Gastroenterology
Volume 138, Issue 4 , Pages 1297-1301, April 2010

The Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Antireflux Surgery

  • Jesper Lagergren

      Affiliations

    • Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests Address requests for reprints to: Jesper Lagergren, MD, PhD, Professor of Surgery, Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. fax: (46) 8-51776280
  • ,
  • Weimin Ye

      Affiliations

    • Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • Pernilla Lagergren

      Affiliations

    • Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • Yunxia Lu

      Affiliations

    • Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Received 6 October 2009; accepted 6 January 2010. published online 18 January 2010.

Background & Aims

The question of a possible preventive effect of antireflux surgery on the development of esophageal or cardia adenocarcinoma remains unsettled. We aimed to clarify whether antireflux surgery prevents later development of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

We performed a Swedish population-based cohort study of antireflux surgery from 1965 to 2006. Follow-up evaluation for cancer and censoring for death and emigration were achieved up to December 31, 2006, through linkages to nationwide registers of cancer, population, and emigration. The cancer incidence in the antireflux surgery cohort was compared with that in the corresponding Swedish population. Relative risks were presented as standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), that is, the observed number of cancer cases in the antireflux surgery cohort divided by the expected number.

Results

The antireflux surgery cohort comprised 14,102 persons, contributing 120,514 person-years at risk. Overall risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 39) was increased 12-fold (SIR, 12.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7–16.8). No risk decrease with time after antireflux surgery was found (P = .86). After a postsurgical follow-up evaluation of 15 years or more, the SIR was 14.6 (95% CI, 7.0–26.8). For the corresponding overall risk of cardia adenocarcinoma (n = 21) the SIR was 4.4 (95% CI, 2.7–6.7), without any major decrease in risk with time (P = .20); the SIR was 3.1 (95% CI, 0.6–9.1) after at least 15 years of follow-up evaluation. No association between antireflux surgery and gastric adenocarcinoma or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was identified.

Conclusions

Antireflux surgery cannot be considered to prevent the development of esophageal or cardia adenocarcinoma among persons with reflux.

Keywords: Neoplasm, Prevention, Fundoplication, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Esophagus, Cardia

Abbreviations used in this paper: CI, confidence interval, SIR, standardized incidence ratio

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

 Funding Financial support was provided by the Swedish Cancer Society and the Swedish Research Council. These funders were not involved in the design or implementation of the study; the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

PII: S0016-5085(10)00020-X

doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.004

Gastroenterology
Volume 138, Issue 4 , Pages 1297-1301, April 2010