Gastroenterology
Volume 132, Issue 3 , Pages 955-965 , March 2007

CD40–CD40 Ligand Mediates the Recruitment of Leukocytes and Platelets in the Inflamed Murine Colon

  • Thorsten Vowinkel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
    • Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
    • T. Vowinkel and C. Anthoni contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • Christoph Anthoni

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
    • Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
    • T. Vowinkel and C. Anthoni contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • Katherine C. Wood

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
  • ,
  • Karen Y. Stokes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
  • ,
  • Janice Russell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
  • ,
  • Laura Gray

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
  • ,
  • Sulaiman Bharwani

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
  • ,
  • Norbert Senninger

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
  • ,
  • J. Steven Alexander

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
  • ,
  • Christian F. Krieglstein

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
  • ,
  • Matthew B. Grisham

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
  • ,
  • D. Neil Granger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: D. Neil Granger, PhD, Department of Molecular & Cellular Physiology, LSU Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130-3932. fax: (318) 675-6005.

Received 21 February 2006 ,Accepted 27 November 2006.

  • Image Result

    Effects of DSS (vs H2O) treatment (day 0–day 6) on the expression of CD40 in the vasculature of the proximal and distal colon in WT mice at day 6. Zero denotes no detectable expression. Data are prese

    Effects of DSS (vs H2O) treatment (day 0–day 6) on the expression of CD40 in the vasculature of the proximal and distal colon in WT mice at day 6. Zero denotes no detectable expression. Data are presented as the mean ± SE. *Denotes statistical significance (P < .05) compared with corresponding control (H2O).

  • Image Result
    Changes in the disease activity index (A) and body weight (%) (B) over the course of DSS (or H2O) treatment in WT, CD40-deficient (CD40−/−), and CD40L-deficient (CD40L−/−) mice. Data are presented as

    Changes in the disease activity index (A) and body weight (%) (B) over the course of DSS (or H2O) treatment in WT, CD40-deficient (CD40/), and CD40L-deficient (CD40L/) mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SE. *P < .05 vs H2O, #P < .05 vs DSS.

  • Image Result
    Length of the resected colon (cm) at day 6 of DSS (or H2O) treatment in WT, CD40-deficient (CD40−/−), and CD40L-deficient (CD40L−/−) mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SE. *P < .05 vs H2O, #P < .0

    Length of the resected colon (cm) at day 6 of DSS (or H2O) treatment in WT, CD40-deficient (CD40/), and CD40L-deficient (CD40L/) mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SE. *P < .05 vs H2O, #P < .05 vs DSS.

  • Image Result
    Blinded histologic assessment of colonic mucosa at day 6 of DSS (or H2O) treatment in WT, CD40-deficient (CD40−/−), and CD40L-deficient (CD40L−/−) mice. Zero denotes no detectable response in H2O-trea

    Blinded histologic assessment of colonic mucosa at day 6 of DSS (or H2O) treatment in WT, CD40-deficient (CD40/), and CD40L-deficient (CD40L/) mice. Zero denotes no detectable response in H2O-treated WT mice. The total histologic score was derived from the severity and extent of inflammation and crypt damage. For each mouse, 3 sections were analyzed (mean ± SE). * and # denote statistical significance (P < .05) compared with control and WT DSS-treated animals, respectively.

  • Image Result
    Histology (H&E staining; magnification ×100) of colonic samples taken at day 6 from WT animals receiving H2O (control) or from WT, CD40−/−, and CD40L−/− mice receiving DSS in drinking water. Compared

    Histology (H&E staining; magnification ×100) of colonic samples taken at day 6 from WT animals receiving H2O (control) or from WT, CD40/, and CD40L/ mice receiving DSS in drinking water. Compared with the colon of control animals (A), the colon of WT DSS-treated mice (B) showed destruction of the bowel wall architecture with loss of the epithelial lining (arrowheads), vanished crypts, submucosal edema (asterisk), and dense cellular inflammation in all layers (arrows). Histologic specimens of CD40/ (C) and CD40L/ (D) mice exhibited an attenuated morphologic damage with only mild cellular infiltration (arrow).

  • Image Result
    Colonic myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity at day 6 in H2O-treated WT mice and WT, CD40−/−, and CD40L−/− mice receiving DSS in drinking water from day 0–day 6. *P < .05 vs water, #P < .05 vs DSS.

    Colonic myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity at day 6 in H2O-treated WT mice and WT, CD40/, and CD40L/ mice receiving DSS in drinking water from day 0–day 6. *P < .05 vs water, #P < .05 vs DSS.

  • Image Result
    Rolling platelets (A) and leukocytes (B) and firmly adherent platelets (C) and leukocytes (D) in postcapillary venules on day 6 of treatment with H2O (WT control) or DSS in WT, CD40−/−, and CD40L−/− m

    Rolling platelets (A) and leukocytes (B) and firmly adherent platelets (C) and leukocytes (D) in postcapillary venules on day 6 of treatment with H2O (WT control) or DSS in WT, CD40/, and CD40L/ mice. The number of platelets bound to leukocytes (platelet–leukocyte interactions) and those bound directly to endothelium (platelet–endothelial interactions) are shown in A and C. The number of platelet-bearing and platelet-free rolling and adherent leukocytes are presented in B and D. *P < .05 relative to H2O, #P < .05 relative to WT mice treated with DSS &P < .05 relative to CD40/.

 Supported by grants from the National Institute of Health (DK065649 to D.N.G.) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (VO998/1-1 to T.V.).

PII: S0016-5085(06)02677-1

doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.027

Gastroenterology
Volume 132, Issue 3 , Pages 955-965 , March 2007