Gastroenterology
Volume 130, Issue 1 , Pages 218-224 , January 2006

What Will Be Needed for the New Gastroenterology Fellowship Match to Succeed?

  • Muriel Niederle

      Affiliations

    • Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
    • National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to: Chair, Clinical Practice and Economics Committee, AGA National Office, c/o Membership Department, 4930 Del Ray Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. Fax: (301) 654-5920
  • ,
  • Deborah D. Proctor

      Affiliations

    • Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • ,
  • Alvin E. Roth

      Affiliations

    • Department of Economics, and Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

References 

  1. Proctor DD. AGA task force recommends reinstating the national GI fellowship match. 2005. Available at: http://www.gastro.org/wmspage.cfm?parm1=329. Accessed on July 7, 2005.
  2. Gastroenterology fellowship match. GI will rejoin the match in 2006. 2005. Available at: http://www.gastro.org/wmspage.cfm?parm1=989. Accessed on July 7, 2005.
  3. Roth AE . The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents (a case study in game theory) . J Political Economy . 1984;92:991–1016
  4. Roth AE . The origins, history, and design of the resident match . JAMA . 2003;289:909–912
  5. Gerson L. To match or not to match in gastroenterology: an interview with David Brenner, MD, Chair of AGA’s Manpower and Training Committee. AGA Trainee & Young GI News, Spring 1999, Volume 5, Number 1. Available at: http://www.gastro.org/trainee/trainee6.html. Accessed Spring 2003.
  6. Bauer WT , Fackler W , Kongara K , Matteoni C , Shen B , Vaezi M . Comment to (it’s time to bring the best and brightest back to gastroenterology) . Gastroenterology . 1999;116:1014
  7. McKinney CN , Niederle M , Roth AE . The collapse of a medical labor clearinghouse (and why such failures are rare) . Am Econ Rev . 2005;95:878–889
  8. Gorelick FS . Striking up the match . Gastroenterology . 1999;117:295
  9. Liddle RA . The best and the brightest . Gastroenterology . 2002;122:851–852
  10. Niederle M , Roth AE . Market culture (how norms governing exploding offers affect market performance.) . 2004; NBER working paper, February
  11. Niederle M , Roth AE . The gastroenterology fellowship match (how it failed, and why it could succeed once again) . Gastroenterology . 2004;127:658–666
  12. Lim JK , Shah SB . Restoring a gastroenterology fellowship match (a trainee perspective) . Am J Gastroenterol . 2004;99:1412–1414
  13. Niederle M , Roth AE . Unraveling reduces mobility in a labor market (gastroenterology with and without a centralized match) . J Political Economy . 2003;111:1342–1352
  14. Achkar E . Balancing view. The GI match: what is in the balance? . Am J Gastroenterol . 2004;99:9
  15. Ehrinpreis MN . Con: the gastroenterology fellowship match: R.I.P . Am J Gastroenterol . 2004;99:7
  16. Richter JE . Pro: gastroenterology match: good for all the players . Am J Gastroenterol . 2004;99:6
  17. Niederle M , Roth AE . Re-starting the gastroenterology match . Am J Gastroenterol . 2005;100:1202–1203
  18. Niederle M , Roth AE . The gastroenterology fellowship market (should there be a match?) . Am Econ Rev Papers and Proceedings . 2005;95:372–375
  19. Jung, et al. v. Ass’n of Am. Med. C., et al., Class Action Complaint, No. 02-CV-00873 (D.D.C. May 5, 2002).
  20. Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004, Public Law No. 108-218. Available at: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ218.108.pdf. Accessed November 17, 2005.
  21. Niederle M , Roth AE . Relationship between wages and presence of a match in medical fellowships . JAMA . 2003;290:1153–1154
  22. Niederle M , Roth AE . Effect of a match on salaries for medical fellows-reply . JAMA . 2003;290:2408
  23. Paul Jung, MD v. Association of American Medical Colleges, Civil Action No. 02-873, Opinion, Order & Judgment issued August 12, 2004, by Judge Paul L. Friedman. Available at: http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/02-873a.pdf. Accessed on November 17, 2005.
  24. Roth AE , Xing X . Jumping the gun (imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions) . Am Econ Rev . 1994;84:992–1044
  25. Talley N , Richter JE , Achkar E . Editors’ comments . Am J Gastroenterol . 2004;99:1411
  26. Pardi DS . Should the national GI fellowship matching program be restored? . Am J Gastroenterol . 2004;99:1411–1412
  27. Roth AE , Peranson E . The redesign of the matching market for American physicians (some engineering aspects of economic design) . Am Econ Rev . 1999;89:748–780
  28. Council of Graduate Schools. Resolution Regarding Graduate Scholars, Fellows, Trainees, and Assistants. Available at: http://www.cgsnet.org/PublicationsPolicyRes/resolutions.htm. Accessed November 17, 2005.
  29. Roth AE , Peranson E . The effects of the change in the NRMP matching algorithm . JAMA . 1997;278:729–732
  30. A guide for GI fellowship programs. How the match will work for gastroenterology. 2005. Available at: http://www.gastro.org/user-assets/Documents/Match/factsheet_training_programs.pdf. Accessed on July 7, 2005.

PII: S0016-5085(05)02238-9

doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.058

Gastroenterology
Volume 130, Issue 1 , Pages 218-224 , January 2006