Gastroenterology
Volume 122, Issue 5 , Pages 1226-1234, May 2002

On-site screening sigmoidoscopy promotes long-term utilization but fails as a venue for training primary care endoscopists☆☆

  • Paul C. Schroy III

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center
    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Tim Heeren

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Charles M. Bliss

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center
  • ,
  • Charles M. Bliss Jr.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center
  • ,
  • Jon Pincus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center
  • ,
  • Sheila Wilson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center
  • ,
  • Marianne Prout

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Received 10 September 2001; accepted 24 January 2002.

Abstract 

Background & Aims: “Academic detailing” is an effective strategy for promoting the use of screening sigmoidoscopy by primary care physicians. The primary objectives of this study were to determine whether the sustained presence of an “outside” university-based gastroenterologist performing on-site screening sigmoidoscopy promoted long-term utilization and whether the provision for on-site sigmoidoscopy was an effective venue for training primary care endoscopists. Methods: Nine urban community health centers, including 4 intervention and 5 control sites, participated in a nonrandomized controlled trial conducted over 3 years. Results: By the end of year 3, overall self-reported use of screening sigmoidoscopy increased by 61% for the intervention group vs. only 25% for the comparison group (P = 0.001). Ninety-seven percent of those reporting compliance referred 1 or more asymptomatic average-risk patients for screening examinations. Only 2 of 83 (2.4%) eligible providers completed on-site training and continued performing screening examinations independently. The major barriers to participation included lack of interest, lack of time to learn or perform sigmoidoscopy, concerns about technical competence, and lack of need because of on-site availability. Conclusions: Maintenance of on-site screening sigmoidoscopy services performed by an outside gastroenterologist promotes long-term utilization but fails as venue for training primary care endoscopists. Alternative strategies for expanding capacity are needed.

GASTROENTEROLOGY 2002;122:1226-1234

Abbreviations:  NHC , neighborhood health center, PCP , primary care provider

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Address requests for reprints to: Paul C. Schroy III, M.D., M.P.H., Boston Medical Center, E201, 88 East Newton Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02118. e-mail: paul.schroy@bmc.org; fax: (617) 638-7785.

☆☆ Supported by National Cancer Institute Preventive Oncology Academic Award KO7-CA68058 (to P.C.S.).

PII: S0016-5085(02)99596-X

Gastroenterology
Volume 122, Issue 5 , Pages 1226-1234, May 2002