Gastroenterology
Volume 128, Issue 7 , Pages 1819-1829, June 2005

Brain Response to Visceral Aversive Conditioning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

  • Lidia Yágüez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to: Lidia Yágüez, PhD, Department of Psychology, P077, HWB, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom. fax: (44) 0-20-7848-5006.
  • ,
  • Steven Coen

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Lloyd J. Gregory

      Affiliations

    • Section of GI Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Edson Amaro Jr

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Christian Altman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Michael J. Brammer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Edward T. Bullmore

      Affiliations

    • Brain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Steven C.R. Williams

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Qasim Aziz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, London, United Kingdom

Received 1 March 2004; accepted 23 February 2005.

Background & Aims: Brain-imaging studies to date have confounded visceral pain perception with anticipation. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain to study the neuroanatomic network involved in aversive conditioning of visceral pain and, thus, anticipation. Methods: Eight healthy volunteers (5 male) participated in the study. We used a classic conditioning paradigm in which 3 neutral stimuli (differently colored circles) that acted as conditioned stimuli were paired with painful esophageal distention, air puff to the wrist, or nothing, which acted as unconditioned stimuli. Neural activity was measured during learning, anticipation (pairing only 50% of conditioned stimuli with their unconditioned stimuli), and extinction (unpaired conditioned stimuli) phases. For magnetic resonance imaging, axial slices depicting blood oxygen level-dependent contrast were acquired with a 1.5-T system. Results: Neural responses during the learning phase included areas commonly associated with visceral pain (anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and primary and secondary somatosensory cortices) and innocuous somatosensory perception (primary and secondary somatosensory cortices and insula). During the anticipation and extinction phases of aversive stimulation, brain activity resembled that seen during actual painful esophageal stimulation. In contrast, anticipation and extinction of the innocuous somatic stimulus failed to show that effect. Conclusions: We have shown that actual and anticipated visceral pain elicit similar cortical responses. These results have implications for the design and interpretation of brain-imaging studies of visceral pain. They not only contribute to our understanding of the processing of visceral pain, but also have clinical implications for the management of chronic pain states.

Abbreviations used in this paper:  ACC, anterior cingulate cortex , BA, Brodmann area , CS, conditioned stimulus , DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , EPI, echoplanar imaging , fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging , ISI, interstimulus interval , SI, primary somatosensory cortex , SII, secondary somatosensory cortex , SMA, supplementary motor area , SSQ, sum of squares ratio , UCS, unconditioned stimulus , W, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funded by a grant awarded by the Medical Research Council, UK (to Q.A.).

PII: S0016-5085(05)00629-3

doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.068

Gastroenterology
Volume 128, Issue 7 , Pages 1819-1829, June 2005