Gastroenterology
Volume 132, Issue 1 , Pages 96-102, January 2007

Rates of New or Missed Colorectal Cancers After Colonoscopy and Their Risk Factors: A Population-Based Analysis

  • Brian Bressler

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto
  • ,
  • Lawrence F. Paszat

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto
    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto
  • ,
  • Zhongliang Chen

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto
  • ,
  • Deanna M. Rothwell

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto
  • ,
  • Chris Vinden

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto
    • Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
  • ,
  • Linda Rabeneck

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto
    • Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto
    • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to: Linda Rabeneck, MD, MPH, Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room T2-025, Toronto ON M4N 3M5, Canada. fax: (416) 480-5804.
    • L.R. is a senior investigator with the Cancer Quality Council of Ontario.

Received 3 January 2006; accepted 5 October 2006.

Background & Aims: The rate of new or missed colorectal cancer (CRC) after colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual practice are unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the rate and risk factors in a population-based study. Methods: We analyzed data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, the Ontario Health Insurance Program, and Ontario Cancer Registry for all patients (≥20 years of age) with a new diagnosis of right-sided, transverse, splenic flexure/descending, rectal or sigmoid CRC in Ontario from April 1, 1997 to March 31, 2002, who had a colonoscopy within the 3 years before their diagnosis. Patients with new or missed cancers were those whose most recent colonoscopy was 6 to 36 months before diagnosis. We examined characteristics that might be risk factors for new or missed CRC. Results: We identified a diagnosis of CRC in 3288 (right sided), 777 (transverse), 710 (splenic flexure/descending), and 7712 (rectal or sigmoid) patients. The rates of new or missed cancers were 5.9%, 5.5%, 2.1%, and 2.3%, respectively. Independent risk factors for these cancers in men and women were older age; diverticular disease; right-sided or transverse CRC; colonoscopy by an internist or family physician; and colonoscopy in an office. Conclusions: Because having an office colonoscopy and certain patient, procedure, and physician characteristics are independent risk factors for new or missed CRC, physicians must inform patients of the small risk (2% to 6%) of these cancers after colonoscopy. The influence of type of physician and setting on the accuracy of colonoscopy, potentially modifiable risk factors, warrants further study.

Abbreviations used in this paper: CI, confidence interval, CIHI, Canadian Institute for Health Information, CPDB, Corporate Provider Database, CRC, colorectal cancer, ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, OCR, Ontario Cancer Registry, OHIP, Ontario Health Insurance Plan, RPDB, Registered Persons Database

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0016-5085(06)02261-X

doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.027

Gastroenterology
Volume 132, Issue 1 , Pages 96-102, January 2007