339
- . Histologic grading and staging of chronic hepatitis . J Hepatol . 1995;22:696–699
- . An algorithm for grading activity in chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 1994;24:289–293
- . Fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C (detection and significance) . Semin Liver Dis . 2000;20:47–55
- . Watchful waiting with periodic liver biopsy versus immediate empirical therapy for histologically mild chronic hepatitis C. A cost-effectiveness analysis . Ann Intern Med . 2000;133:665–675
- . Practices of liver biopsy in France (results of a prospective nationwide survey) . Hepatology . 2000;32:477–481
- . High body mass index is an independent risk factor for nonresponse to antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2003;38:639–644
- . The impact of steatosis on disease progression and early and sustained treatment response in chronic hepatitis C patients . J Hepatol . 2004;40:484–490
- . Steatosis accelerates fibrosis development over time in hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infected patients . J Hepatol . 2002;37:837–842
- . Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with recombinant interferon alfa (a multicenter randomized, controlled trial) . N Engl J Med . 1989;321:1501–1506
- . Recombinant interferon alfa therapy for chronic hepatitis C (a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial) . N Engl J Med . 1989;321:1506–1510
- . Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with a-interferon (an analysis of the literature) . Hepatogastroenterology . 1996;43:1544–1556
- . Meta-analysis of interferon randomized trials in the treatment of viral hepatitis C (effects of dose and duration) . Hepatology . 1996;24:778–789
- . Therapy of hepatitis C (meta-analysis of interferon alfa-2b trials) . Hepatology . 1997;26(Suppl 1):83S–88S
- . Ribavirin enhances the efficacy but not the adverse effects of interferon in chronic hepatitis C. Meta-analysis of individual patient data from European centers . J Hepatol . 1997;26:961–966
- . Long-term histologic improvement and loss of detectable intrahepatic HCV RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C and sustained response to interferon alpha therapy . Ann Intern Med . 1997;127:875–881
- . 10-year follow-up after interferon-alpha therapy for chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 1998;28:1121–1127
- . Ribavirin treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C (results of a placebo-controlled study) . J Hepatol . 1996;25:591–598
- . Ribavirin as therapy for chronic hepatitis C (a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial) . Ann Intern Med . 1995;123:897–903
- . Tolerance and efficacy of oral ribavirin treatment of chronic hepatitis C (a multicenter trial) . Hepatology . 1997;26:473–477
- . Combined treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in patients with a previous non-response or non-sustained response to interferon alone . J Med Virol . 1995;46:43–47
- . Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of interferon α-2b with and without ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C . Lancet . 1998;351:83–87
- . Long-term efficacy of ribavirin plus interferon alfa in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C . Gastroenterology . 1996;111:1307–1312
- . Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C . N Engl J Med . 1998;339:1485–1492
- . Randomized trial of interferon α2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks or for 24 weeks versus interferon α2b plus placebo for 48 weeks for treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus . Lancet . 1998;352:1426–1432
- . Evaluation of long-term efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C (an Italian multicenter experience) . J Hepatol . 2000;33:448–455
- . Combination of ribavirin and interferon-alfa surpasses high doses of interferon-alfa alone in patients with genotype-1b-related chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2000;31:1338–1344
- . Interferon alfa with or without ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C (systematic review of randomised trials) . BMJ . 2001;323:1151–1155
- . Hepatitis C virus-specific T-cell reactivity during interferon and ribavirin treatment in chronic hepatitis C . Gastroenterology . 2000;118:346–355
- . Ribavirin enhancement of hepatitis C virus core antigen-specific type 1 T helper cell response correlates with the increased IL-12 levels . J Hepatol . 2000;33:791–798
- . Therapy of hepatitis C (alpha interferon and ribavirin) . Hepatology . 1997;26(Suppl 1):108S–111S
- . Ribavirin inhibits viral-induced macrophage production of tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-1, and procoagulant fg12 prothrombinase and preserves Th1 cytokine production but inhibits Th2 cytokine response . J Immunol . 1998;160:3487–3493
- . The role of ribavirin-induced mutagenesis in HCV therapy (a concept or a fact?) . Hepatology . 2003;38:807–810
- . Mechanism of action of ribavirin in the combination treatment of chronic HCV infection . Hepatology . 2002;35:1002–1009
- . RNA virus error catastrophe (direct molecular test by using ribavirin) . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2001;98:6895–6900
- . The broad-spectrum antiviral ribonucleoside ribavirin is an RNA virus mutagen . Nat Med . 2000;6:1375–1379
- . Viral RNA mutations are region specific and increased by ribavirin in a full-length hepatitis C virus replication system . J Virol . 2002;76:8505–8517
- . Antiviral action of ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C . Gastroenterology . 2004;126:703–714
- . Modelling how ribavirin improves interferon response rates in hepatitis C virus infection . Nature . 2004;432:922–924
- . Peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C . N Engl J Med . 2000;343:1666–1672
- . Peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis . N Engl J Med . 2000;343:1673–1680
- . Efficacy and safety of pegylated (40-kd) interferon alpha-2a compared with interferon alpha-2a in noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2001;33:433–438
- . A randomized, double-blind trial comparing pegylated interferon alfa-2b to interferon alfa-2b as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2001;34:395–403
- . Efficacy and safety of two-dose regimens of peginterferon alpha-2a compared with interferon alpha-2a in chronic hepatitis C (a multicenter, randomized controlled trial) . Am J Gastroenterol . 2004;99:1298–1305
- FDA advisory documents for PEG-IFN alfa-2b and PEG-IFN alfa-2a . 2005; Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/transcripts/3819t1.htm and http://www.fda.gov/chrms/dockets/ac/02/transcripts/3909t1.htm. Accessed August 16, 2005.
- . Adherence to combination therapy enhances sustained response in genotype-1-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C . Gastroenterology . 2002;123:1061–1069
- . Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in previously untreated patients infected with HCV genotypes 2 or 3 . J Hepatol . 2004;40:993–999
- . Peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for 12 vs. 24 weeks in HCV genotype 2 or 3 . N Engl J Med . 2005;352:2609–2617
- . Hepatitis C viral dynamics in vivo and the antiviral efficacy of interferon-α therapy . Science . 1998;282:103–107
- . Hepatitis C virus dynamics in vivo (effect of ribavirin and interferon alfa on viral turnover) . Hepatology . 1998;28:245–252
- . Viral kinetics in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with standard or peginterferon alfa-2a . Gastroenterology . 2001;120:1438–1447
- . Viral kinetics in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C patients during therapy with 2 different doses of peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin . Hepatology . 2002;35:930–936
- . Viral dynamics and response differences in HCV-infected African American and white patients treated with IFN and ribavirin . Hepatology . 2003;37:1343–1350
- . Monitoring of viral levels during therapy of hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S145–S151
- . The effect of interferon on the liver in chronic hepatitis C (a quantitative evaluation of histology by meta-analysis) . J Hepatol . 1997;26:1187–1199
- . Impact of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin on liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C . Gastroenterology . 2002;122:1303–1313
- . Relationship between biochemical, virological, and histological response during interferon treatment of chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 1997;26:780–785
- . A randomized, controlled trial of maintenance interferon therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus and persistent viremia . Gastroenterology . 1999;117:1164–1172
- . Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis . Hepatology . 1981;1:431–435
- . Randomized, controlled trial of recombinant human α-interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis B . Gastroenterology . 1988;95:1318–1325
- . The effects of interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin on health related quality of life and work productivity . Hepatology . 2001;34:140–147
- . Assessing health-related quality of life in chronic hepatitis C using the sickness impact profile . Clin Ther . 1994;16:334–343
- . Reduction of health-related quality of life in chronic hepatitis C and improvement with interferon therapy . Hepatology . 1999;29:264–270
- . Interferon treatment improves survival in chronic hepatitis C patients showing biochemical as well as virological responses by preventing liver-related death . J Viral Hepat . 2004;11:148–156
- . Cost effectiveness of interferon alpha2b combined with ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 1999;30:1318–1324
- . Cost-effectiveness of treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection in an evolving patient population . JAMA . 2003;290:228–237
- . Estimates of the cost-effectiveness of a single course of interferon-alpha 2b in patients with histologically mild chronic hepatitis C . Ann Intern Med . 1997;127:855–865
- . Alpha interferon treatment may prevent hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-related liver cirrhosis . J Hepatol . 1996;24:141–147
- . Effect of interferon therapy on hepatocellular carcinogenesis in patients with chronic hepatitis C (a long-term observational study of 1,643 patients using statistical bias correction with proportional hazard analysis) . Hepatology . 1999;29:1124–1130
- . Interferon and prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in viral cirrhosis (an evidence-based approach) . J Hepatol . 2001;34:593–602
- . Treatment of chronic hepatitis C (a systematic review) . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S135–S144
- . Long-term clinical outcome after beta-interferon therapy in cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C . Hepatogastroenterology . 1999;46:3216–3222
- . Effectiveness of interferon alfa on incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensation in cirrhosis type C . J Hepatol . 1997;27:201–205
- . Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C who have failed prior treatment . Gastroenterology . 2004;126:1015–1023
- . Side effects of therapy of hepatitis C and their management . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S237–S244
- . Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of relapse of chronic hepatitis C . N Engl J Med . 1998;339:1493–1499
- . Side effects of therapy for chronic hepatitis C . Gastroenterology . 2003;124:1711–1719
- . Neutropenia during combination therapy of interferon alfa and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36:1273–1279
- . Hemolytic anemia induced by ribavirin therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection (role of membrane oxidative damage) . Hepatology . 2000;31:997–1004
- . Meta-analysis (ribavirin-induced haemolytic anaemia in patients with chronic hepatitis C) . Aliment Pharmacol Ther . 2002;16:1623–1632
- . Once weekly epoetin alfa improves anemia and facilitates maintenance of ribavirin dosing in hepatitis C virus-infected patients receiving ribavirin plus interferon α . Am J Gastroenterol . 2003;98:2491–2499
- . Hematologic disorders associated with hepatitis C virus infection and their management . Clin Infect Dis . 2003;37:533–541
- . Epoetin alfa maintains ribavirin dose in HCV-infected patients (a prospective, double-blind, randomiized controlled study) . Gastroenterology . 2004;126:1302–1311
- . Activation and deactivation of a broad-spectrum antiviral drug by a single enzyme (adenosine deaminase catalyzes two consecutive deamination reactions) . Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2003;47:426–431
- . Prospects for hepatitis C virus therapeutics (levovorin and viramidine as improved derivatives of ribavirin) . Curr Opin Invest Drugs . 2002;3:680–683
- . Safety and efficacy of viramidine in combination with pegylated interferon alfa-2a for treatment of hepatitis C in therapy-naïve patients . (abstr) J Hepatol . 2004;40(Suppl 1):141–142
- . Controversies in the management of hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis . Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2004;2:183–197
- . Treatment of patients with hepatitis C and cirrhosis . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S185–S194
- . A pilot study of the tolerability and efficacy of antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus-infected patients awaiting liver transplantation . Liver Transpl . 2002;8:350–355
- . Long-term outcome of patients with chronic hepatitis C and decompensated liver disease treated with the LADR protocol (low-accelerating-dose regimen) . (abstr) Hepatology . 2002;36:297A
- . Treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus on the waiting list . Liver Transpl . 2003;9:S90–S94
- . Infection with chronic hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation (a role for interferon therapy before transplantation) . Liver Transpl . 2003;9:905–915
- . Antiviral therapy of patients with decompensated cirrhosis to prevent recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation . J Hepatol . 2003;39:389–396
- . Treatment of advanced hepatitis C with a low accelerating dosage regimen of antiviral therapy . Hepatology . 2005;42:255–262
- . Optimal therapy of hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S121–S127
- . Surprisingly small effect of antiviral treatment in patients with hepatitis C . Ann Intern Med . 2002;136:288–292
- . Effectiveness of interferon α-2b and ribavirin combination therapy in the treatment of naive chronic hepatitis C patients in clinical practice . Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2004;2:425–431
- . Durability of sustained virologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis C after treatment with interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin . (abstr) Hepatology . 2001;34:244A
- . The role of liver biopsy in hepatitis C . Hepatology . 1997;26(Suppl 1):57S–61S
- . Clinical predictors of response to recombinant alpha interferon-α treatment in patients with chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis (hepatitis C) . J Viral Hepat . 1994;1:55–63
- . High sustained response rate in patients with histologically mild (low grade and stage) chronic hepatitis C infection. A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b with and without ribavirin . Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2002;14:627–633
- . Combination of interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C (re-treatment of nonresponders to interferon) . Hepatology . 2001;33:704–707
- . The significance of baseline serum alanine aminotransferase on pretreatment disease characteristics and response to antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2000;32:400–404
- . Pilot study of interferon-alpha and ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C and normal transaminase values . J Viral Hepat . 2001;8:202–205
- . Peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kilodaltons) and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C and normal aminotransferase levels . Gastroenterology . 2004;127:1724–1732
- . Interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C and normal ALT . Am J Gastroenterol . 2004;99:1700–1705
- . Cost-effectiveness of interferon-α2b treatment for hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B . Ann Intern Med . 1995;122:664–675
- . Interferon-ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C with and without cirrhosis (analysis of individual patient data of six controlled trials) . Gastroenterology . 1999;117:408–413
- . Twelve weeks of follow-up is sufficient for the determination of sustained virologic response in patients treated with interferon alpha for chronic hepatitis C . J Hepatol . 2003;39:106–111
- . Retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S128–S134
- . Chronic hepatitis C: interferon retreatment of relapsers. A meta-analysis of individual patient data . Hepatology . 1999;30:801–807
- . Interferon for interferon nonresponding and relapsing patients with chronic hepatitis C . Cochrane Database Syst Rev . 2002; CD003617
- . A randomized 4-arm multicenter study of interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C relapsing after interferon monotherapy . Hepatology . 2002;36:959–966
- . Efficacy of high-dose interferon in combination with ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon alone . Am J Gastroenterol . 2001;96:1143–1149
- . Combined treatment of relapse of chronic hepatitis C with high-dose alpha2b interferon plus ribavirin for 6 or 12 months . J Hepatol . 2000;33:456–462
- . Retreatment for 24 vs. 48 weeks with interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin of chronic hepatitis C patients who relapsed or did not respond to interferon alone . J Viral Hepat . 2000;7:403–408
- . Interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination for patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to, or relapsed after, interferon alpha therapy (a randomized trial) . Am J Med . 1999;107:112–118
- . A randomized, controlled trial to determine whether continued ribavirin monotherapy in hepatitis C virus-infected patients who responded to interferon-ribavirin combination therapy will enhance sustained virologic response . J Infect Dis . 2001;184:405–409
- . Pegylated interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C. A trial in prior nonresponders to interferon monotherapy or combination therapy and in combination therapy relapsers: final results (abstr) . Gastroenterology . 2003;124(Suppl 1):A714
- . Interferon and ribavirin vs interferon alone in the re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C previously nonresponsive to interferon . JAMA . 2001;285:193–199
- . Interferon and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C who did not respond to previous interferon therapy (a meta-analysis of controlled and uncontrolled trials) . Hepatology . 2001;33:231–240
- . Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients who failed interferon monotherapy (effects of higher doses of interferon and ribavirin combination therapy) . Am J Gastroenterol . 2000;95:2928–2935
- . Interferon as treatment for acute hepatitis C. A meta-analysis . Dig Dis Sci . 1996;41:1248–1255
- . Interferon therapy for acute hepatitis C viral infection—a review by meta-analysis . Aust N Z J Med . 1997;27:611–617
- . High-dose interferon-alpha2b treatment prevents chronicity in acute hepatitis C (a pilot study) . Dig Dis Sci . 1996;41(Suppl):81S–85S
- . Three times weekly versus daily dose alpha-interferon treatment in patients with acute hepatitis C . Am J Gastroenterol . 2002;97:492–493
- . Natural beta interferon in acute type-C hepatitis patients (a randomized controlled trial) . Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol . 1998;30:181–184
- . Treatment of acute hepatitis C with interferon alfa-2b . N Engl J Med . 2001;345:1452–1457
- . Acute hepatitis C (high rate of both spontaneous and treatment-induced viral clearance) . Gastroenterology . 2003;125:80–88
- . Short-term inteferon-alfa therapy for acute hepatitis C (a randomized controlled trial) . Hepatology . 2004;39:1213–1219
- . Therapy of acute hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S195–S200
- . Whom? When? How? Another piece of evidence for early treatment of acute hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2004;39:1201–1203
- . Pegylated interferon α therapy in acute hepatitis C (relation to hepatitis C virus-specific T cell response kinetics) . Hepatology . 2004;39:1721–1731
- . Risk of hepatitis C virus infection among young adult injection drug users who share injection equipment . Am J Epidemiol . 2002;155:645–653
- . Is it justifiable to withhold treatment for hepatitis C from illicit-drug users? . N Engl J Med . 2001;345:211–214
- . Controlled clinical trial to assess the response of recent heroin abusers with chronic hepatitis C virus infection to treatment with interferon alpha-n2b . Clin Ther . 2002;24:1627–1635
- . Treating hepatitis C in methadone maintenance patients (an interim analysis) . Drug Alcohol Depend . 2002;67:117–123
- . Treatment of hepatitis C infection in injection drug users . Hepatology . 2001;34:188–193
- . Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in injecting drug users (5 years’ follow-up) . Eur Addict Res . 2002;8:45–49
- . Serological and histological aspects of hepatitis C virus infection in alcoholic patients . J Hepatol . 1991;13:347–350
- . Impact of alcohol on the histologica and clinical progression of hepatitis C infection . Hepatology . 1998;28:805–809
- . Clinical course and risk factors of hepatitis C virus related liver disease in the general population (report from the Dionysos study) . Gut . 1999;44:874–880
- . Host factors and failure of interferon-α treatment in hepatitis C virus . Hepatology . 2004;39:880–890
- . Interferon therapy for chronic hepatitis C in habitual drinkers (comparison with chronic hepatitis C in infrequent drinkers) . Am J Gastroenterol . 1996;91:1374–1379
- . Efficacy of interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Comparison between non-drinkers and drinkers . Scand J Gastroenterol . 1994;29:1039–1043
- . Alcohol abstinence does not offset the strong negative effect of lifetime alcohol consumption on the outcome of interferon therapy . J Viral Hepat . 2002;9:288–294
- . Racial differences in responses to therapy with interferon in chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 1999;30:787–793
- . African Americans with genotype 1 treated with interferon for chronic hepatitis C have a lower end of treatment response than Caucasians . J Viral Hepat . 2001;8:264–269
- . Impaired response to high-dose interferon treatment in African-Americans with chronic hepatitis C . Hepatogastroenterology . 2002;49:788–792
- . Intensive interferon therapy does not increase virological response rates in African Americans with chronic hepatitis C . Dig Dis Sci . 2003;48:140–145
- . The impact of interferon plus ribavirin on response to therapy in black patients with chronic hepatitis C . Gastroenterology . 2000;119:1317–1323
- . Peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in blacks and non-hispanic whites . N Engl J Med . 2004;350:2265–2271
- . Peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kd) and ribavirin for black American patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 . Hepatology . 2004;39:1702–1708
- . Non-A, non-B hepatitis. I. Recognition, epidemiology, and clinical features . Gastroenterology . 1983;85:439–462
- . Prevalence of hepatitis C virus antibody in a cohort of hemophilia patients . Blood . 1990;76:254–256
- . Heterosexual co-transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) . Ann Intern Med . 1991;115:764–768
- . Hepatitis C in adults and adolescents with hemophilia (a randomized, controlled trial of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin) . Hepatology . 2002;36:967–972
- . Antibodies against hepatitis C in a population of Swedish hemophiliacs and heterosexual partners . Scand J Infect Dis . 1990;22:393–397
- . Serologic evidence of hepatitis A and B virus infections in thalassemia patients (a retrospective study) . Transfusion . 1978;18:356–360
- . Hepatic iron overload does not prevent a sustained virological response to interferon-alpha therapy (a long term follow-up study in hepatitis C-infected patients with beta thalassemia major) . Am J Gastroenterol . 2002;97:982–987
- . Alpha interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection in thalassaemia major . Br J Haematol . 1993;83:491–497
- Effect of iron overload on the response to recombinant interferon-alfa treatment in transfusion-dependent patients with thalassemia major and chronic hepatitis C . J Pediatr . 1994;125:123–128
- . Response to interferon alfa-2b therapy in mutitransfused children with beta-thalassemia and chronic hepatitis C . Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis . 1999;18:709–715
- . Long-term efficacy of alpha-interferon in beta-thalassemics with chronic hepatitis C . Blood . 1997;90:2207–2212
- . Combination therapy with interferon alpha and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in thalassaemic patients . Br J Haematol . 1997;98:850–855
- . Interferon and ribavirin as frontline treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection in thalassaemia major . Br J Haematol . 2002;117:755–758
- . Interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection in hemophiliacs—influence of virus load, genotype, and liver pathology on response . Blood . 1996;87:1704–1709
- . A multicenter controlled, randomized, open trial of interferon alpha2b treatment of anti-human immunodeficiency virus-negative hemophilic patients with chronic hepatitis C . Blood . 1997;89:3529–3533
- . Alpha interferon therapy in Danish haemophiliac patients with chronic hepatitis C (results of a randomized controlled open label study comparing two different maintenance regimens following standard interferon-alpha-2b treatment) . Haemophilia . 1998;4:25–32
- . Interferon and ribavirin in HIV-negative haemophiliacs with chronic hepatitis C who were nonresponders to a previous interferon treatment . Haemophilia . 2002;8:794–797
- . A randomized controlled trial of recombinant interferon-alpha in chronic hepatitis C in hemophiliacs . Blood . 1991;78:1672–1677
- . Guidelines on the diagnosis, management and prevention of hepatitis in haemophilia . Haemophilia . 2001;7:339–345
- . Interferon-alpha treatment of chronic hepatitis C in children with hemophilia . J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr . 2001;32:41–44
- . Combined alpha interferon and ribavirin for the treatment of hepatitis C in patients with hereditary bleeding disorders . Br J Haematol . 2000;108:254–258
- . Treatment with interferon plus ribavirin in anti-HIV negative patients with congenital coagulation disorders and chronic hepatitis C . Thromb Haemost . 2000;83:807–810
- . Transmission, natural history, and treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in the pediatric population . Semin Liver Dis . 2000;20:37–46
- . Children with hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S173–S178
- . Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in pediatric patients . Clin Liver Dis . 1999;3:855–867
- . An analysis of published trials of interferon monotherapy in children with chronic hepatitis C . J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr . 2002;34:52–58
- . Impaired kidney transplant survival in patients with antibodies to hepatitis C virus . Nephrol Dial Transplant . 1999;14:2455–2460
- . Impact of hepatitis B and C virus on kidney transplantation outcome . Hepatology . 1999;29:257–263
- . Acute renal failure in kidney transplant patients treated with interferon alpha 2b for chronic hepatitis C . Nephron . 1996;74:512–516
- . Chronic hepatitis C after renal transplantation. Treatment with alpha-interferon . Transplantation . 1993;56:1095–1098
- . Pharmacokinetics of alphaIFN-2b in chronic hepatitis C virus patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis or with normal renal function (clinical implications) . J Am Soc Nephrol . 1998;9:2344–2348
- . Interferon monotherapy for dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C (an analysis of the literature on efficacy and safety) . Am J Gastroenterol . 2003;98:1610–1615
- . Hepatitis C infection and the patient with end-stage renal disease . Hepatology . 2002;36:3–10
- . The tolerance and efficacy of interferon-alpha in haemodialysis patients with HCV infection (a multicentre, prospective study) . Nephrol Dial Transplant . 2001;16:1017–1023
- . A double-blind controlled trial of recombinant interferon-alpha 2b in haemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and abnormal aminotransferase levels . J Viral Hepat . 1997;4:113–119
- . High rate of hepatitis C virus clearance in hemodialysis patients after interferon-alpha therapy . J Infect Dis . 1997;176:1614–1617
- . Efficacy and tolerance of interferon-alpha(2b) in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in haemodialysis patients. Pre- and post-renal transplantation assessment . Nephrol Dial Transplant . 1999;14:2704–2709
- . Efficacy of interferon for chronic hepatitis C virus-related hepatitis in kidney transplant candidates on hemodialysis (results after transplantation) . Am J Gastroenterol . 2001;96:1170–1177
- . Interferon therapy in haemodialysis patients with acute hepatitis C virus infection and factors that predict response to treatment . J Viral Hepat . 2001;8:70–77
- . Virological and histological responses to one year alpha-interferon-2a in hemodialyzed patients with chronic hepatitis C . Nephron . 2001;88:120–126
- . Ribavirin treatment in dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection—a pilot study . J Viral Hepat . 2001;8:287–292
- . Circulating immune complexes in non-A, non-B hepatitis (possible masking of viral antigen) . Lancet . 1979;1:1265–1267
- . Effects of long-term course of alpha-interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C associated to mixed cryoglobulinaemia . Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol . 1997;9:1067–1072
- . Interferon-alpha treatment of hepatitis C virus-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia . J Hepatol . 1997;27:63–71
- . Response to interferon alpha treatment and disappearance of cryoglobulinaemia in patients infected by hepatitis C virus . Gut . 1999;45:122–128
- . Interferon versus steroids in patients with hepatitis C virus-associated cryoglobulinaemic glomerulonephritis . Dig Liver Dis . 2000;32:708–715
- . Treatment of refractory, symptomatic, hepatitis C virus related mixed cryoglobulinemia with ribavirin and interferon-alpha . J Rheumatol . 2000;27:2172–2178
- . Longterm efficacy of interferon-alpha for extrahepatic disease associated with hepatitis C virus infection . J Rheumatol . 2001;28:2466–2473
- . Influence of antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus-associated cryoglobulinemic MPGN . Am J Kidney Dis . 2004;43:617–623
- . Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis associated with hepatitis C virus infection . N Engl J Med . 1993;328:465–470
- . Interferon alfa-2a therapy in cryoglobulinemia associated with hepatitis C virus . N Engl J Med . 1994;330:751–756
- . Treatment of idiopathic mixed cryoglobulinemia with alpha interferon . Am J Med . 1987;83:726–730
- . Prevalence of bcl-2 rearrangement in patients with hepatitis C virus-related mixed cryoglobulinemia with or without B-cell lymphomas . Ann Intern Med . 2002;137:571–580
- . Regression of monoclonal B-cell expansion in patients affected by mnixed cryoglobulinemia responsive to alpha-interferon therapy . Cancer . 1996;77:2604–2613
- . Hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus infection . Hepatology . 2002;36(Suppl 1):S201–S209
- . Hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients . Current Hepat Rep . 2002;1:16–22
- . Hepatitis C and progression of HIV disease . JAMA . 2002;288:199–206
- . Hepatitis C in the HIV-infected patient . Clin Liver Dis . 2003;7:179–194
- . Mortality due to hepatitis C-related liver disease in HIV-infected patients in France (Mortavic 2001 study) . AIDS . 2003;17:1803–1809
- . Hepatitis C virus infection-related morbidity and mortality among patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection . Clin Infect Dis . 2001;33:240–247
- . Influence of coinfection with hepatitis C virus on morbidity and mortality due to human immunodeficiency virus infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy . Clin Infect Dis . 2003;36:363–367
- . Hepatitis C virus is related to progressive liver disease in human immunodeficiency virus-positive hemophiliacs and should be treated as an opportunistic infection . J Infect Dis . 1999;179:1254–1258
- . Care of patients with chronic hepatitis C and HIV co-infection (recommendations from the HIV-HCV International Panel) . AIDS . 2002;16:813–828
- . Pegylated IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin as therapy for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients . AIDS . 2003;17:1023–1028
- . Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin versus interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected persons . N Engl J Med . 2004;351:451–459
- . Pegylated interferon alfa-2b vs standard interferon alfa-2b, plus ribavirin, for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients (a randomized controlled trial) . JAMA . 2004;292:2839–2848
- . Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients . N Engl J Med . 2004;351:438–450
- . Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patients . AIDS . 2004;18:F27–F36
- . Short statement of the first European consensus conference on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C in HIV co-infected patients . J Hepatol . 2005;42:615–624
- . HIV coinfection does not compromise liver histological response to interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C . AIDS . 2002;16:441–445
- . Increased mitochondrial toxicity with ribavirin in HIV/HCV coinfection . Lancet . 2001;357:280–281
- . HIV infection, hepatitis C infection, and HAART (hard clinical choices) . JAMA . 2004;292:243–250
- . Immune recovery is associated with persistent rise in HCV RNA, infrequent liver test flares, and is not impaired by HCV in co-infected subjects . AIDS . 2002;16:1915–1923
- . Liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C viral infection . Gastroenterol Clin North Am . 1993;22:231–242
- . Hepatitis C viral infection in liver transplantation . Arch Surg . 1996;131:284–291
- . Influence of the genotype of hepatitis C virus on the severity of recurrent liver disease after liver transplantation . Gastroenterology . 1995;108:1088–1096
- . Long-term outcome of hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation . N Engl J Med . 1996;334:815–820
- . European collaborative study on factors influencing outcome after liver transplantation for hepatitis C . Gastroenterology . 1999;117:619–625
- . Hepatitis C infection in liver transplantation . Am J Transpl . 2001;1:197–203
- . Natural history of recurrent hepatitis C . Liver Transpl . 2002;8(Suppl 1):S14–S18
- . The association between hepatitis C infection and survival after orthotopic liver transplantation . Gastroenterology . 2002;122:889–896
- . Hepatitis C etiology of liver disease is strongly associated with early acute rejection following liver transplantation . Liver Transpl . 2004;10:975–985
- . High incidence of allograft cirrhosis in hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection following liver transplantation (relationship with rejection episodes) . Hepatology . 1999;29:250–256
- . Short-term prednisone therapy affects aminotransferase activity and hepatitis C virus RNA levels in chronic hepatitis C . Gastroenterology . 1994;107:196–199
- . Impact of immunosuppressive therapy on recurrence of hepatitis C . Liver Transpl . 2002;8(Suppl 1):S19–S27
- . Early development of chronic active hepatitis in recurrent hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation (association with treatment of rejection) . J Hepatol . 1998;28:756–763
- . The clinical and immunologic impact of using interferon and ribavirin in the immunosuppressed host . Liver Transpl . 2003;9:S79–S89
- . Cholestatic hepatitis after liver transplantation is associated with persistently high serum hepatitis C virus RNA levels . Transpl Surg . 1998;4:15–21
- . Hyperbilirubinemia and cholestatic liver injury in hepatitis C-infected liver transplant recipients . Am J Gastroenterol . 2000;95:753–759
- . Interferon-α therapy for hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation . Hepatology . 1994;20:773–779
- . A randomized study comparing ribavirin and interferon alfa monotherapy for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation . Hepatology . 1998;27:1403–1407
- . Hepatitis C after liver transplantation . Semin Liver Dis . 2000;20:201–209
- . Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C . Liver Transpl . 2002;8(Suppl 1):S28–S37
- . Interferon-alpha 2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C after liver transplantation (a randomized study) . Gastroenterology . 2003;124:642–650
- . Pilot study of the combination of interferon alfa and ribavirin as therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation . Hepatology . 1997;26:500–504
- . Iron reduction and sustained response to interferon-alpha therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (results of an Italian multicenter randomized study) . Am J Gastroenterol . 2002;97:1204–1210
- . Iron reduction as an adjuvant to interferon therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C who have previously not responded to interferon (a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial) . Hepatology . 2000;32:135–138
- . A randomized trial of amantadine and interferon versus interferon alone as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2001;33:989–993
- . Pilot study of triple antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C in interferon alpha non-responders . Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol . 1999;31:130–134
- . Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of interferon alfa2a with and without amantadine as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C . Hepatology . 2000;32:835–841
- . Interferon and amantadine in combination as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C patients . J Hepatol . 2001;35:517–521
- . A randomized, double-blind controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin vs. interferon alpha-2b and amantadine for treatment of chronic hepatitis C non-responder to interferon monotherapy . J Hepatol . 2001;34:128–233
- . Interferon and amantadine in naive chronic hepatitis C (a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial) . Hepatology . 2002;35:447–454
- . A randomised, open label, controlled trial on the effect of interferon plus amantadine compared with interferon alone for treatment of chronic hepatitis C . Hepatol Res . 2003;26:167–173
- . Intravenous recombinant interferon-beta versus interferon-alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination for short-term treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients not responding to interferon-alpha . Scand J Gastroenterol . 1999;34:928–933
- . Long-term clinical outcome after beta-interferon therapy in cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C . Hepatogastroenterology . 1999;46:3216–3222
- . High viral eradication with a daily 12-week natural interferon-beta treatment regimen in chronic hepatitis C patients with low viral load . Dig Dis Sci . 2000;45:2414–2421
- . Twice-daily administration of interferon-beta for chronic hepatitis C is not superior to a once-daily regimen . J Gastroenterol . 2001;36:242–247
- . Immunological response to interferon-gamma priming prior to interferon-alpha treatment in refractory chronic hepatitis C in relation to viral clearance . J Viral Hepat . 2001;8:180–185
- . Interferon gamma-1b for the treatment of chronic HCV infection . (abstr) Gastroenterology . 2003;124:A718
- . A pilot study of daily subcutaneous interleukin-10 in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection . J Interferon Cytokine Res . 1999;19:1265–1270
- . Interleukin 10 treatment reduces fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C (a pilot trial of interferon nonresponders) . Gastroenterology . 2000;118:655–660
- . Long-term interleukin 10 therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients has a proviral and anti-inflammaatory effect . Hepatology . 2003;38:859–868
- . Interferon and thymosin combination therapy in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C (preliminary results) . Liver . 1998;18:366–369
- . Combination therapy with thymosin alpha1 and interferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection (a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial) . Hepatology . 1998;27:1128–1135
- . Decrease in serum levels of markers of hepatic connective tissue turnover during and after treatment of chronic hepatitis B with interferon-α . Hepatology . 1994;19:849–856
- . Maintenance therapy with gradual reduction of the interferon dose over one year improves histological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C with biochemical response (results of a randomized trial) . J Hepatol . 2001;35:272–278
- . Maintenance therapies for hepatitis C . Current Hepat Rep . 2004;3:23–29
- . Evolution of the HALT-C Trial (pegylated interferon as maintenance therapy for chronic hepatitis C in previous interferon nonresponders) . Control Clinical Trials . 2005;25:472–492
- . Comparison of therapy with PEG-Intron 0.5 mcg/kg versus colchicine 0.6 mg bid in 250 patients with cirrhosis and HCV (Interim data from COPILOT) . (abstr) Hepatology . 2002;36:312A
- . Complementary and alternative therapies in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (a systematic review) . J Hepatol . 2004;40:491–500
- . Complementary and alternative medicine in chronic liver disease . Hepatology . 2001;34:596–603
- . Medicinal herbs for hepatitis C virus infection (a Cochrane hepatobiliary systematic review of randomized trials) . Am J Gastroenterol . 2003;98:538–544
This literature review and the recommendations therein were prepared for the American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice and Economics Committee. It was approved by the Committee on September 17, 2005, and by the AGA Governing Board on November 6, 2005.
PII: S0016-5085(05)02270-5
doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.010
© 2006 American Gastroenterological Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to erratum:
- Correction
- Correction

