Gastroenterology
Volume 130, Issue 6 , Pages 1872-1885 , May 2006

Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society

  • Sidney J. Winawer

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress requests for reprints to: Sidney J. Winawer, MD, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021. fax: (212) 639-2766
  • ,
  • Ann G. Zauber

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
  • ,
  • Robert H. Fletcher

      Affiliations

    • Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • ,
  • Jonathon S. Stillman

      Affiliations

    • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
  • ,
  • Michael J. O’Brien

      Affiliations

    • Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • ,
  • Bernard Levin

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
  • ,
  • Robert A. Smith

      Affiliations

    • American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • ,
  • David A. Lieberman

      Affiliations

    • Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
  • ,
  • Randall W. Burt

      Affiliations

    • Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  • ,
  • Theodore R. Levin

      Affiliations

    • Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California, USA
  • ,
  • John H. Bond

      Affiliations

    • University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  • ,
  • Durado Brooks

      Affiliations

    • American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • ,
  • Tim Byers

      Affiliations

    • University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
  • ,
  • Neil Hyman

      Affiliations

    • University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
  • ,
  • Lynne Kirk

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • ,
  • Alan Thorson

      Affiliations

    • Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
  • ,
  • Clifford Simmang

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • ,
  • David Johnson

      Affiliations

    • Eastern Virginia School of Medicine, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • ,
  • Douglas K. Rex

      Affiliations

    • Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

  • Image Result

    These graphs show the associations between adenoma characteristics at baseline and subsequent risk for (A) adenomas and for (B) advanced adenomas or colorectal cancer. The dotted line separates the re

    These graphs show the associations between adenoma characteristics at baseline and subsequent risk for (A) adenomas and for (B) advanced adenomas or colorectal cancer. The dotted line separates the results from the RCTs of surveillance and chemoprevention from the results from the observational cohort studies. Within the 2 groupings the studies are listed by year published. The graphs are presented for the baseline risk factors of adenoma multiplicity (≥3), adenoma size (≥1.0 cm), adenoma histology (tubulovillous or villous), (A) high-grade dysplasia, and proximal location (B). The left column is for the risk with respect to adenomas at surveillance, and the right column is for risk with respect to advanced neoplasia. The studies differ with respect to the classification levels of the risk factors and on the definition of advanced neoplasia. The specification of each study is given in the appendix (see supplemental material online at www.gastrojournal.org). The studies also cover different periods of follow-up evaluation and use different measures of effect such as ORs, relative risks, hazard ratios, and SIRs as noted in the appendix (see supplemental material online at www.gastrojournal.org). The term relative risk is used on the horizontal axis of the figure to represent these different measures of effect. The referent category for the ORs, relative risks, and hazard ratios is the lowest risk category. These estimates are denoted by black circles. Multivariate estimates are used when available. In 2 studies, SIRs were reported and are denoted by black squares. The referent category for the SIR is the general population. Note that Avidan et al34 and Noshirwani et al31 used the number of adenomas, not more than 3 adenomas. CC, colon cancer; RC, rectal cancer. Relative risk represents the OR, relative risk, hazard ratio, or SIR as summarized for each study in the appendix (see supplemental material online at www.gastrojournal.org).

 This article is being published jointly in 2006 in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (online: May 30, 2006; print: May/June 2006) and Gastroenterology (online: May 2006; print: May 2006) by the American Cancer Society and the American Gastroenterology Association. ©2006 American Cancer Society, Inc. and American Gastroenterology Association, Inc. Copying with attribution allowed for any noncommercial use of the work.

PII: S0016-5085(06)00561-0

doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.012

Gastroenterology
Volume 130, Issue 6 , Pages 1872-1885 , May 2006